The effect of the use of the Gail model on breast cancer diagnosis in BIRADs 4a cases.

E. Karakaya, Murathan Erkent, Hale Turnaoğlu, Tuğçe Şirinoğlu, A. Akdur, Lara Kavasoğlu
{"title":"The effect of the use of the Gail model on breast cancer diagnosis in BIRADs 4a cases.","authors":"E. Karakaya, Murathan Erkent, Hale Turnaoğlu, Tuğçe Şirinoğlu, A. Akdur, Lara Kavasoğlu","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2021.5436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives\nThe BI-RADS classification system and the Gail Model are the scoring systems that contribute to the diagnosis of breast cancer. The aim of the study was to determine the contribution of Gail Model to the diagnosis of breast lesions that were radiologically categorized as BI-RADS 4A.\n\n\nMaterial and Methods\nWe retrospectively examined the medical records of 320 patients between January 2011 and December 2020 whose lesions had been categorized as BI-RADS 4A. Radiological parameters of breast lesions and clinical parameters according to the Gail Model were collected. The relationship between malignant BI-RADS 4A lesions and radiological and clinical parameters was evaluated. In addition, the effect of the Gail Model on diagnosis in malignant BI-RADS 4A lesions was evaluated.\n\n\nResults\nAmong radiological features, there were significant differences between lesion size, contour, microcalcification content, echogenicity, and presence of ectasia with respect to the pathological diagnosis (p <0.05). No significant difference was found between the lesions' pathological diagnosis and the patients' Gail score (p> 0.05). An analysis of the features of the Gail model revealed that there was no significant difference between the age of menarche, age at first live birth, presence of a first-degree relative with breast cancer, and a history of breast biopsy and the pathological diagnosis (p> 0.05).\n\n\nConclusion\nAs a conclusion Gail Model does not contribute to the diagnosis of BC, especially in patients with BI-RADS 4A lesions.","PeriodicalId":90992,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi","volume":"37 4 1","pages":"394-399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2021.5436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives The BI-RADS classification system and the Gail Model are the scoring systems that contribute to the diagnosis of breast cancer. The aim of the study was to determine the contribution of Gail Model to the diagnosis of breast lesions that were radiologically categorized as BI-RADS 4A. Material and Methods We retrospectively examined the medical records of 320 patients between January 2011 and December 2020 whose lesions had been categorized as BI-RADS 4A. Radiological parameters of breast lesions and clinical parameters according to the Gail Model were collected. The relationship between malignant BI-RADS 4A lesions and radiological and clinical parameters was evaluated. In addition, the effect of the Gail Model on diagnosis in malignant BI-RADS 4A lesions was evaluated. Results Among radiological features, there were significant differences between lesion size, contour, microcalcification content, echogenicity, and presence of ectasia with respect to the pathological diagnosis (p <0.05). No significant difference was found between the lesions' pathological diagnosis and the patients' Gail score (p> 0.05). An analysis of the features of the Gail model revealed that there was no significant difference between the age of menarche, age at first live birth, presence of a first-degree relative with breast cancer, and a history of breast biopsy and the pathological diagnosis (p> 0.05). Conclusion As a conclusion Gail Model does not contribute to the diagnosis of BC, especially in patients with BI-RADS 4A lesions.
Gail模型对BIRADs 4a病例乳腺癌诊断的影响。
目的BI-RADS分类系统和Gail模型是有助于诊断癌症的评分系统。本研究的目的是确定Gail模型对乳腺病变诊断的贡献,这些病变在放射学上被归类为BI-RADS 4A。材料和方法我们回顾性检查了2011年1月至2020年12月期间320名患者的医疗记录,这些患者的病变被归类为BI-RADS 4A。根据Gail模型收集乳腺病变的放射学参数和临床参数。评估恶性BI-RADS 4A病变与放射学和临床参数之间的关系。此外,还评估了Gail模型在恶性BI-RADS 4A病变诊断中的作用。结果在放射学特征中,病变大小、轮廓、微钙化含量、回声和扩张的存在与病理诊断之间存在显著差异(p0.05)。对Gail模型特征的分析显示,初潮年龄、首次活产年龄、,结论Gail模型对乳腺癌的诊断没有贡献,尤其是对BI-RADS 4A病变的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信