Covid-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Predictors of Hesitance among Antenatal care Booked Pregnant in North West Ethiopia 2021: Implications for Intervention and Cues to Action

IF 0.1 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Fassikaw Kebede, B. Kebede, Tsehay Kebede
{"title":"Covid-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Predictors of Hesitance among Antenatal care Booked Pregnant in North West Ethiopia 2021: Implications for Intervention and Cues to Action","authors":"Fassikaw Kebede, B. Kebede, Tsehay Kebede","doi":"10.6000/1929-4247.2022.11.01.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite efforts to decrease the burden, vaccine hesitancy is increasing worldwide and deterring efforts to control the spread of COVID-19 after the approval of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. This study aims to assess levels of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and predictors of hesitancy for pregnant women attending antenatal care in Ethiopia. \nMethods: Facility-based cross-sectional study was employed among 336 pregnant women from April 7 to June 10, 2021. The systematic random sampling technique was used to select pregnant from three health centers. Epi-Data version 3.2 and STATA/14 software were used for both data entry and analysis, respectively. A Logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitance. Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval was used to estimate the strength of association at P<0.05. \nResult: This study included 336 pregnant mothers who were booked ANC in three health centers. The overall levels of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant mothers were 79.17 %(95%CI: 74.5 --83.2). Whereas, having poor attitude towards COVID-19 vaccines (AOR=9.4; 95%CI: 3.7--21.1, P<0.001), monthly income ≤118.5 US dollar (AOR =6.3; 95%CI: 2.9--12.2, P<0.002), Mother who are illiterate and started ANC (AOR=9.5; 95%CI: 4.6--22.6, P<0.001), Being unplanned pregnant (AOR =7.5; 95%CI: 3.6-11.2, P<0.002), first time ANC initiated (AOR =4.2; 95%CI: 2.9--15.1, P<0.001), and pregnant didn’t used social media (AOR= 6.0: 95%CI: 2.5--14.6, P< 0.02) were significantly associated with COVID-19 Vaccine hesitance. \nConclusion: The acceptability of the COVID-19 vaccine among pregnant mothers was insufficient compared with previous research. Health care workers should provide health education during ANC visits to change their negative attitude and reassurance for the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine.","PeriodicalId":43030,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Child Health and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Child Health and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4247.2022.11.01.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite efforts to decrease the burden, vaccine hesitancy is increasing worldwide and deterring efforts to control the spread of COVID-19 after the approval of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. This study aims to assess levels of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and predictors of hesitancy for pregnant women attending antenatal care in Ethiopia. Methods: Facility-based cross-sectional study was employed among 336 pregnant women from April 7 to June 10, 2021. The systematic random sampling technique was used to select pregnant from three health centers. Epi-Data version 3.2 and STATA/14 software were used for both data entry and analysis, respectively. A Logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitance. Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval was used to estimate the strength of association at P<0.05. Result: This study included 336 pregnant mothers who were booked ANC in three health centers. The overall levels of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant mothers were 79.17 %(95%CI: 74.5 --83.2). Whereas, having poor attitude towards COVID-19 vaccines (AOR=9.4; 95%CI: 3.7--21.1, P<0.001), monthly income ≤118.5 US dollar (AOR =6.3; 95%CI: 2.9--12.2, P<0.002), Mother who are illiterate and started ANC (AOR=9.5; 95%CI: 4.6--22.6, P<0.001), Being unplanned pregnant (AOR =7.5; 95%CI: 3.6-11.2, P<0.002), first time ANC initiated (AOR =4.2; 95%CI: 2.9--15.1, P<0.001), and pregnant didn’t used social media (AOR= 6.0: 95%CI: 2.5--14.6, P< 0.02) were significantly associated with COVID-19 Vaccine hesitance. Conclusion: The acceptability of the COVID-19 vaccine among pregnant mothers was insufficient compared with previous research. Health care workers should provide health education during ANC visits to change their negative attitude and reassurance for the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine.
2021年埃塞俄比亚西北部预定产前保健的孕妇中Covid-19疫苗接受度和犹豫不决的预测因素:对干预的影响和行动线索
尽管努力减轻负担,但在批准SARS-CoV-2疫苗后,全球范围内对疫苗的犹豫正在加剧,阻碍了控制COVID-19传播的努力。本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚孕妇接受COVID-19疫苗的水平和犹豫不决的预测因素。方法:于2021年4月7日至6月10日对336名孕妇进行基于设施的横断面研究。采用系统随机抽样的方法,对三家保健中心的孕妇进行抽样调查。数据录入和分析分别采用Epi-Data 3.2版本和STATA/14软件。采用Logistic回归模型确定COVID-19疫苗犹豫的预测因素。采用95%置信区间的校正优势比(AOR)估计关联强度,P<0.05。结果:本研究包括336名孕妇,她们在三个保健中心预约了ANC。孕妇接受COVID-19疫苗的总体水平为79.17% (95%CI: 74.5—83.2)。而对COVID-19疫苗态度较差(AOR=9.4;95%CI: 3.7—21.1,P<0.001),月收入≤118.5美元(AOR =6.3;95%CI: 2.9—12.2,P<0.002),母亲为文盲并开始ANC (AOR=9.5;95%CI: 4.6—22.6,P<0.001),意外怀孕(AOR =7.5;95%CI: 3.6 ~ 11.2, P<0.002),首次发生ANC (AOR =4.2;95%CI: 2.9—15.1,P<0.001),孕妇不使用社交媒体(AOR= 6.0: 95%CI: 2.5—14.6,P< 0.02)与COVID-19疫苗犹豫显著相关。结论:与以往研究相比,孕妇对COVID-19疫苗的可接受性不足。医护人员应在ANC访问期间提供健康教育,以改变其消极态度,并确保COVID-19疫苗的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信