Symptomatic Mild Carotid Artery Stenosis

A. Larson, V. Nardi, G. Lanzino, W. Brinjikji, E. Scharf, L. Savastano
{"title":"Symptomatic Mild Carotid Artery Stenosis","authors":"A. Larson, V. Nardi, G. Lanzino, W. Brinjikji, E. Scharf, L. Savastano","doi":"10.1097/01.cne.0000723688.52449.d5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"predict the risk of future ischemic events in patients with carotid artery stenosis based on ultrasound findings that assessed morphology and composition of plaque. However, with publication of landmark clinical trials, leading to a definition of the indications for treatment of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, the focus was exclusively on the degree of stenosis rather than plaque morphology and composition. Therefore, over the past 30 years, decisions for invasive treatment have been based on degree of stenosis, and this is reflected in published guidelines. However, a growing body of scientific evidence suggests that a culprit plaque is not necessarily large and causing “clinically significant stenosis,” but vulnerable (ie, prone to rupture or to develop ulcers and erosions) and thrombogenic—leading to sudden occlusion, emboli, and subclinical microemboli with the potential to recur over time. The bulk of this research, which was mostly in the coronary arteries, has led to a broad awareness in the cardiology community of the importance of plaque morphology and composition, in addition to the degree of stenosis, in influencing the risk of future ischemic events. The concept of “unstable” plaque, independent from the degree of stenosis, has been the basis for intensive research in high-resolution intravascular imaging platforms and aggressive therapeutic measures. More recently, advances in noninvasive imaging that improved visualization of plaque features such as hemorrhage, and a better understanding of the mechanism leading to thromboembolic events, have raised awareness within the stroke community about the concept of “vulnerable carotid plaque.” This has led to the identification of patients with mildly stenotic but vulnerable plaque and whose cases would otherwise have been diagnosed as strokes of “undetermined source.” In this article, we briefly summarize pathologic, imaging, and clinical criteria of unstable plaque in patients with mild carotid artery stenosis, with case examples.","PeriodicalId":91465,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.cne.0000723688.52449.d5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

predict the risk of future ischemic events in patients with carotid artery stenosis based on ultrasound findings that assessed morphology and composition of plaque. However, with publication of landmark clinical trials, leading to a definition of the indications for treatment of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, the focus was exclusively on the degree of stenosis rather than plaque morphology and composition. Therefore, over the past 30 years, decisions for invasive treatment have been based on degree of stenosis, and this is reflected in published guidelines. However, a growing body of scientific evidence suggests that a culprit plaque is not necessarily large and causing “clinically significant stenosis,” but vulnerable (ie, prone to rupture or to develop ulcers and erosions) and thrombogenic—leading to sudden occlusion, emboli, and subclinical microemboli with the potential to recur over time. The bulk of this research, which was mostly in the coronary arteries, has led to a broad awareness in the cardiology community of the importance of plaque morphology and composition, in addition to the degree of stenosis, in influencing the risk of future ischemic events. The concept of “unstable” plaque, independent from the degree of stenosis, has been the basis for intensive research in high-resolution intravascular imaging platforms and aggressive therapeutic measures. More recently, advances in noninvasive imaging that improved visualization of plaque features such as hemorrhage, and a better understanding of the mechanism leading to thromboembolic events, have raised awareness within the stroke community about the concept of “vulnerable carotid plaque.” This has led to the identification of patients with mildly stenotic but vulnerable plaque and whose cases would otherwise have been diagnosed as strokes of “undetermined source.” In this article, we briefly summarize pathologic, imaging, and clinical criteria of unstable plaque in patients with mild carotid artery stenosis, with case examples.
症状性轻度颈动脉狭窄
根据评估斑块形态和成分的超声检查结果,预测颈动脉狭窄患者未来发生缺血性事件的风险。然而,随着具有里程碑意义的临床试验的发表,有症状和无症状患者的治疗适应症得到了定义,重点只放在狭窄程度上,而不是斑块的形态和成分上。因此,在过去的30年里,侵入性治疗的决定都是基于狭窄程度,这反映在已发布的指南中。然而,越来越多的科学证据表明,罪魁祸首斑块不一定很大,会导致“临床上显著的狭窄”,而是很脆弱(即容易破裂或发展为溃疡和侵蚀)和血栓形成——导致突然闭塞、栓塞和亚临床微栓子,并有可能随着时间的推移复发。这项研究主要针对冠状动脉,使心脏病学界广泛认识到斑块形态和成分以及狭窄程度在影响未来缺血性事件风险方面的重要性。“不稳定”斑块的概念与狭窄程度无关,是高分辨率血管内成像平台和积极治疗措施深入研究的基础。最近,非侵入性成像的进展改善了斑块特征(如出血)的可视化,并更好地了解了导致血栓栓塞事件的机制,提高了中风社区对“易受感染颈动脉斑块”概念的认识。这导致了轻度狭窄但易受感染斑块的患者的识别,否则其病例将被诊断为“来源不明”的中风。在这篇文章中,我们简要总结了轻度颈动脉狭窄患者不稳定斑块的病理、影像学和临床标准,并附例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信