Status of China’s hospital rankings and its impact on hospital discipline construction

B. Peng, Lingling Yu, Miao Miao, Suowei Wu, Huifang Zhang, Pengjun Zhang
{"title":"Status of China’s hospital rankings and its impact on hospital discipline construction","authors":"B. Peng, Lingling Yu, Miao Miao, Suowei Wu, Huifang Zhang, Pengjun Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nThrough combing and analyzing the existing hospital rankings in China, comparing the similarities, differences and problems of existing rankings, to improve the hospital's understanding of the ranking work, and provide reference for hospital discipline construction and development. \n \n \nMethods \nTo comprehensively review and compare the major ranking of hospitals in China, such as \" China's Hospital Rankings\" , \" China's Hospitals · Competitiveness Rankings\" , \" Ranking of the Best Clinical Subjects in China\" , \" China Hospitals' Science and Technology Evaluation Metrics\" and \" Beijing Medical Service and Key Specialist Evaluation\" , and to analyze from the angle of the background, characteristics, evaluation methods, evaluation dimension and so on. \n \n \nResults \nAt present, the hospital rankings have their own characteristics, each with its own focus, but there is still poor accessibility of clinical data, and the evaluation index of patients' medical experience and educational work are not perfect. \n \n \nConclusions \nThe hospital ranking list is a third-party evaluation tool to promote the construction of hospital disciplines effectively. It is recommended that all relevant organizations or departments further improve the construction of the ranking system, build big data platforms for hospital evaluation, improve the data accessibility of clinical medical quality and safety indicators, build scientific and objective dynamic evaluation systems, and carry out multi-level, multi-dimensional and continuous hospital ranking work. \n \n \nKey words: \nHospital ranking; Discipline construction; Discipline evaluation; Hospital evaluation","PeriodicalId":59555,"journal":{"name":"中华医学科研管理杂志","volume":"32 1","pages":"119-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学科研管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.02.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Through combing and analyzing the existing hospital rankings in China, comparing the similarities, differences and problems of existing rankings, to improve the hospital's understanding of the ranking work, and provide reference for hospital discipline construction and development. Methods To comprehensively review and compare the major ranking of hospitals in China, such as " China's Hospital Rankings" , " China's Hospitals · Competitiveness Rankings" , " Ranking of the Best Clinical Subjects in China" , " China Hospitals' Science and Technology Evaluation Metrics" and " Beijing Medical Service and Key Specialist Evaluation" , and to analyze from the angle of the background, characteristics, evaluation methods, evaluation dimension and so on. Results At present, the hospital rankings have their own characteristics, each with its own focus, but there is still poor accessibility of clinical data, and the evaluation index of patients' medical experience and educational work are not perfect. Conclusions The hospital ranking list is a third-party evaluation tool to promote the construction of hospital disciplines effectively. It is recommended that all relevant organizations or departments further improve the construction of the ranking system, build big data platforms for hospital evaluation, improve the data accessibility of clinical medical quality and safety indicators, build scientific and objective dynamic evaluation systems, and carry out multi-level, multi-dimensional and continuous hospital ranking work. Key words: Hospital ranking; Discipline construction; Discipline evaluation; Hospital evaluation
中国医院排名现状及其对医院学科建设的影响
目的通过对我国现有医院排名的梳理和分析,比较现有排名的异同和存在的问题,提高医院对排名工作的认识,为医院学科建设和发展提供参考。方法对“中国医院排名”、“中国医院·竞争力排名”、《中国最佳临床学科排名》、《中国医院科技评价指标》和《北京市医疗服务和重点专科医生评价》等中国主要医院排名进行全面回顾和比较,并从背景、特点、评价方法、评价维度等角度进行分析。结论医院排行榜是有效促进医院学科建设的第三方评价工具。建议各相关组织或部门进一步完善排名体系建设,搭建医院评价大数据平台,提高临床医疗质量安全指标的数据可及性,构建科学客观的动态评价体系,开展多层次、多维度、连续性的医院排名工作。关键词:医院排名;学科建设;学科评估;医院评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3322
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信