PENERAPAN KOMBINASI METODE SAW DAN TOPSIS DALAM MENENTUKAN DOMPET DIGITAL TERBAIK (STUDI KASUS: KOTA SURABAYA)

Siti Nur Fadilah, R. Sulaiman
{"title":"PENERAPAN KOMBINASI METODE SAW DAN TOPSIS DALAM MENENTUKAN DOMPET DIGITAL TERBAIK (STUDI KASUS: KOTA SURABAYA)","authors":"Siti Nur Fadilah, R. Sulaiman","doi":"10.26740/mathunesa.v11n2.p147-155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, various types of digital wallets are present in society with various advantages and facilities offered. This is in line with life in the digital era, where the increasing use of digital wallets is in every daily activity, especially in Surabaya. However, the existence of a variety of digital wallet choices can cause a problem, where people can have difficulty considering the selection of the best digital wallet that will be used in their daily lives. So to overcome these problems, it is necessary to conduct a study that aims to identify which digital wallet is the best in the Surabaya city area in the hope that it can help and provide recommendations to the wider society, especially the people of Surabaya in determining the best digital wallet. The criteria used in this study are convenience, promotion, security, service features, and benefits. The alternatives used in this study are GoPay, DANA, OVO, ShopeePay, and LinkAja. The decisionmaking method applied in this study is a combination of the SAW and the TOPSIS method. The stage begins by applying the SAW method which produces a normalized matrix R, then continued by applying the TOPSIS method to obtain alternative ranking. The results of this study show that ShopeePay is the best digital wallet with the highest preference value of 0.997, followed by other digital wallets namely OVO, GoPay, DANA and LinkAja. ","PeriodicalId":31823,"journal":{"name":"Mathunesa Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathunesa Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26740/mathunesa.v11n2.p147-155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, various types of digital wallets are present in society with various advantages and facilities offered. This is in line with life in the digital era, where the increasing use of digital wallets is in every daily activity, especially in Surabaya. However, the existence of a variety of digital wallet choices can cause a problem, where people can have difficulty considering the selection of the best digital wallet that will be used in their daily lives. So to overcome these problems, it is necessary to conduct a study that aims to identify which digital wallet is the best in the Surabaya city area in the hope that it can help and provide recommendations to the wider society, especially the people of Surabaya in determining the best digital wallet. The criteria used in this study are convenience, promotion, security, service features, and benefits. The alternatives used in this study are GoPay, DANA, OVO, ShopeePay, and LinkAja. The decisionmaking method applied in this study is a combination of the SAW and the TOPSIS method. The stage begins by applying the SAW method which produces a normalized matrix R, then continued by applying the TOPSIS method to obtain alternative ranking. The results of this study show that ShopeePay is the best digital wallet with the highest preference value of 0.997, followed by other digital wallets namely OVO, GoPay, DANA and LinkAja. 
采用组合方法锯子和TOPSIS来确定最佳数字钱包(案例研究:泗水市)
目前,社会上出现了各种类型的数字钱包,提供了各种优势和设施。这符合数字时代的生活,数字钱包的使用越来越多地出现在日常活动中,尤其是在泗水。然而,各种数字钱包选择的存在可能会导致一个问题,人们可能很难考虑选择最好的数字钱包,将在他们的日常生活中使用。因此,为了克服这些问题,有必要进行一项研究,旨在确定哪个数字钱包是泗水市区最好的,希望它可以帮助和提供建议给更广泛的社会,特别是泗水人民在确定最好的数字钱包。本研究使用的标准是便利性、推广性、安全性、服务特性和效益。在本研究中使用的替代方案是GoPay, DANA, OVO, shopepay和LinkAja。本研究采用的决策方法是SAW和TOPSIS相结合的方法。该阶段首先应用SAW方法产生归一化矩阵R,然后继续应用TOPSIS方法获得备选排名。本研究结果显示,ShopeePay是最好的数字钱包,其偏好值最高,为0.997,其次是OVO、GoPay、DANA和LinkAja。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书