Enabling difficult conversations in the Australian health sector

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
C. King, B. Williams
{"title":"Enabling difficult conversations in the Australian health sector","authors":"C. King, B. Williams","doi":"10.37464/2020.383.310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Research on difficult conversations is mainly about the impacts of avoiding difficult conversations, with little research on enabling difficult conversations except for improving communication. Objective: This study aimed to identify the ideal environment for enabling difficult conversations to take place in healthcare settings. Methods: Convergent Interviewing was used with 20 clinical supervisors to explore the following question: “What enables healthcare professionals in the workplace to have difficult conversations?” Of these 20 clinical supervisors, 10 were nurses, eight were in allied health (five speech pathologists, two physiotherapists, one community support worker) and two were in medicine. Results: Enabling difficult conversations is complex and requires change at the individual, team, profession, and organisational levels. Enabling these conversations is not as simple as improving communication skills, although effective communication skills are necessary. Discussion: Other requirements include the desire for someone to want to have a difficult conversation. This relationship exists between the people needing to have the conversation, the physical environment and time required to have the conversation, and also having management, disciplinary and organisational support to engage in difficult conversations. Conclusion: Enabling difficult conversations between healthcare professionals is a complicated endeavour involving individual, team, profession, and organisational changes. This implies making a significant effort in presenting training and educational opportunities for all health professionals.\nWhat is already known about the topic?\n\nPoor communication is a key contributor to medical errors.\nWhile clinical supervisors need to have difficult conversations with peers, patients and managers, many supervisors lack the skills to adequately perform these on a regular basis.\n\nWhat this paper adds:\n\nHaving difficult conversations between healthcare professionals is complex.\nThat focussing on ‘enabling’ is a more proactive and positive approach than focusing on ‘avoiding’.","PeriodicalId":55584,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37464/2020.383.310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research on difficult conversations is mainly about the impacts of avoiding difficult conversations, with little research on enabling difficult conversations except for improving communication. Objective: This study aimed to identify the ideal environment for enabling difficult conversations to take place in healthcare settings. Methods: Convergent Interviewing was used with 20 clinical supervisors to explore the following question: “What enables healthcare professionals in the workplace to have difficult conversations?” Of these 20 clinical supervisors, 10 were nurses, eight were in allied health (five speech pathologists, two physiotherapists, one community support worker) and two were in medicine. Results: Enabling difficult conversations is complex and requires change at the individual, team, profession, and organisational levels. Enabling these conversations is not as simple as improving communication skills, although effective communication skills are necessary. Discussion: Other requirements include the desire for someone to want to have a difficult conversation. This relationship exists between the people needing to have the conversation, the physical environment and time required to have the conversation, and also having management, disciplinary and organisational support to engage in difficult conversations. Conclusion: Enabling difficult conversations between healthcare professionals is a complicated endeavour involving individual, team, profession, and organisational changes. This implies making a significant effort in presenting training and educational opportunities for all health professionals. What is already known about the topic? Poor communication is a key contributor to medical errors. While clinical supervisors need to have difficult conversations with peers, patients and managers, many supervisors lack the skills to adequately perform these on a regular basis. What this paper adds: Having difficult conversations between healthcare professionals is complex. That focussing on ‘enabling’ is a more proactive and positive approach than focusing on ‘avoiding’.
促成澳大利亚卫生部门的艰难对话
背景:关于困难对话的研究主要是关于避免困难对话的影响,除了改善沟通之外,很少有关于实现困难对话的研究。目的:本研究旨在确定在医疗环境中进行困难对话的理想环境。方法:采用融合访谈法对20名临床主管进行访谈,探讨以下问题:“是什么导致医护人员在工作场所进行困难的谈话?”在这20名临床监督员中,10名是护士,8名在联合医疗机构工作(5名语言病理学家、2名物理治疗师、1名社区支持工作者),2名在医学部门工作。结果:实现困难的对话是复杂的,需要在个人、团队、专业和组织层面进行改变。实现这些对话并不像提高沟通技巧那么简单,尽管有效的沟通技巧是必要的。讨论:其他要求包括某人想要进行艰难的对话。这种关系存在于需要进行对话的人,进行对话所需的物理环境和时间,以及管理,纪律和组织支持进行困难的对话之间。结论:在医疗保健专业人员之间进行困难的对话是一项涉及个人、团队、专业和组织变化的复杂努力。这意味着要作出重大努力,为所有保健专业人员提供培训和教育机会。关于这个话题我们已经知道了什么?沟通不畅是造成医疗事故的主要原因。虽然临床主管需要与同事、患者和管理人员进行困难的对话,但许多主管缺乏定期充分执行这些对话的技能。本文补充的内容:医疗专业人员之间进行艰难的对话是复杂的。专注于“促成”比专注于“避免”是一种更主动、更积极的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to nursing and midwifery practice, health- maternity- and aged- care delivery, public health, healthcare policy and funding, nursing and midwifery education, regulation, management, economics, ethics, and research methodology. Further, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the art and spirit of nursing and midwifery. As the official peer-reviewed journal of the ANMF, AJAN is dedicated to publishing and showcasing scholarly material of principal relevance to national nursing and midwifery professional, clinical, research, education, management, and policy audiences. Beyond AJAN’s primarily national focus, manuscripts with regional and international scope are also welcome where their contribution to knowledge and debate on key issues for nursing, midwifery, and healthcare more broadly are significant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信