Domestic institutions, growth and global justice

IF 1.3 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE

European Journal of Political Theory Pub Date : 2021-05-17 DOI:10.1177/14748851211015328

Chris Armstrong

引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to one prominent theory of development, a country’s wealth is primarily explained by the quality of its institutions. Leaning on that view, several political theorists have defended two normative conclusions. The first is that we have no reason for concern, from the point of view of justice, if some countries have greater natural resource endowments than others. The second is that proposals for redistribution across borders are likely to be superfluous. Advocates of global redistribution have not yet grappled with these momentous arguments, or shown whether, and how, they might be rebuffed. This article does just that.

查看原文本刊更多论文

国内机构、增长和全球正义

根据一个著名的发展理论，一个国家的财富主要由其制度的质量来解释。基于这一观点，一些政治理论家为两个规范性结论进行了辩护。首先，从正义的角度来看，如果一些国家拥有比其他国家更多的自然资源禀赋，我们没有理由担心。第二，跨境再分配的提议可能是多余的。全球再分配的倡导者还没有与这些重大论点作斗争，也没有表明这些论点是否会被拒绝，以及如何被拒绝。这篇文章就是这么做的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Journal of Political Theory POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

9.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of Political Theory provides a high profile research forum. Broad in scope and international in readership, the Journal is named after its geographical location, but is committed to advancing original debates in political theory in the widest possible sense--geographical, historical, and ideological. The Journal publishes contributions in analytic political philosophy, political theory, comparative political thought, and the history of ideas of any tradition. Work that challenges orthodoxies and disrupts entrenched debates is particularly encouraged. All research articles are subject to triple-blind peer-review by internationally renowned scholars in order to ensure the highest standards of quality and impartiality.