Reproductive travel to, from and within sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review

Q1 Social Sciences
Tessa Moll , Trudie Gerrits , Karin Hammarberg , Lenore Manderson , Andrea Whittaker
{"title":"Reproductive travel to, from and within sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review","authors":"Tessa Moll ,&nbsp;Trudie Gerrits ,&nbsp;Karin Hammarberg ,&nbsp;Lenore Manderson ,&nbsp;Andrea Whittaker","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Scholarly interest in reproductive travel has increased in recent years, but travel within, to and from the African continent has received much less attention. We reviewed the literature on cross-border reproductive travel to and from countries of sub-Saharan Africa in order to understand the local forms of this trade. Access to fertility care remains deeply stratified, which is an ongoing concern in a region with some of the highest rates of infertility. We found a wide variety of reasons for reproductive travel, including a lack of trusted local clinics. Destinations were chosen for reasons including historical movements for medical treatment broadly, diasporic circulations, pragmatic language reasons, and ties of former colonial relations. We describe the unique tempos of treatment in the region, ranging from some intended parents staying in receiving countries for some years to the short-term contingent support networks that reprotravellers develop during their treatment and travel. Unique to the region is the movement of medical professionals, such as the ‘fly-in, fly-out’ clinic staff to deliver fertility care. Future research should include practices and movements to presently neglected ‘reprohubs’, particularly Kenya and Nigeria; the impact of pandemic-related lockdowns and border closures on the movements of intended parents, reproductive assistors and reproductive material; and the impact of low-cost protocols on treatment access within the region. This scoping review provides insight into the relevant work on cross-border reproductive care in sub-Saharan Africa, where a unique combination of access factors, affordability, and sociocultural and geopolitical issues fashion individuals’ and couples’ cross-border reproductive travel within, to and from Africa.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 271-288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661822000028/pdfft?md5=ad78a21661990f9eafb7327543434c0d&pid=1-s2.0-S2405661822000028-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661822000028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Scholarly interest in reproductive travel has increased in recent years, but travel within, to and from the African continent has received much less attention. We reviewed the literature on cross-border reproductive travel to and from countries of sub-Saharan Africa in order to understand the local forms of this trade. Access to fertility care remains deeply stratified, which is an ongoing concern in a region with some of the highest rates of infertility. We found a wide variety of reasons for reproductive travel, including a lack of trusted local clinics. Destinations were chosen for reasons including historical movements for medical treatment broadly, diasporic circulations, pragmatic language reasons, and ties of former colonial relations. We describe the unique tempos of treatment in the region, ranging from some intended parents staying in receiving countries for some years to the short-term contingent support networks that reprotravellers develop during their treatment and travel. Unique to the region is the movement of medical professionals, such as the ‘fly-in, fly-out’ clinic staff to deliver fertility care. Future research should include practices and movements to presently neglected ‘reprohubs’, particularly Kenya and Nigeria; the impact of pandemic-related lockdowns and border closures on the movements of intended parents, reproductive assistors and reproductive material; and the impact of low-cost protocols on treatment access within the region. This scoping review provides insight into the relevant work on cross-border reproductive care in sub-Saharan Africa, where a unique combination of access factors, affordability, and sociocultural and geopolitical issues fashion individuals’ and couples’ cross-border reproductive travel within, to and from Africa.

往返撒哈拉以南非洲和撒哈拉以南非洲内部的生殖旅行:范围审查
近年来,学术界对生殖旅行的兴趣有所增加,但在非洲大陆内部和往返非洲大陆的旅行受到的关注要少得多。我们回顾了有关撒哈拉以南非洲国家跨境生殖旅行的文献,以了解这种贸易的当地形式。获得生育护理的机会仍然严重分层,这是一个不育率最高的地区持续关注的问题。我们发现了生育旅行的各种各样的原因,包括缺乏值得信赖的当地诊所。选择目的地的原因包括广泛的医疗历史运动、散居流动、实用语言原因以及前殖民地关系的联系。我们描述了该地区独特的治疗节奏,从一些意向父母在接收国停留数年,到再旅行者在治疗和旅行期间形成的短期应急支持网络。该地区的独特之处在于医疗专业人员的流动,例如提供生育护理的“飞进飞出”诊所工作人员。未来的研究应该包括目前被忽视的“责备国”的实践和运动,特别是肯尼亚和尼日利亚;与大流行病有关的封锁和边境关闭对准父母、生殖辅助人员和生殖材料流动的影响;以及低成本协议对该地区治疗可及性的影响。这一范围审查提供了对撒哈拉以南非洲跨境生殖保健相关工作的深入了解,在撒哈拉以南非洲,获得因素、可负担性以及社会文化和地缘政治问题的独特组合影响了个人和夫妇在非洲境内、进出非洲的跨境生殖旅行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: RBMS is a new journal dedicated to interdisciplinary discussion and debate of the rapidly expanding field of reproductive biomedicine, particularly all of its many societal and cultural implications. It is intended to bring to attention new research in the social sciences, arts and humanities on human reproduction, new reproductive technologies, and related areas such as human embryonic stem cell derivation. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, policy makers, academics and patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信