When patients probe the analyst: Manifestations of patient testing and its complexity – An in-depth exploration of case examples of extant research

IF 0.9 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS
A. Novak, Jonas Luedemann, S. Andreas
{"title":"When patients probe the analyst: Manifestations of patient testing and its complexity – An in-depth exploration of case examples of extant research","authors":"A. Novak, Jonas Luedemann, S. Andreas","doi":"10.1080/0803706X.2022.2075564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Patients probe the analyst with the goal of challenging pathogenic adaptations to early experiences. As the core concept of control mastery theory (CMT), testing is contextualized within psychoanalytic theory. The current work examines 29 articles illustrating therapies performed or analyzed using the CMT approach for the occurrence of testing, which takes place through interaction, self-presentation, narratives, or the use of the setting. The various manifestations of testing and their potential meanings are described. An in-depth analysis of selected testing examples is performed to compare tests within patients and across studies. The results show that patients differ in their testing strategies, shift testing strategy during the process of treatment, combine tests, and test multiple conflictual themes within a single test. Therefore, the importance of applying a case-specific approach, based on a thorough understanding of a patient, becomes evident. Recommendations concerning psychoanalytic technique, including the role of interpretation, as illustrated in case vignettes, are introduced.","PeriodicalId":43212,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Psychoanalysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0803706X.2022.2075564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Patients probe the analyst with the goal of challenging pathogenic adaptations to early experiences. As the core concept of control mastery theory (CMT), testing is contextualized within psychoanalytic theory. The current work examines 29 articles illustrating therapies performed or analyzed using the CMT approach for the occurrence of testing, which takes place through interaction, self-presentation, narratives, or the use of the setting. The various manifestations of testing and their potential meanings are described. An in-depth analysis of selected testing examples is performed to compare tests within patients and across studies. The results show that patients differ in their testing strategies, shift testing strategy during the process of treatment, combine tests, and test multiple conflictual themes within a single test. Therefore, the importance of applying a case-specific approach, based on a thorough understanding of a patient, becomes evident. Recommendations concerning psychoanalytic technique, including the role of interpretation, as illustrated in case vignettes, are introduced.
当患者探究分析师:患者测试的表现及其复杂性-对现有研究案例的深入探索
摘要患者询问分析员的目的是挑战病原学对早期经历的适应。作为控制掌握理论(CMT)的核心概念,测试在精神分析理论中是情境化的。目前的工作审查了29篇文章,阐述了使用CMT方法进行或分析的治疗方法,以进行测试,测试通过互动、自我展示、叙述或使用环境进行。描述了测试的各种表现形式及其潜在意义。对选定的测试实例进行深入分析,以比较患者内部和研究之间的测试。结果表明,患者在测试策略、治疗过程中改变测试策略、组合测试以及在一次测试中测试多个冲突主题方面存在差异。因此,在充分了解患者的基础上,应用针对具体病例的方法的重要性变得显而易见。如案例小插曲所示,介绍了有关精神分析技术的建议,包括解释的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Forum of Psychoanalysis
International Forum of Psychoanalysis PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信