NEBC Meeting News

Pub Date : 2023-03-03 DOI:10.3119/0035-4902-123.996.444
Karen Hirschberg
{"title":"NEBC Meeting News","authors":"Karen Hirschberg","doi":"10.3119/0035-4902-123.996.444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The New England Botanical Club convened its 1153rd meeting virtually on Saturday, October 2, 2021. Treasurer Robert Wernerehl introduced the speaker, Dr. Christopher Neill, Senior Scientist at the Woodwell Climate Research Center in Falmouth, Massachusetts, whose presentation was titled “Plant Responses and Ecosystem Resilience Following Restoration of Former Cranberry Bogs.” Dr. Neill is interested in the use of ecosystem restoration to combat climate change. The restoration of cranberry bogs is a shining example of what we can accomplish by managing natural spaces for carbon sequestration and other ecosystem services, and for biodiversity. Cranberries are a global commodity. Massachusetts was the leading producer of cranberries until the 1990s when Wisconsin expanded its production using modern, high-yield varieties grown in massive commercial facilities. In Massachusetts traditional cranberry production uses natural bogs that are flooded from rivers and streams (flow-through bogs) and other natural wetlands planted with older varieties of cranberries. These traditional bogs are less productive and harder to manage than the modern facilities, thus less competitive. The Massachusetts cranberry industry is transitioning to production in more efficient man-made upland bogs to increase efficiency and productivity, providing opportunities for restoration of some traditional bogs as they are retired. Dr. Neill and collaborators mapped out the types and status of Massachusetts cranberry bogs in eastern Massachusetts and found that 20% are traditional flow-through bogs, 35% are traditional wetland bogs, and 45% are upland or newly renovated for modern production methods. The flow-through bogs and some of the traditional wetland bogs will not be renovated and will go to restoration. Based on their analysis, several thousand acres of cranberry bogs could be retired within a decade, so have a high potential for future restoration. Dr. Neill and his collaborators are documenting differences between passive and active restoration of cranberry bogs at six bog restoration sites. Passive restoration— cessation of farming activities and reliance on natural restoration processes—was compared with active restoration projects where actions were taken to restore soil and hydrologic conditions to meet ecosystem and biodiversity goals. They established 3 × 3 m quadrats, identifying all plants and noting life form, native vs. non-native and wetland indicator status. Retired bogs that were left to restore passively were dominated by native species, initially forbs and graminoids (e.g., switchgrass, woolgrass), then vines, shrubs, and trees (pitch pine, red maple) increased over time and canopy closure occurred after about 20 years. Cranberries gradually die out as taller cover increases. The vegetative community becomes dominated by facultative species, generalists that grow equally well in wetland or upland. Ecosystem services provided in these bogs over time include increased carbon storage in both soils and vegetation.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3119/0035-4902-123.996.444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The New England Botanical Club convened its 1153rd meeting virtually on Saturday, October 2, 2021. Treasurer Robert Wernerehl introduced the speaker, Dr. Christopher Neill, Senior Scientist at the Woodwell Climate Research Center in Falmouth, Massachusetts, whose presentation was titled “Plant Responses and Ecosystem Resilience Following Restoration of Former Cranberry Bogs.” Dr. Neill is interested in the use of ecosystem restoration to combat climate change. The restoration of cranberry bogs is a shining example of what we can accomplish by managing natural spaces for carbon sequestration and other ecosystem services, and for biodiversity. Cranberries are a global commodity. Massachusetts was the leading producer of cranberries until the 1990s when Wisconsin expanded its production using modern, high-yield varieties grown in massive commercial facilities. In Massachusetts traditional cranberry production uses natural bogs that are flooded from rivers and streams (flow-through bogs) and other natural wetlands planted with older varieties of cranberries. These traditional bogs are less productive and harder to manage than the modern facilities, thus less competitive. The Massachusetts cranberry industry is transitioning to production in more efficient man-made upland bogs to increase efficiency and productivity, providing opportunities for restoration of some traditional bogs as they are retired. Dr. Neill and collaborators mapped out the types and status of Massachusetts cranberry bogs in eastern Massachusetts and found that 20% are traditional flow-through bogs, 35% are traditional wetland bogs, and 45% are upland or newly renovated for modern production methods. The flow-through bogs and some of the traditional wetland bogs will not be renovated and will go to restoration. Based on their analysis, several thousand acres of cranberry bogs could be retired within a decade, so have a high potential for future restoration. Dr. Neill and his collaborators are documenting differences between passive and active restoration of cranberry bogs at six bog restoration sites. Passive restoration— cessation of farming activities and reliance on natural restoration processes—was compared with active restoration projects where actions were taken to restore soil and hydrologic conditions to meet ecosystem and biodiversity goals. They established 3 × 3 m quadrats, identifying all plants and noting life form, native vs. non-native and wetland indicator status. Retired bogs that were left to restore passively were dominated by native species, initially forbs and graminoids (e.g., switchgrass, woolgrass), then vines, shrubs, and trees (pitch pine, red maple) increased over time and canopy closure occurred after about 20 years. Cranberries gradually die out as taller cover increases. The vegetative community becomes dominated by facultative species, generalists that grow equally well in wetland or upland. Ecosystem services provided in these bogs over time include increased carbon storage in both soils and vegetation.
分享
查看原文
NEBC会议新闻
新英格兰植物俱乐部于2021年10月2日星期六召开了第1153次虚拟会议。财务主管Robert Wernerehl介绍了演讲者Christopher Neill博士,他是马萨诸塞州法尔茅斯伍德威尔气候研究中心的高级科学家,他的演讲题目是“恢复前蔓越莓沼泽后的植物反应和生态系统恢复力”。尼尔博士对利用生态系统恢复来应对气候变化很感兴趣。蔓越莓沼泽的恢复是一个光辉的例子,表明我们可以通过管理自然空间来实现碳封存和其他生态系统服务,以及生物多样性。蔓越莓是一种全球性的商品。马萨诸塞州一直是蔓越莓的主要产地,直到20世纪90年代,威斯康星州扩大了蔓越莓的生产,在大型商业设施中种植了现代高产品种。在马萨诸塞州,传统的蔓越莓生产利用从河流和溪流中淹没的天然沼泽(流经沼泽)和其他自然湿地,种植更老的蔓越莓品种。与现代设施相比,这些传统的沼泽生产力较低,更难管理,因此竞争力较弱。马萨诸塞州蔓越莓产业正在向更高效的人造高地沼泽过渡,以提高效率和生产力,为一些传统沼泽的恢复提供了机会,因为它们已经退役。尼尔博士和合作者绘制了马萨诸塞州东部蔓越莓沼泽的类型和现状,发现20%是传统的流水沼泽,35%是传统的湿地沼泽,45%是高地或为现代生产方法而新改造的沼泽。径流沼泽和部分传统湿地沼泽将不再进行改造,进入恢复阶段。根据他们的分析,数千英亩的蔓越莓沼泽可能会在十年内消失,因此未来恢复的潜力很大。尼尔博士和他的合作者在六个沼泽恢复地点记录了被动和主动恢复蔓越莓沼泽的差异。被动恢复——停止农耕活动并依赖自然恢复过程——与主动恢复项目进行了比较,主动恢复项目采取行动恢复土壤和水文条件,以满足生态系统和生物多样性的目标。他们建立了3 × 3米的样方,识别所有植物,记录生命形式、原生与非原生以及湿地指标状况。被动恢复的沼泽被本地物种主导,最初是草本植物和禾草类(如柳枝稷、羊草),然后是藤蔓、灌木和树木(沥青松、红枫)随着时间的推移而增加,大约20年后发生冠层关闭。蔓越莓随着高覆盖物的增加而逐渐消亡。植物群落以兼性物种为主,它们在湿地和高地都能很好地生长。随着时间的推移,这些沼泽提供的生态系统服务包括增加土壤和植被的碳储量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信