Coaching Elementary Teachers in Literacy: Does Feedback Type Matter for Low Implementers?

Elizabeth A. Cutrer-Párraga, E. Miller, Erjola Gjini, Melia Fonoimoana Garrett
{"title":"Coaching Elementary Teachers in Literacy: Does Feedback Type Matter for Low Implementers?","authors":"Elizabeth A. Cutrer-Párraga, E. Miller, Erjola Gjini, Melia Fonoimoana Garrett","doi":"10.11114/jets.v11i3.5975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For literacy coaches and teachers, feedback is an integral component of effective coaching. Yet, little is understood about the interaction between feedback and high/low implementing teachers within coaching sessions. This multiple case study explored the types of feedback literacy coaches provided both high and low implementing teachers over a two-year period. In the first year, the literacy coaches provided at least twice as much instructional feedback as emotional feedback to low-implementing teachers. Those teachers not only received more feedback in general, but the feedback they received was primarily what they needed to do to improve. In contrast, during the same period literacy coaches provided high-implementing teachers more emotional feedback than instructional feedback. Low implementation, or resistance, observed in this study may have been tied to the overwhelming amount and type of feedback the low implementing teachers received.  Coaches seeking to enhance instructional practices could benefit from attending to the amount and type of feedback they provide their learners. ","PeriodicalId":89971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education and training studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of education and training studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v11i3.5975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For literacy coaches and teachers, feedback is an integral component of effective coaching. Yet, little is understood about the interaction between feedback and high/low implementing teachers within coaching sessions. This multiple case study explored the types of feedback literacy coaches provided both high and low implementing teachers over a two-year period. In the first year, the literacy coaches provided at least twice as much instructional feedback as emotional feedback to low-implementing teachers. Those teachers not only received more feedback in general, but the feedback they received was primarily what they needed to do to improve. In contrast, during the same period literacy coaches provided high-implementing teachers more emotional feedback than instructional feedback. Low implementation, or resistance, observed in this study may have been tied to the overwhelming amount and type of feedback the low implementing teachers received.  Coaches seeking to enhance instructional practices could benefit from attending to the amount and type of feedback they provide their learners. 
指导小学教师识字:反馈类型对低执行者重要吗?
对于识字教练和教师来说,反馈是有效辅导的一个组成部分。然而,在辅导课程中,人们对反馈和高/低执行教师之间的互动知之甚少。这项多案例研究探讨了在两年的时间里,识字教练为高水平和低水平的实施教师提供的反馈类型。在第一年,识字教练向执行能力差的教师提供的教学反馈至少是情感反馈的两倍。这些教师不仅总体上收到了更多的反馈,而且他们收到的反馈主要是他们需要做的改进。相比之下,在同一时期,识字教练为执行力强的教师提供了更多的情感反馈,而不是教学反馈。本研究中观察到的低执行力或阻力可能与低执行力教师收到的压倒性数量和类型的反馈有关。寻求加强教学实践的教练可以从关注他们为学习者提供的反馈的数量和类型中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信