Novel Clinimetric Toolset to Quantify the Stability of Blood Pressure and Its Application to Evaluate Cardiovascular Function After Spinal Cord Injury

Samineh Mesbah, Bonnie E. Legg Ditterline, Siqi Wang, Samuel Wu, J. Weir, J. Wecht, G. Forrest, S. Harkema, B. Ugiliweneza
{"title":"Novel Clinimetric Toolset to Quantify the Stability of Blood Pressure and Its Application to Evaluate Cardiovascular Function After Spinal Cord Injury","authors":"Samineh Mesbah, Bonnie E. Legg Ditterline, Siqi Wang, Samuel Wu, J. Weir, J. Wecht, G. Forrest, S. Harkema, B. Ugiliweneza","doi":"10.3389/frans.2021.701891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Profound dysfunction of the cardiovascular system occurs after spinal cord injury (SCI), which is a leading cause of mortality in this population. Most individuals with chronic SCI experience transient episodes of hypotensive and hypertensive blood pressure in response to daily life activities. There are currently limited tools available to evaluate the stability of blood pressure with respect to a reference range. The aim of this study was to develop a clinimetric toolset for accurately quantifying stability of the blood pressure measurements and taking into consideration the complex dynamics of blood pressure variability among individuals with SCI. The proposed toolset is based on distribution of the blood pressure data points within and outside of the clinically recommended range. This toolset consists of six outcome measures including 1) total deviation of the 90% of the blood pressure data points from the center of the target range (115 mmHg); 2) The area under the cumulative distribution curve starting from the percentage of blood pressure measurements within the range, and the percentage of values within symmetrically expanded boundary ranges, above and below the target range; 3) the slope of the cumulative distribution curve that is calculated by fitting an exponential cumulative distribution function and the natural logarithm of its rate parameter; 4) its x- and 5) y-axis intercepts; and 6) the fitting error. These outcome measures were validated using blood pressure measurements recorded during cardiovascular perturbation tests and prolonged monitoring period from individuals with chronic SCI and non-injured controls. The statistical analysis based on the effect size and intra-class correlation coefficient, demonstrated that the proposed outcome measures fulfill reliability, responsiveness and discrimination criteria. The novel methodology proposed in this study is reliable and effective for evaluating the stability of continuous blood pressure in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury.","PeriodicalId":73063,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in analytical science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in analytical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frans.2021.701891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Profound dysfunction of the cardiovascular system occurs after spinal cord injury (SCI), which is a leading cause of mortality in this population. Most individuals with chronic SCI experience transient episodes of hypotensive and hypertensive blood pressure in response to daily life activities. There are currently limited tools available to evaluate the stability of blood pressure with respect to a reference range. The aim of this study was to develop a clinimetric toolset for accurately quantifying stability of the blood pressure measurements and taking into consideration the complex dynamics of blood pressure variability among individuals with SCI. The proposed toolset is based on distribution of the blood pressure data points within and outside of the clinically recommended range. This toolset consists of six outcome measures including 1) total deviation of the 90% of the blood pressure data points from the center of the target range (115 mmHg); 2) The area under the cumulative distribution curve starting from the percentage of blood pressure measurements within the range, and the percentage of values within symmetrically expanded boundary ranges, above and below the target range; 3) the slope of the cumulative distribution curve that is calculated by fitting an exponential cumulative distribution function and the natural logarithm of its rate parameter; 4) its x- and 5) y-axis intercepts; and 6) the fitting error. These outcome measures were validated using blood pressure measurements recorded during cardiovascular perturbation tests and prolonged monitoring period from individuals with chronic SCI and non-injured controls. The statistical analysis based on the effect size and intra-class correlation coefficient, demonstrated that the proposed outcome measures fulfill reliability, responsiveness and discrimination criteria. The novel methodology proposed in this study is reliable and effective for evaluating the stability of continuous blood pressure in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury.
量化脊髓损伤后血压稳定性的新型临床测量工具及其在评估心血管功能中的应用
严重的心血管系统功能障碍发生在脊髓损伤(SCI)之后,这是该人群死亡的主要原因。大多数慢性SCI患者在日常生活活动中会出现短暂的低血压和高血压发作。目前可用于评估血压相对于参考范围的稳定性的工具有限。本研究的目的是开发一个临床工具集,用于准确量化血压测量的稳定性,并考虑SCI患者血压变异的复杂动力学。所提出的工具集基于临床推荐范围内外的血压数据点的分布。该工具集由六个结果测量组成,包括1)90%的血压数据点与目标范围中心(115毫米汞柱)的总偏差;2) 从该范围内血压测量值的百分比开始的累积分布曲线下的面积,以及在目标范围上方和下方对称扩展的边界范围内的值的百分比;3) 通过拟合指数累积分布函数及其速率参数的自然对数来计算的累积分布曲线的斜率;4) 其x轴和5)y轴截距;以及6)拟合误差。使用心血管扰动测试期间记录的血压测量值和慢性SCI患者和非损伤对照组的延长监测期来验证这些结果测量值。基于效应大小和类内相关系数的统计分析表明,所提出的结果测量符合可靠性、响应性和判别标准。本研究中提出的新方法对于评估慢性脊髓损伤患者持续血压的稳定性是可靠和有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信