Developing a pan-European Person-centred Curriculum Framework: a whole systems approach

B. McCormack
{"title":"Developing a pan-European Person-centred Curriculum Framework: a whole systems approach","authors":"B. McCormack","doi":"10.19043/12suppl.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this special issue of the IPDJ we continue to present the work of the Erasmus+ project focusing on the development of a pan-European person-centred healthcare curriculum framework (Grant number: 2019-1-UK01-KA203-061970). In the previous special issue we presented the background to the project and the first stage of the work undertaken (a meta-synthesis of curricula, a review of developments in person-centred healthcare, and the philosophical and pedagogical principles to underpin a curriculum framework). In this follow-up special issue we are delighted to present the outputs from the next phases of this work and for the first time, present the finalised curriculum framework. The following three articles collectively describe and reflect on the methodology used to engage with key stakeholders and review existing curricula, as well as presenting the Person-centred Curriculum Framework itself. Over the past three years, we have been engaged in a pan-European collaborative effort to gain a deeper understanding of perspectives on person-centredness and how these perspectives shape our approaches to educating the future healthcare workforce. It has been argued many times that there are as many views about and perspectives on person-centredness as there are approaches to implementing person-oriented approaches to healthcare systems. It is of no surprise therefore, that when it comes to curriculum models for person-centred education, variation dominates. For those of us involved in healthcare professional education, we know there is little agreement about curriculum theories, curriculum models, or indeed curriculum content, within and between the different professions. We know that curricula are influenced by a variety of factors that are unique to different professions and disciplines; by different ontological positions, and by different constructions of knowledge and the kinds of knowledge that are relevant to each profession. All these conditions shape curriculum development and delivery, and should not be undermined in any attempt to develop multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary models of learning. A person-centred approach to curriculum development is best summed up by this quote from one of the stakeholders in the work reported in this special issue: ‘… because it helps you take that stage further, because you’re not looking at what’s the latest treatment for diabetes. It’s looking at what’s the latest treatment that would work for my diabetes or the person in front of his diabetes, rather than saying, oh, well, the evidence points to do this, do that.’","PeriodicalId":30387,"journal":{"name":"International Practice Development Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Practice Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19043/12suppl.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this special issue of the IPDJ we continue to present the work of the Erasmus+ project focusing on the development of a pan-European person-centred healthcare curriculum framework (Grant number: 2019-1-UK01-KA203-061970). In the previous special issue we presented the background to the project and the first stage of the work undertaken (a meta-synthesis of curricula, a review of developments in person-centred healthcare, and the philosophical and pedagogical principles to underpin a curriculum framework). In this follow-up special issue we are delighted to present the outputs from the next phases of this work and for the first time, present the finalised curriculum framework. The following three articles collectively describe and reflect on the methodology used to engage with key stakeholders and review existing curricula, as well as presenting the Person-centred Curriculum Framework itself. Over the past three years, we have been engaged in a pan-European collaborative effort to gain a deeper understanding of perspectives on person-centredness and how these perspectives shape our approaches to educating the future healthcare workforce. It has been argued many times that there are as many views about and perspectives on person-centredness as there are approaches to implementing person-oriented approaches to healthcare systems. It is of no surprise therefore, that when it comes to curriculum models for person-centred education, variation dominates. For those of us involved in healthcare professional education, we know there is little agreement about curriculum theories, curriculum models, or indeed curriculum content, within and between the different professions. We know that curricula are influenced by a variety of factors that are unique to different professions and disciplines; by different ontological positions, and by different constructions of knowledge and the kinds of knowledge that are relevant to each profession. All these conditions shape curriculum development and delivery, and should not be undermined in any attempt to develop multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary models of learning. A person-centred approach to curriculum development is best summed up by this quote from one of the stakeholders in the work reported in this special issue: ‘… because it helps you take that stage further, because you’re not looking at what’s the latest treatment for diabetes. It’s looking at what’s the latest treatment that would work for my diabetes or the person in front of his diabetes, rather than saying, oh, well, the evidence points to do this, do that.’
制定泛欧以人为本的课程框架:一种全系统的方法
在本期IPDJ特刊中,我们继续介绍伊拉斯谟+项目的工作,重点是开发泛欧以人为本的医疗保健课程框架(拨款编号:2019-1-UK01-KA203-061970)。在上一期特刊中,我们介绍了该项目的背景和所开展工作的第一阶段(课程的元综合,对以人为本的医疗保健发展的回顾,以及作为课程框架基础的哲学和教学原则)。在本期后续特刊中,我们很高兴介绍这项工作下一阶段的成果,并首次介绍最终的课程框架。以下三篇文章共同描述和反思了与关键利益相关者接触、审查现有课程以及介绍以人为本的课程框架本身所使用的方法。在过去的三年里,我们一直在进行泛欧合作,以更深入地了解以人为中心的观点,以及这些观点如何塑造我们教育未来医护人员的方法。人们多次认为,关于以人为本的观点和观点与在医疗保健系统中实施以人为本的方法一样多。因此,毫不奇怪,当涉及到以人为中心的教育的课程模式时,差异占主导地位。对于我们这些参与医疗保健专业教育的人来说,我们知道不同专业内部和之间在课程理论、课程模式或课程内容方面几乎没有达成一致。我们知道,课程受到不同专业和学科特有的各种因素的影响;通过不同的本体论立场,通过不同的知识结构和与每个专业相关的知识种类。所有这些条件都决定了课程的制定和实施,不应在任何发展多学科和跨学科学习模式的尝试中受到损害。本期特刊报道的工作中的一位利益相关者引用了一句话,最能概括以人为中心的课程开发方法:“……因为这有助于你进一步进入这个阶段,因为你没有考虑糖尿病的最新治疗方法。它关注的是对我的糖尿病或糖尿病患者有效的最新治疗方法,而不是说,哦,好吧,证据表明可以这样做,也可以那样做。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信