A Private Tree By-Law’s Contribution to Maintaining a Diverse Urban Forest: Exploring Homeowners’ Replanting Compliance and the Role of Construction Activities in Toronto, Canada

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Tenley M. Conway, Jihan Khatib, Janele Tetreult, Andrew D. Almas
{"title":"A Private Tree By-Law’s Contribution to Maintaining a Diverse Urban Forest: Exploring Homeowners’ Replanting Compliance and the Role of Construction Activities in Toronto, Canada","authors":"Tenley M. Conway, Jihan Khatib, Janele Tetreult, Andrew D. Almas","doi":"10.48044/jauf.2022.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many municipalities are working to protect and grow their urban forest, including adopting private tree regulations. Such regulations typically require property-owners to apply for a permit to remove trees and, if the permit is granted, plant replacement trees. Even with such regulations, many private trees are removed each year, particularly on residential property. Property-level construction activity, including expanding building footprints, replacing an older home with a new one, and increasing hardscaping, is emerging as a key driver of residential tree loss. This study addresses whether homeowners who receive a permit to remove one or more trees comply with the requirement to plant replacement trees to better understand the effect of private tree regulation. We explore this question through a written survey of homeowners who received a tree removal permit and site visits in Toronto (Ontario, Canada). While 70% of all survey participants planted the required replacement trees 2 to 3 years after receiving the permit, only 54% of homeowners whose permit was associated with construction planted. Additionally, most replacement trees were in good health but were dominated by a few genera. We also found significant differences in replacement planting and tree survival across the city’s 4 management districts. This study highlights that if resources supporting private tree regulations are limited, tree permits associated with construction should be prioritized for follow-up. Additionally, guidance about diverse species to plant should be communicated to ensure that private tree regulations are supporting the long-term protection of the urban forest.","PeriodicalId":39043,"journal":{"name":"Arboriculture and Urban Forestry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arboriculture and Urban Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2022.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Many municipalities are working to protect and grow their urban forest, including adopting private tree regulations. Such regulations typically require property-owners to apply for a permit to remove trees and, if the permit is granted, plant replacement trees. Even with such regulations, many private trees are removed each year, particularly on residential property. Property-level construction activity, including expanding building footprints, replacing an older home with a new one, and increasing hardscaping, is emerging as a key driver of residential tree loss. This study addresses whether homeowners who receive a permit to remove one or more trees comply with the requirement to plant replacement trees to better understand the effect of private tree regulation. We explore this question through a written survey of homeowners who received a tree removal permit and site visits in Toronto (Ontario, Canada). While 70% of all survey participants planted the required replacement trees 2 to 3 years after receiving the permit, only 54% of homeowners whose permit was associated with construction planted. Additionally, most replacement trees were in good health but were dominated by a few genera. We also found significant differences in replacement planting and tree survival across the city’s 4 management districts. This study highlights that if resources supporting private tree regulations are limited, tree permits associated with construction should be prioritized for follow-up. Additionally, guidance about diverse species to plant should be communicated to ensure that private tree regulations are supporting the long-term protection of the urban forest.
私人树木章程对维护多样化城市森林的贡献:探索加拿大多伦多房主的重新种植合规和建筑活动的作用
许多市政当局正在努力保护和发展城市森林,包括采用私人树木条例。这类规定通常要求业主申请砍伐树木的许可证,如果获得许可证,就要种植新的树木。即使有这样的规定,每年仍有许多私人树木被砍伐,特别是在住宅物业上。房地产层面的建设活动,包括扩大建筑足迹,以新房屋取代旧房屋,以及增加硬景观,正在成为住宅树木流失的主要驱动因素。为了更好地了解私人树木监管的影响,本研究探讨了获得许可移除一棵或多棵树木的房主是否遵守了种植替代树木的要求。我们通过对获得树木移除许可的房主的书面调查和在多伦多(加拿大安大略省)的实地考察来探讨这个问题。虽然70%的调查参与者在获得许可证的2到3年后种植了所需的替代树,但只有54%的房主在获得与建筑相关的许可证后种植了树木。此外,大多数替代树健康状况良好,但以少数属为主。我们还发现,在城市的4个管理区中,替代种植和树木存活率存在显著差异。本研究强调,如果支持私人树木法规的资源有限,则应优先考虑与建设相关的树木许可证。此外,应该传达关于种植多样化物种的指导,以确保私人树木法规支持对城市森林的长期保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arboriculture and Urban Forestry
Arboriculture and Urban Forestry Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信