Wartime EU: consequences of the Russia – Ukraine war on the enlargement process

IF 2.2 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Veronica Anghel, Jelena Džankić
{"title":"Wartime EU: consequences of the Russia – Ukraine war on the enlargement process","authors":"Veronica Anghel, Jelena Džankić","doi":"10.1080/07036337.2023.2190106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The European Union (EU) revived the enlargement process in response to the Russia-Ukraine war. That reaction compares to how the EU utilized this process following the wars in the Balkans in the 1990s. In this paper, we argue that on neither occasion was the inclusion of more states within EU borders a preferred EU working agenda. Instead, the EU used enlargement as a stabilization and security-building mechanism without guaranteeing membership as the end state. This observation has implications for the future of the enlargement process. We argue that the outcome of the previous rounds of enlargement was reactive and context-driven. Absent those same contextual factors, and although the EU reacts to the Russia-Ukraine war in a familiar sequence of incomplete decision-making, the outcome of this wartime enlargement negotiation process points in a different direction.","PeriodicalId":47516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Integration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2190106","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT The European Union (EU) revived the enlargement process in response to the Russia-Ukraine war. That reaction compares to how the EU utilized this process following the wars in the Balkans in the 1990s. In this paper, we argue that on neither occasion was the inclusion of more states within EU borders a preferred EU working agenda. Instead, the EU used enlargement as a stabilization and security-building mechanism without guaranteeing membership as the end state. This observation has implications for the future of the enlargement process. We argue that the outcome of the previous rounds of enlargement was reactive and context-driven. Absent those same contextual factors, and although the EU reacts to the Russia-Ukraine war in a familiar sequence of incomplete decision-making, the outcome of this wartime enlargement negotiation process points in a different direction.
战时欧盟:俄乌战争对欧盟扩大进程的影响
为应对俄乌战争,欧盟重启了扩大进程。这种反应与欧盟在上世纪90年代巴尔干半岛战争后利用这一进程的方式形成了对比。在本文中,我们认为在这两种情况下,在欧盟边界内纳入更多国家都不是欧盟优先考虑的工作议程。相反,欧盟将东扩作为一种稳定和安全建设机制,而不保证最终成员国身份。这一观察结果对今后的扩大进程有影响。我们认为,前几轮扩大的结果是被动的和受情况驱动的。如果没有这些相同的背景因素,尽管欧盟对俄乌战争的反应是一个熟悉的不完整决策序列,但这次战时扩大谈判进程的结果却指向了一个不同的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信