Factors of Critical Spatial Thinking for a Geography Metacognition Assessment in Indonesian Senior High Schools

Q3 Social Sciences
M. Nursa'ban, K. Kumaidi, M. Mukminan
{"title":"Factors of Critical Spatial Thinking for a Geography Metacognition Assessment in Indonesian Senior High Schools","authors":"M. Nursa'ban, K. Kumaidi, M. Mukminan","doi":"10.33403/rigeo.686050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Factors of Criticial Spatial Thinking for a Geography metacognition assessment are a moot point among experts and practitioners. This study aims to develop an understanding about such factors by using a structural equation model to generate a comprehensive and accurate assessment instrument for metacognition in Geography. The study is a research and development project for a Thesis. The current research involves 595 participants, consisting of experts and practitioners from eight representative Senior High Schools in Indonesia. The study occurred between August 2017 and February 2019. The results from a confirmatory factor analysis generated 15 indicators for three dimensions of Critical Spatial Thinking. The three dimensions are concept comprehension, concept application, and creativity in producing ideas; and they are used to generate an assessment for metacognition in Geography. The indicators involve concept application, location, distance, approach, equation, disaster mitigation, concept map, interaction, map instrument, aura, region, hierarchy, pattern, spatial association, and inquiry. The factors were assessed by nine experts and obtained 0.85 on the Aiken validity index. A chi-square of 330.47, df = 90, p-value = 0.000, and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.071, t = 4.78, and GFI = 1.96 in the significance level of 5%, proves the items fulfil both the analysis and construct dimensions, and also have a significant influence on the dimensions and factors of metacognition.","PeriodicalId":52147,"journal":{"name":"Review of International Geographical Education Online","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of International Geographical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.686050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Factors of Criticial Spatial Thinking for a Geography metacognition assessment are a moot point among experts and practitioners. This study aims to develop an understanding about such factors by using a structural equation model to generate a comprehensive and accurate assessment instrument for metacognition in Geography. The study is a research and development project for a Thesis. The current research involves 595 participants, consisting of experts and practitioners from eight representative Senior High Schools in Indonesia. The study occurred between August 2017 and February 2019. The results from a confirmatory factor analysis generated 15 indicators for three dimensions of Critical Spatial Thinking. The three dimensions are concept comprehension, concept application, and creativity in producing ideas; and they are used to generate an assessment for metacognition in Geography. The indicators involve concept application, location, distance, approach, equation, disaster mitigation, concept map, interaction, map instrument, aura, region, hierarchy, pattern, spatial association, and inquiry. The factors were assessed by nine experts and obtained 0.85 on the Aiken validity index. A chi-square of 330.47, df = 90, p-value = 0.000, and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.071, t = 4.78, and GFI = 1.96 in the significance level of 5%, proves the items fulfil both the analysis and construct dimensions, and also have a significant influence on the dimensions and factors of metacognition.
印尼高中地理元认知评价中批判性空间思维的影响因素
地理元认知评估中的批判性空间思维因素一直是专家和实践者们争论的焦点。本研究旨在通过使用结构方程模型来生成一个全面准确的地理元认知评估工具,从而加深对这些因素的理解。本研究是一篇论文的研究和开发项目。目前的研究涉及595名参与者,其中包括来自印度尼西亚八所具有代表性的高中的专家和从业者。该研究发生在2017年8月至2019年2月之间。验证性因素分析的结果为批判性空间思维的三个维度生成了15个指标。三个维度分别是概念理解、概念运用和创意产生;它们被用来生成地理中元认知的评估。指标包括概念应用、位置、距离、方法、等式、减灾、概念图、互动、地图工具、光环、区域、层次、模式、空间关联和探究。九位专家对这些因素进行了评估,Aiken有效性指数为0.85。卡方330.47,df=90,p值=0.000,近似均方根误差=0.071,t=4.78,GFI=1.96,在5%的显著性水平上,证明这些项目既满足了分析维度,也满足了结构维度,并且对元认知的维度和因素也有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: RIGEO aims to bridge the gap between theory and practice in geography education and social studies education. It is open for rigorous research papers as well as all level teachers’ experience about good practice for geography lessons and discussion papers. RIGEO would like to lie both in theory or on research papers and practice of geography teachers’ in geography education and in addition to social studies education. RIGEO is eager to publish original papers in all aspects of geography education and social studies education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信