Acute effect of three different warm-up protocols on maximal isokinetic strength in young men

Q4 Medicine
Patrick Rodrigues, S. Hernandez, Fabiano de Macedo Salgueirosa, Ednaldo Oliveira, L. Wharton, Raul Osiecki
{"title":"Acute effect of three different warm-up protocols on maximal isokinetic strength in young men","authors":"Patrick Rodrigues, S. Hernandez, Fabiano de Macedo Salgueirosa, Ednaldo Oliveira, L. Wharton, Raul Osiecki","doi":"10.33155/J.RAMD.2018.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the acute effect of three different warm-up protocols on a maximal isokinetic strength test. \nMethods: Twenty-two male, recreational athletes involved in regular resistance training were evaluated. Subjects performed a maximal isokinetic strength test of the knee extensors in an isokinetic dynamometer after completing a control session or one of the following warm-up protocols using a randomized design: a general warm-up, stretching warm-up, or specific warm-up. The comparison between treatments was completed through Repeated-Measures Analysis of Variance, followed by a Bonferroni “post hoc” test (p < 0.05). \nResults: The only difference found was the concentric peak moment following the application of the specific warm-up protocol, which was lower than the control session (12.94%; p < 0.05). No other differences were noted in eccentric peak movement or total work (concentric + eccentric) parameter after application of any the warm-up protocols within control condition (p > 0.05). \nConclusion: The finding of this investigation showed that none of warm-up protocols applied were able to change the total work of maximal isokinetic strength. Thus, our investigation suggests that the general warm-up, stretching warm-up and specific warm-up have had no adverse or improved effectiveness on acute muscle strength capacity.","PeriodicalId":39297,"journal":{"name":"Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33155/J.RAMD.2018.02.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the acute effect of three different warm-up protocols on a maximal isokinetic strength test. Methods: Twenty-two male, recreational athletes involved in regular resistance training were evaluated. Subjects performed a maximal isokinetic strength test of the knee extensors in an isokinetic dynamometer after completing a control session or one of the following warm-up protocols using a randomized design: a general warm-up, stretching warm-up, or specific warm-up. The comparison between treatments was completed through Repeated-Measures Analysis of Variance, followed by a Bonferroni “post hoc” test (p < 0.05). Results: The only difference found was the concentric peak moment following the application of the specific warm-up protocol, which was lower than the control session (12.94%; p < 0.05). No other differences were noted in eccentric peak movement or total work (concentric + eccentric) parameter after application of any the warm-up protocols within control condition (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The finding of this investigation showed that none of warm-up protocols applied were able to change the total work of maximal isokinetic strength. Thus, our investigation suggests that the general warm-up, stretching warm-up and specific warm-up have had no adverse or improved effectiveness on acute muscle strength capacity.
三种不同热身方案对青年男子最大等速力量的急性影响
目的:研究三种不同的热身方案对最大等速力量测试的急性影响。方法:对22名参加常规阻力训练的男性休闲运动员进行评价。受试者在完成对照会话或以下热身方案之一后,使用随机设计在等速测功机中对膝伸肌进行最大等速力量测试:一般热身、拉伸热身或特定热身。通过重复测量方差分析,然后进行Bonferroni“事后”测试,完成了两种治疗之间的比较(p<0.05)。结果:唯一发现的差异是应用特定热身方案后的同心峰值矩,低于对照组(12.94%;p<0.05)。在对照条件下应用任何热身方案后,偏心峰运动或总功(同心+偏心)参数均无其他差异(p>0.05)等速强度。因此,我们的研究表明,一般热身、拉伸热身和专项热身对急性肌肉力量能力没有不利或改善的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte
Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: El Centro Andaluz de Medicina del Deporte edita la Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte (RAMD) desde 2008 con periodicidad trimestral. Esta revista científica publica artículos originales de investigación, previamente sujetos a un proceso de selección y evaluación por pares, y constituye un foro para los científicos, especialistas y profesionales cuyas actividades están relacionadas con la actividad física, el deporte y la salud. Debido a la naturaleza multidisciplinaria de esta área, la revista cubre diferentes disciplinas relacionadas todas con la Medicina del Deporte, lo que la convierte en una publicación con un altísimo grado de interés para todos los profesionales relacionados con las Ciencias del Deporte.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信