The differences in the trophic structure of semi-enclosed and open coastal communities under the influence of an alien top predator (red king crab in the Barents Sea)
Anna K. Zalota, Vassily A. Spiridonov, Tatyana I. Antokhina, Yury V. Deart
{"title":"The differences in the trophic structure of semi-enclosed and open coastal communities under the influence of an alien top predator (red king crab in the Barents Sea)","authors":"Anna K. Zalota, Vassily A. Spiridonov, Tatyana I. Antokhina, Yury V. Deart","doi":"10.1111/maec.12708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The impact of the introduced red king crab (RKC), <i>Paralithodes camtschaticus</i>, in the Barents Sea was mostly studied through its direct predation on native species. This study uses stable isotope analysis of carbon and nitrogen to characterize major trophic groups (including grazing sea urchins) and specifically looks at RKC's trophic position and niche partitioning with the native hermit and spider crab species. To achieve this, we sampled organisms from the food web of a small fjord-like Zelenaya Inlet on the Murmansk coast in the southwestern Barents Sea and the open sea coast, just outside the inlet for comparison. There, macrophyte-derived carbon is the major source of organic matter along with the phytoplankton. In general, the fucoid source of primary production was more prominent within the inlet food web compared to the nearby open coastal zone. Isotopic trophic niches calculated using SIBER analysis showed partition between the native hermit and spider crabs suggesting, some degree of trophic segregation between coevolved species. RKCs are clustered together in the center of native decapod species' niches. There were some distinct differences between the feeding habits of RKCs within the inlet and the open sea coastal waters. The subadult RKCs that are present in the inlet throughout the year have a narrower (in the area and specifically in δ<sup>15</sup>N dimension) niche than the adults from the open sea. The latter have a wider variety of food items due to their migration and may prey on food items from different trophic levels. Sea urchins are an important trophic link transferring the macrophyte carbon to RKC. However, <i>P</i>. <i>camtschaticus</i> may also directly consume plant residues. Despite generally similar calculated trophic levels of decapod species, our isotopic data and literature data on the food composition of <i>Paralithodes camtschaticus</i> in the Barents Sea do not indicate significant RKC's competition with, and predation on, native species of crabs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49883,"journal":{"name":"Marine Ecology-An Evolutionary Perspective","volume":"43 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Ecology-An Evolutionary Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maec.12708","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The impact of the introduced red king crab (RKC), Paralithodes camtschaticus, in the Barents Sea was mostly studied through its direct predation on native species. This study uses stable isotope analysis of carbon and nitrogen to characterize major trophic groups (including grazing sea urchins) and specifically looks at RKC's trophic position and niche partitioning with the native hermit and spider crab species. To achieve this, we sampled organisms from the food web of a small fjord-like Zelenaya Inlet on the Murmansk coast in the southwestern Barents Sea and the open sea coast, just outside the inlet for comparison. There, macrophyte-derived carbon is the major source of organic matter along with the phytoplankton. In general, the fucoid source of primary production was more prominent within the inlet food web compared to the nearby open coastal zone. Isotopic trophic niches calculated using SIBER analysis showed partition between the native hermit and spider crabs suggesting, some degree of trophic segregation between coevolved species. RKCs are clustered together in the center of native decapod species' niches. There were some distinct differences between the feeding habits of RKCs within the inlet and the open sea coastal waters. The subadult RKCs that are present in the inlet throughout the year have a narrower (in the area and specifically in δ15N dimension) niche than the adults from the open sea. The latter have a wider variety of food items due to their migration and may prey on food items from different trophic levels. Sea urchins are an important trophic link transferring the macrophyte carbon to RKC. However, P. camtschaticus may also directly consume plant residues. Despite generally similar calculated trophic levels of decapod species, our isotopic data and literature data on the food composition of Paralithodes camtschaticus in the Barents Sea do not indicate significant RKC's competition with, and predation on, native species of crabs.
期刊介绍:
Marine Ecology publishes original contributions on the structure and dynamics of marine benthic and pelagic ecosystems, communities and populations, and on the critical links between ecology and the evolution of marine organisms.
The journal prioritizes contributions elucidating fundamental aspects of species interaction and adaptation to the environment through integration of information from various organizational levels (molecules to ecosystems) and different disciplines (molecular biology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, marine biology, natural history, geography, oceanography, palaeontology and modelling) as viewed from an ecological perspective. The journal also focuses on population genetic processes, evolution of life histories, morphological traits and behaviour, historical ecology and biogeography, macro-ecology and seascape ecology, palaeo-ecological reconstruction, and ecological changes due to introduction of new biota, human pressure or environmental change.
Most applied marine science, including fisheries biology, aquaculture, natural-products chemistry, toxicology, and local pollution studies lie outside the scope of the journal. Papers should address ecological questions that would be of interest to a worldwide readership of ecologists; papers of mostly local interest, including descriptions of flora and fauna, taxonomic descriptions, and range extensions will not be considered.