James Baldwin, Lionel Trilling, American Studies, and the Freudian Tragic

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Jay Garcia
{"title":"James Baldwin, Lionel Trilling, American Studies, and the Freudian Tragic","authors":"Jay Garcia","doi":"10.7227/JBR.3.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The intellectual connection between James Baldwin and Lionel Trilling, and the resonances across their criticism, are more substantial than scholarly and biographical treatments have disclosed. For Trilling, Baldwin’s writings were notable for their deviation from most humanistic inquiry, which he considered insufficiently alert to the harms and depredations of culture. Baldwin’s work became for Trilling a promising indication that American criticism could be remade along the lines of a tragic conception of culture deriving from Freud. This essay concentrates on a relevant but neglected dynamic in American letters—the mid-twentieth-century tension between Freudian thought and American humanistic inquiry evident in fields like American Studies—to explain the intellectual coordinates within which Trilling developed an affinity for Baldwin’s work. The essay concludes by suggesting that the twilight of Freud’s tragic conception of culture, which figured centrally in the modernist critical environment in which Baldwin and Trilling encountered one another, contributed to an estrangement whereby the two came to be seen as unrelated and different kinds of critics, despite the consonance of their critical idioms during the 1940s and 1950s.","PeriodicalId":36467,"journal":{"name":"James Baldwin Review","volume":"3 1","pages":"65-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"James Baldwin Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/JBR.3.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The intellectual connection between James Baldwin and Lionel Trilling, and the resonances across their criticism, are more substantial than scholarly and biographical treatments have disclosed. For Trilling, Baldwin’s writings were notable for their deviation from most humanistic inquiry, which he considered insufficiently alert to the harms and depredations of culture. Baldwin’s work became for Trilling a promising indication that American criticism could be remade along the lines of a tragic conception of culture deriving from Freud. This essay concentrates on a relevant but neglected dynamic in American letters—the mid-twentieth-century tension between Freudian thought and American humanistic inquiry evident in fields like American Studies—to explain the intellectual coordinates within which Trilling developed an affinity for Baldwin’s work. The essay concludes by suggesting that the twilight of Freud’s tragic conception of culture, which figured centrally in the modernist critical environment in which Baldwin and Trilling encountered one another, contributed to an estrangement whereby the two came to be seen as unrelated and different kinds of critics, despite the consonance of their critical idioms during the 1940s and 1950s.
詹姆斯·鲍德温、莱昂内尔·特里林、美国研究与弗洛伊德悲剧
詹姆斯·鲍德温(James Baldwin)和莱昂内尔·特里林(Lionel Trilling。对特里林来说,鲍德温的作品因偏离了大多数人文主义探究而引人注目,他认为人文主义探究对文化的危害和掠夺不够警觉。鲍德温的作品对特里林来说是一个很有希望的迹象,表明美国的批评可以按照源自弗洛伊德的悲剧文化观进行重塑。本文聚焦于美国信件中一个相关但被忽视的动态——二十世纪中期弗洛伊德思想与美国人文主义探究之间的紧张关系,这在美国研究等领域很明显——以解释特里林对鲍德温作品产生亲和力的智识坐标。文章最后指出,弗洛伊德的悲剧文化观在鲍德温和特里林相遇的现代主义批评环境中处于核心地位,其衰落导致了两人被视为不相关的不同类型的批评者的隔阂,尽管它们在20世纪40年代和50年代的批评习语是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
James Baldwin Review
James Baldwin Review Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信