Craft, Labour and Cabinets of Curiosities: Rethinking the Body of the Artisan

IF 0.5 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
U. Rublack
{"title":"Craft, Labour and Cabinets of Curiosities: Rethinking the Body of the Artisan","authors":"U. Rublack","doi":"10.1093/gerhis/ghad029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article asks how we should best historically situate processes of making and knowing in early modern luxury crafts. It focuses on the Augsburg merchant Philipp Hainhofer (1578–1647) and his celebrated cabinets of curiosities. The article methodologically argues for the need to cross-fertilize scholarship on ‘the body of the artisan’ (Pamela H. Smith) with the history of labour. The notion of the European ‘artisan’ involved in ‘making and knowing’ has unwittingly tended to conjure up the image of an unquestionably male and often autonomous practitioner soberly immersed in experiment. By contrast, the article argues that lived ‘bodies’ involved in making and knowing were diverse and subjected to far more disciplining and strain than has hitherto been highlighted. A culture of secrecy fostered isolation. Increased alcohol consumption interrelated with the cultivation of wit as intellectual and affective practice. The article considers how differences in social status and religious beliefs created tensions among these makers and pays attention to the gendered nature of these types of employment and the hidden global types of knowledge and labour upon which they depended. By focusing primarily on Hainhofer’s published and unpublished correspondence, the article argues against the generalized conception that artefacts emerged from a ‘flow’ between makers and materials and demonstrates how early modern craft labour can be situated in social, economic and cultural contexts. Material communities in the luxury crafts were characterized by systemic strain, conflicts and the need to find shortcuts, but also by pleasure, wit, resistance, tenacity and opportunities for conceptual thinking.","PeriodicalId":44471,"journal":{"name":"German History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerhis/ghad029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article asks how we should best historically situate processes of making and knowing in early modern luxury crafts. It focuses on the Augsburg merchant Philipp Hainhofer (1578–1647) and his celebrated cabinets of curiosities. The article methodologically argues for the need to cross-fertilize scholarship on ‘the body of the artisan’ (Pamela H. Smith) with the history of labour. The notion of the European ‘artisan’ involved in ‘making and knowing’ has unwittingly tended to conjure up the image of an unquestionably male and often autonomous practitioner soberly immersed in experiment. By contrast, the article argues that lived ‘bodies’ involved in making and knowing were diverse and subjected to far more disciplining and strain than has hitherto been highlighted. A culture of secrecy fostered isolation. Increased alcohol consumption interrelated with the cultivation of wit as intellectual and affective practice. The article considers how differences in social status and religious beliefs created tensions among these makers and pays attention to the gendered nature of these types of employment and the hidden global types of knowledge and labour upon which they depended. By focusing primarily on Hainhofer’s published and unpublished correspondence, the article argues against the generalized conception that artefacts emerged from a ‘flow’ between makers and materials and demonstrates how early modern craft labour can be situated in social, economic and cultural contexts. Material communities in the luxury crafts were characterized by systemic strain, conflicts and the need to find shortcuts, but also by pleasure, wit, resistance, tenacity and opportunities for conceptual thinking.
工艺、劳动和好奇的橱柜:对艺术家身体的再思考
这篇文章问我们应该如何最好地历史地定位在早期现代奢侈品工艺的制造和认识过程。它主要讲述了奥格斯堡商人菲利普·海因霍夫(Philipp Hainhofer, 1578-1647)和他著名的珍品橱柜。这篇文章在方法论上认为,需要将“工匠的身体”(帕梅拉·h·史密斯)的学术研究与劳动历史相结合。欧洲“工匠”参与“制造和知识”的概念,在不知不觉中倾向于让人联想到一个毫无疑问的男性形象,往往是一个自主的实践者,冷静地沉浸在实验中。相比之下,这篇文章认为,参与制造和认知的活生生的“身体”是多种多样的,受到的约束和压力远远超过迄今为止所强调的。保密文化助长了孤立。酒精消耗量的增加与智力和情感的培养有关。本文考虑了社会地位和宗教信仰的差异如何在这些制造者之间造成紧张关系,并关注了这些类型的就业的性别性质以及他们所依赖的隐藏的全球类型的知识和劳动。通过主要关注Hainhofer发表和未发表的通信,文章反对人工制品从制造者和材料之间的“流动”中出现的广义概念,并展示了早期现代手工劳动如何处于社会,经济和文化背景中。奢侈品工艺中的物质社区的特点是系统的紧张、冲突和寻找捷径的需要,但也有快乐、机智、抵抗、坚韧和概念思考的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
German History
German History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: German History is the journal of the German History Society and was first published in 1984. The journal offers refereed research articles, dissertation abstracts, news of interest to German historians, conference reports and a substantial book review section in four issues a year. German History’s broad ranging subject areas and high level of standards make it the top journal in its field and an essential addition to any German historian"s library.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信