Do Not Forbid Nietzsche to Minors: On Deleuze's Symptomatological Thought

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Paolo Vignola
{"title":"Do Not Forbid Nietzsche to Minors: On Deleuze's Symptomatological Thought","authors":"Paolo Vignola","doi":"10.3366/dlgs.2019.0380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper aims to describe the stakes of a Nietzschean influence on Deleuze's reflections on the transcendental and conversely to highlight the Deleuzian operation of politicising Nietzsche by ‘minorising’ him. In order to further understand such a complex relationship of becoming between Deleuze and Nietzsche, the first objective of the paper is to focus on active and reactive forces, which seem to be the core of this very relation. Thus, the paper suggests that micropolitics has its conditions of possibility in the Nietzschean corpus and, in particular, in the symptomatology of decadence, resentment and nihilism. In this sense, now the title of the paper reveals its meaning: the whole Deleuzian operation could be summarised as the passage from the criticism and questioning of an image of Nietzsche ‘forbidden to minors’ (especially for its presumed political dangerousness and alleged discrediting of minorities), typical of the interpretations of the first half of the twentieth century, to a becoming-minor of these very same Nietzschean concepts. It is precisely through such a becoming-minor that Nietzsche's diagnosis and concepts are translated in a political and emancipatory key, in order to give power to minorities.","PeriodicalId":40907,"journal":{"name":"Deleuze and Guattari Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3366/dlgs.2019.0380","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deleuze and Guattari Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/dlgs.2019.0380","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper aims to describe the stakes of a Nietzschean influence on Deleuze's reflections on the transcendental and conversely to highlight the Deleuzian operation of politicising Nietzsche by ‘minorising’ him. In order to further understand such a complex relationship of becoming between Deleuze and Nietzsche, the first objective of the paper is to focus on active and reactive forces, which seem to be the core of this very relation. Thus, the paper suggests that micropolitics has its conditions of possibility in the Nietzschean corpus and, in particular, in the symptomatology of decadence, resentment and nihilism. In this sense, now the title of the paper reveals its meaning: the whole Deleuzian operation could be summarised as the passage from the criticism and questioning of an image of Nietzsche ‘forbidden to minors’ (especially for its presumed political dangerousness and alleged discrediting of minorities), typical of the interpretations of the first half of the twentieth century, to a becoming-minor of these very same Nietzschean concepts. It is precisely through such a becoming-minor that Nietzsche's diagnosis and concepts are translated in a political and emancipatory key, in order to give power to minorities.
不禁止尼采对未成年人:德勒兹的症状学思想
本文旨在描述尼采对德勒兹对先验反思的影响,并反过来强调德勒兹通过“淡化”尼采而将尼采政治化的操作。为了进一步理解德勒兹和尼采之间如此复杂的形成关系,本文的第一个目标是关注积极和被动的力量,这似乎是这种关系的核心。因此,本文认为微观政治在尼采的语料中,特别是在颓废、怨恨和虚无主义的症状学中,有其可能性的条件。在这个意义上,现在论文的标题揭示了它的意义:整个德勒兹式的操作可以概括为对尼采“禁止未成年人”形象的批评和质疑(特别是对其假定的政治危险和所谓的对少数人的诋毁),这是20世纪上半叶的典型解释,成为这些非常相同的尼采概念的未成年人。正是通过这种“成为次要”,尼采的诊断和概念被翻译成政治和解放的关键,以赋予少数人权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信