Documenting an Open Future in a Post-Policy World

Serials Librarian Pub Date : 2022-03-10 DOI:10.1080/0361526X.2022.2017673

C. Harrington, R. Scott

引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This session continues the work of a 2019 survey that investigated library policies related to Open Access (OA). Specifically, this study sought to address the self-selection of participants by randomly selecting and directly contacting academic librarians at libraries within one of four different Carnegie classifications to request input on their library’s collection development policies and the existence of OA policies or informal practices related to library collections. The findings surface disparities in the documentation of OA collection practices among institution classifications and highlight concerns about both OA and policies in the collections strategies of academic libraries.

查看原文本刊更多论文

记录后政策时代开放的未来

本次会议延续了2019年的一项调查工作，该调查调查了与开放获取(OA)相关的图书馆政策。具体而言，本研究试图通过随机选择并直接联系卡内基四种不同分类之一的图书馆的学术图书馆员，来解决参与者的自我选择问题，要求他们就其图书馆的馆藏发展政策和OA政策的存在或与图书馆馆藏相关的非正式实践提供意见。研究结果揭示了机构分类中OA馆藏实践文献的差异，并强调了对学术图书馆馆藏策略中OA和政策的关注。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Serials Librarian Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Serials Librarian is an international journal covering all aspects of the management of serials and other continuing resources in any format—print, electronic, etc.—ranging from their publication, to their abstracting and indexing by commercial services, and their collection and processing by libraries. The journal provides a forum for discussion and innovation for all those involved in the serials information chain, but especially for librarians and other library staff, be they in a single (continuing resources) department or in collection development, acquisitions, cataloging/metadata, or information technology departments.