Beyond sharing knowledge: knowledge brokers’ strategies to build capacity in education systems

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Anita Caduff, Marie Lockton, A. Daly, M. Rehm
{"title":"Beyond sharing knowledge: knowledge brokers’ strategies to build capacity in education systems","authors":"Anita Caduff, Marie Lockton, A. Daly, M. Rehm","doi":"10.1108/jpcc-10-2022-0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe study analyzes how equity-focused knowledge brokers, working at different levels of the US education system, understand and discuss capacity building in education systems, such as schools, districts, state and local education agencies, to answer this research question: How do equity-focused knowledge brokers support capacity building in education systems?Design/methodology/approachSemi-structured interviews were conducted with five well-known equity-focused organizations that broker evidence-based knowledge and resources to educational systems, practitioners and policymakers. The research team members qualitatively analyzed 18 h of recordings, using their co-developed codebook based on the research questions and prior research on knowledge mobilization.FindingsFour strategies to build capacity within the educational systems were identified. Pursuing sustainable educational change, brokering organizations built capacity with context-specific strategies: (1) engaging various roles within educational systems, (2) fostering communities and partnerships, (3) supporting educators and policymakers’ agency and efficacy and (4) creating a wider culture of external support beyond the systems themselves.Originality/valueThis study shows how knowledge brokers employed context-specific strategies targeting whole systems instead of individuals to ensure that the organization and individuals within had the mindsets, capability, and conditions to engage with and adapt the brokered knowledge and resources. Findings build on existing literature showing how knowledge brokers build capacity through well-known approaches, such as workshops/training, online tutorials and other online resources.","PeriodicalId":44790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-10-2022-0058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe study analyzes how equity-focused knowledge brokers, working at different levels of the US education system, understand and discuss capacity building in education systems, such as schools, districts, state and local education agencies, to answer this research question: How do equity-focused knowledge brokers support capacity building in education systems?Design/methodology/approachSemi-structured interviews were conducted with five well-known equity-focused organizations that broker evidence-based knowledge and resources to educational systems, practitioners and policymakers. The research team members qualitatively analyzed 18 h of recordings, using their co-developed codebook based on the research questions and prior research on knowledge mobilization.FindingsFour strategies to build capacity within the educational systems were identified. Pursuing sustainable educational change, brokering organizations built capacity with context-specific strategies: (1) engaging various roles within educational systems, (2) fostering communities and partnerships, (3) supporting educators and policymakers’ agency and efficacy and (4) creating a wider culture of external support beyond the systems themselves.Originality/valueThis study shows how knowledge brokers employed context-specific strategies targeting whole systems instead of individuals to ensure that the organization and individuals within had the mindsets, capability, and conditions to engage with and adapt the brokered knowledge and resources. Findings build on existing literature showing how knowledge brokers build capacity through well-known approaches, such as workshops/training, online tutorials and other online resources.
分享知识之外:知识经纪人的教育系统能力建设战略
目的本研究分析了在美国教育系统不同层面工作的以股权为重点的知识经纪人如何理解和讨论教育系统的能力建设,如学校、地区、州和地方教育机构,以回答这个研究问题:以股权为重点的知识经纪人是如何支持教育系统能力建设的?设计/方法/方法对五个知名的以股权为重点的组织进行了半结构化访谈,这些组织为教育系统、从业者和政策制定者提供循证知识和资源。研究小组成员根据研究问题和先前对知识动员的研究,使用他们共同开发的代码簿,对18小时的录音进行了定性分析。发现在教育系统内确定了四项能力建设战略。追求可持续的教育变革,为组织建设能力提供针对具体情况的战略:(1)在教育系统内发挥各种作用,(2)促进社区和伙伴关系,(3)支持教育工作者和政策制定者的能动性和有效性,(4)在系统本身之外创造更广泛的外部支持文化。独创性/价值这项研究表明,知识中介是如何针对整个系统而非个人采用特定情境的策略,以确保组织和内部的个人具有参与和调整中介知识和资源的心态、能力和条件。研究结果建立在现有文献的基础上,这些文献显示了知识经纪人如何通过研讨会/培训、在线教程和其他在线资源等知名方法建立能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Professional Capital and Community
Journal of Professional Capital and Community EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信