Quality of Life and Population Health in Behavioral Health Care: A Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Study

Q4 Medicine
W. M. Drymalski
{"title":"Quality of Life and Population Health in Behavioral Health Care: A Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"W. M. Drymalski","doi":"10.12788/jcom.0114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine whether a single-item quality of life (QOL) measure could serve as a useful population health–level metric within the Quadruple Aim framework in a publicly funded behavioral health system. Design: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study that examined the correlation between the single-item QOL measure and several other key measures of the social determinants of health and a composite measure of acute service utilization for all patients receiving mental health and substance use services in a community behavioral health system. Methods: Data were collected for 4488 patients who had at least 1 assessment between October 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021. Data on social determinants of health were obtained through patient self-report; acute service use data were obtained from electronic health records. Results: Statistical analyses revealed results in the expected direction for all relationships tested. Patients with higher QOL were more likely to report “Good” or better self-rated physical health, be employed, have a private residence, and report recent positive social interactions, and were less likely to have received acute services in the previous 90 days. Conclusion: A single-item QOL measure shows promise as a general, minimally burdensome whole-system metric that can function as a target for population health management efforts in a large behavioral health system. Future research should explore whether this QOL measure is sensitive to change over time and examine its temporal relationship with other key outcome metrics.","PeriodicalId":15393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/jcom.0114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine whether a single-item quality of life (QOL) measure could serve as a useful population health–level metric within the Quadruple Aim framework in a publicly funded behavioral health system. Design: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study that examined the correlation between the single-item QOL measure and several other key measures of the social determinants of health and a composite measure of acute service utilization for all patients receiving mental health and substance use services in a community behavioral health system. Methods: Data were collected for 4488 patients who had at least 1 assessment between October 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021. Data on social determinants of health were obtained through patient self-report; acute service use data were obtained from electronic health records. Results: Statistical analyses revealed results in the expected direction for all relationships tested. Patients with higher QOL were more likely to report “Good” or better self-rated physical health, be employed, have a private residence, and report recent positive social interactions, and were less likely to have received acute services in the previous 90 days. Conclusion: A single-item QOL measure shows promise as a general, minimally burdensome whole-system metric that can function as a target for population health management efforts in a large behavioral health system. Future research should explore whether this QOL measure is sensitive to change over time and examine its temporal relationship with other key outcome metrics.
行为健康护理中的生活质量与人群健康:一项回顾性横断面研究
目的:本研究的目的是确定在公共资助的行为健康系统中,单项生活质量(QOL)指标是否可以作为四重目标框架内有用的人群健康水平指标。设计:这是一项回顾性的横断面研究,研究了单项生活质量指标与健康社会决定因素的其他几个关键指标之间的相关性,以及在社区行为健康系统中接受心理健康和药物使用服务的所有患者急性服务利用率的综合指标。方法:收集了4488名患者的数据,这些患者在2020年10月1日至2021年9月30日期间至少进行了一次评估。关于健康的社会决定因素的数据是通过患者自我报告获得的;急性服务使用数据来自电子健康记录。结果:统计分析显示,所有测试关系的结果都符合预期方向。生活质量较高的患者更有可能报告“良好”或自我评价更好的身体健康状况,有工作,有私人住所,最近有积极的社交互动,并且在过去90天内接受急性服务的可能性较小。结论:单项生活质量指标有望成为一种通用的、负担最小的全系统指标,可以作为大型行为健康系统中人群健康管理工作的目标。未来的研究应该探索这种生活质量指标是否对随时间的变化敏感,并检查其与其他关键结果指标的时间关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信