{"title":"Labile Carbon Affects Fecundity of Omodeoscolex divergens and Eudrilus eugeniae under Pure and Mixed Culture Vermicomposting","authors":"Micah Martin, G. Eudoxie, G. Gouveia","doi":"10.1080/1065657X.2020.1727788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Detergent fiber analysis was used to fractionate carbon (C) into hemicellulose (degradable carbon) and cellulose and lignin (recalcitrant carbon) for cattle manure (CM), neem leaves (NL), corn stover (CS), and lawn clipping (LC) to investigate the effects of C quality on vermicomposting. A factorial design having five C sources (CM, CM + NL, CS, CS + NL, and LC) and two earthworm species (Eudrilus eugeniae (EE) and Omodeoscolex divergens (OD)) was studied under pure and mixed culture vermicomposting. Earthworm fecundity, biomass, and vermicompost quality were measured. The combination of culture and C source was significant (p < 0.05) for all fecundity and biomass variables. CM and CM + NL were mainly associated with increased responses. Change in population was > tenfold for EE and OD reared on CM. Percentage change in biomass increased up to 200% for OD and EE when fed CM and CM + NL. Contrastingly, decreases or no changes in fecundity and biomass parameters were associated with CS and CS + NL. The NL combinations resulted in lower responses in fecundity and biomass; however, earthworms favored CM + NL over CS + NL. OD was highest (p < 0.05) amongst cultures for LC. The mixed culture response was generally low for parameters measured. Vermicompost C/N ratio decreased from initial carbon source values except for LC. O. divergens vermi-converted carbon sources of varying C quality, producing distinct vermicompost in the process.","PeriodicalId":10714,"journal":{"name":"Compost Science & Utilization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1065657X.2020.1727788","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compost Science & Utilization","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2020.1727788","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Detergent fiber analysis was used to fractionate carbon (C) into hemicellulose (degradable carbon) and cellulose and lignin (recalcitrant carbon) for cattle manure (CM), neem leaves (NL), corn stover (CS), and lawn clipping (LC) to investigate the effects of C quality on vermicomposting. A factorial design having five C sources (CM, CM + NL, CS, CS + NL, and LC) and two earthworm species (Eudrilus eugeniae (EE) and Omodeoscolex divergens (OD)) was studied under pure and mixed culture vermicomposting. Earthworm fecundity, biomass, and vermicompost quality were measured. The combination of culture and C source was significant (p < 0.05) for all fecundity and biomass variables. CM and CM + NL were mainly associated with increased responses. Change in population was > tenfold for EE and OD reared on CM. Percentage change in biomass increased up to 200% for OD and EE when fed CM and CM + NL. Contrastingly, decreases or no changes in fecundity and biomass parameters were associated with CS and CS + NL. The NL combinations resulted in lower responses in fecundity and biomass; however, earthworms favored CM + NL over CS + NL. OD was highest (p < 0.05) amongst cultures for LC. The mixed culture response was generally low for parameters measured. Vermicompost C/N ratio decreased from initial carbon source values except for LC. O. divergens vermi-converted carbon sources of varying C quality, producing distinct vermicompost in the process.
期刊介绍:
4 issues per year
Compost Science & Utilization is currently abstracted/indexed in: CABI Agriculture & Environment Abstracts, CSA Biotechnology and Environmental Engineering Abstracts, EBSCOhost Abstracts, Elsevier Compendex and GEOBASE Abstracts, PubMed, ProQuest Science Abstracts, and Thomson Reuters Biological Abstracts and Science Citation Index