Improving the Estimation of Soil Moisture in Semi-Arid Regions Using Data from Different Remote Sensing Techniques

Q4 Social Sciences
{"title":"Improving the Estimation of Soil Moisture in Semi-Arid Regions Using Data from Different Remote Sensing Techniques","authors":"","doi":"10.52939/ijg.v19i8.2781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Satellite-derived soil moisture fields received attention due to their large spatial coverage and spatial resolution that suits many applications. The sensors used vary from passive (e.g., LANDSAT-8) to active (e.g., SENTINEL-1) with varying accuracy problems. Passive sensing can only determine relative indices between pixels within a vegetation class and not the real value of moisture. Active sensing suffers from the sensitivity of its detecting behaviour to the level of moisture (anomalous backscatter). The above problems impose limitations on the application without frequent ground-based calibration. The paper investigates possible models to improve the estimation of soil moisture using the powers of the two sensors. In addition, a Hydrologic Surface Moisture indicator (HSM) is included as a third source of information. The paper tests modeling combinations of the three soil moisture predictors (Landsat-8, Sentinel-1, and HSM). The models are validated using in-situ measurements. The results showed that Landsat-8 data can be rescaled using HSM to provide the actual soil moisture in the soil. On the other side, it is possible to remove the anomaly from the Sentinel-1 backscatter using either Landsat-8 or HSM. The elimination of the above problems explained a significant portion of the differences between the two sensors.","PeriodicalId":38707,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geoinformatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geoinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52939/ijg.v19i8.2781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Satellite-derived soil moisture fields received attention due to their large spatial coverage and spatial resolution that suits many applications. The sensors used vary from passive (e.g., LANDSAT-8) to active (e.g., SENTINEL-1) with varying accuracy problems. Passive sensing can only determine relative indices between pixels within a vegetation class and not the real value of moisture. Active sensing suffers from the sensitivity of its detecting behaviour to the level of moisture (anomalous backscatter). The above problems impose limitations on the application without frequent ground-based calibration. The paper investigates possible models to improve the estimation of soil moisture using the powers of the two sensors. In addition, a Hydrologic Surface Moisture indicator (HSM) is included as a third source of information. The paper tests modeling combinations of the three soil moisture predictors (Landsat-8, Sentinel-1, and HSM). The models are validated using in-situ measurements. The results showed that Landsat-8 data can be rescaled using HSM to provide the actual soil moisture in the soil. On the other side, it is possible to remove the anomaly from the Sentinel-1 backscatter using either Landsat-8 or HSM. The elimination of the above problems explained a significant portion of the differences between the two sensors.
利用不同遥感技术的数据改进半干旱地区土壤水分的估算
卫星土壤湿度场因其空间覆盖范围大、空间分辨率高、适合多种应用而备受关注。所使用的传感器从被动(例如LANDSAT-8)到主动(例如SENTINEL-1)不等,精度问题各不相同。被动遥感只能确定一个植被类别内像素之间的相对指数,而不能确定水分的真实值。主动传感受到其探测行为对湿度水平(异常后向散射)的灵敏度的影响。上述问题限制了不经常进行地面校准的应用。本文探讨了利用这两个传感器的功率来改进土壤湿度估计的可能模型。此外,还包括一个水文表面湿度指标(HSM)作为第三个信息来源。本文测试了三种土壤湿度预测器(Landsat-8、Sentinel-1和HSM)的建模组合。通过现场测量对模型进行了验证。结果表明,Landsat-8数据可以利用HSM重新标度,以提供土壤中实际的土壤水分。另一方面,可以使用Landsat-8或HSM从Sentinel-1背向散射中去除异常。上述问题的消除解释了两种传感器之间差异的重要部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Geoinformatics
International Journal of Geoinformatics Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信