Situation analysis of the pharmacovigilance system in Nepal using the indicator-based pharmacovigilance assessment tool (IPAT)

IF 0.5 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
N. Jha, Subish Palaian, Prabakaran Shankar, S. K. C., Pan Bahadur Kshetry
{"title":"Situation analysis of the pharmacovigilance system in Nepal using the indicator-based pharmacovigilance assessment tool (IPAT)","authors":"N. Jha, Subish Palaian, Prabakaran Shankar, S. K. C., Pan Bahadur Kshetry","doi":"10.1093/jphsr/rmab054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The aim of this study was to assess the national and regional pharmacovigilance centres in Nepal in terms of their policy frameworks, structure and functioning.\n \n \n \n A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted during January 2021 among regional pharmacovigilance centres, and the national pharmacovigilance centre and the Ministry of Health and Population. The indicator-based pharmacovigilance assessment tool (IPAT) consisting of 43 indicators (26 core and 17 supplementary) assessing different aspects of pharmacovigilance was used.\n \n \n \n Of a total of 14 candidates representing regional pharmacovigilance centres, 12 agreed to participate. The national pharmacovigilance centre located at the Department of Drug Administration had an acceptable level of infrastructure and manpower but poor functioning and weak collaboration with regional centres. There are no policies and procedures specifically related to pharmacovigilance and no requirement for pharmaceutical companies to report adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The national centre received only 42 ADR reports during the evaluation period. The regional centres are mostly located (10 out of 14) in the Kathmandu Valley and had qualified manpower and basic resources. There were poor process indicators suggesting problems with functioning in terms of ADR reporting, signal generation and drug safety communication.\n \n \n \n Underreporting of ADRs, weak processes and poor coordination among centres limit functioning of the system. Creating more awareness, involving consumers and pharmaceutical companies in the reporting process, and conducting more training programmes are needed for the proper functioning of pharmacovigilance services in Nepal.\n","PeriodicalId":16705,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmab054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the national and regional pharmacovigilance centres in Nepal in terms of their policy frameworks, structure and functioning. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted during January 2021 among regional pharmacovigilance centres, and the national pharmacovigilance centre and the Ministry of Health and Population. The indicator-based pharmacovigilance assessment tool (IPAT) consisting of 43 indicators (26 core and 17 supplementary) assessing different aspects of pharmacovigilance was used. Of a total of 14 candidates representing regional pharmacovigilance centres, 12 agreed to participate. The national pharmacovigilance centre located at the Department of Drug Administration had an acceptable level of infrastructure and manpower but poor functioning and weak collaboration with regional centres. There are no policies and procedures specifically related to pharmacovigilance and no requirement for pharmaceutical companies to report adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The national centre received only 42 ADR reports during the evaluation period. The regional centres are mostly located (10 out of 14) in the Kathmandu Valley and had qualified manpower and basic resources. There were poor process indicators suggesting problems with functioning in terms of ADR reporting, signal generation and drug safety communication. Underreporting of ADRs, weak processes and poor coordination among centres limit functioning of the system. Creating more awareness, involving consumers and pharmaceutical companies in the reporting process, and conducting more training programmes are needed for the proper functioning of pharmacovigilance services in Nepal.
使用基于指标的药物警戒评估工具(IPAT)对尼泊尔药物警戒系统的情况分析
本研究的目的是评估尼泊尔国家和区域药物警戒中心的政策框架、结构和功能。2021年1月,在区域药物警戒中心、国家药物警戒中心以及卫生和人口部之间进行了一项描述性横断面研究。采用基于指标的药物警戒性评估工具(IPAT),由43个指标(26个核心指标和17个补充指标)组成,评估药物警戒性的不同方面。在代表区域药物警戒中心的14个候选国家中,12个国家同意参加。设在药品管理局的国家药物警戒中心的基础设施和人力水平尚可接受,但功能差,与各区域中心的合作薄弱。没有专门与药物警戒相关的政策和程序,也没有要求制药公司报告药物不良反应(adr)。国家中心在评估期间仅收到42份药品不良反应报告。这些区域中心大多位于加德满都谷地(14个中心中的10个),拥有合格的人力和基本资源。流程指标较差,表明在不良反应报告、信号产生和药品安全沟通方面存在运作问题。少报adr、流程薄弱和中心间协调不力限制了该系统的运作。尼泊尔需要提高认识,让消费者和制药公司参与报告过程,并开展更多的培训规划,才能使药物警戒服务正常运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信