Overcoming the liability of distance? An exploratory study of the associations between social networks, sense of community and spatial colocation

IF 2.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Felichism W. Kabo
{"title":"Overcoming the liability of distance? An exploratory study of the associations between social networks, sense of community and spatial colocation","authors":"Felichism W. Kabo","doi":"10.1108/jcre-10-2020-0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine the associations of social networks with the sense of community (SOC) construct and spatial colocation or having an office. The study site was an institute for health-care policy research formed in 2011 by bringing together scientists from more than 20 different university units. Only 30% of the scientists were had an office or physical presence at the institute. Therefore, the institute was an ideal site to examine whether SOC was correlated with different dimensions of network position – connectedness, reachability and brokerage – even when the authors account for the lack of spatial colocation for the off-site scientists.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA two-part (sociometric and workplace) internet survey instrument was administered in 2014 to the institute’s population of 411 individuals. The sociometric data were used to create an undirected interaction network and the following dependent variables (DVs) or network centralities: normalized degree to measure connectedness; average reciprocal distance to capture reachability; and normalized betweenness to proxy brokerage. Separate node-level network regressions were then run with random permutations (N = 10,000) and listwise deletion for each of the DVs with SOC and spatial colocation as the independent variables, and variables that controlled for gender, organizational affiliation and job category.\n\n\nFindings\nSOC and spatial colocation are both positively and significantly correlated with network connectedness and reachability. The results suggest that both SOC and spatial colocation have a larger impact on reachability than connectedness. However, neither SOC nor spatial colocation are significantly associated with network brokerage. Finally, the findings show that SOC and spatial colocation are more reliable predictors of network connectedness and reachability than are key individual- and unit-level control variables, specifically the individual’s sex, job category and organizational affiliation. The controls were not significantly associated with any of the three network centralities, namely, connectedness, reachability and brokerage.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis exploratory study used social network analysis and node-level network regressions to examine the associations from SOC and spatial colocation to dimensions of network position. SOC is positively and significantly associated with network connectedness and reachability, suggesting that SOC is an important consideration when individuals are disadvantaged from the absence of spatial colocation. The findings have implications for work in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic as they imply that interventions based on the SOC construct could potentially lessen the negative effects of remote work on workplace social networks due to factors such as the reduction of social contacts.\n","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-10-2020-0055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the associations of social networks with the sense of community (SOC) construct and spatial colocation or having an office. The study site was an institute for health-care policy research formed in 2011 by bringing together scientists from more than 20 different university units. Only 30% of the scientists were had an office or physical presence at the institute. Therefore, the institute was an ideal site to examine whether SOC was correlated with different dimensions of network position – connectedness, reachability and brokerage – even when the authors account for the lack of spatial colocation for the off-site scientists. Design/methodology/approach A two-part (sociometric and workplace) internet survey instrument was administered in 2014 to the institute’s population of 411 individuals. The sociometric data were used to create an undirected interaction network and the following dependent variables (DVs) or network centralities: normalized degree to measure connectedness; average reciprocal distance to capture reachability; and normalized betweenness to proxy brokerage. Separate node-level network regressions were then run with random permutations (N = 10,000) and listwise deletion for each of the DVs with SOC and spatial colocation as the independent variables, and variables that controlled for gender, organizational affiliation and job category. Findings SOC and spatial colocation are both positively and significantly correlated with network connectedness and reachability. The results suggest that both SOC and spatial colocation have a larger impact on reachability than connectedness. However, neither SOC nor spatial colocation are significantly associated with network brokerage. Finally, the findings show that SOC and spatial colocation are more reliable predictors of network connectedness and reachability than are key individual- and unit-level control variables, specifically the individual’s sex, job category and organizational affiliation. The controls were not significantly associated with any of the three network centralities, namely, connectedness, reachability and brokerage. Originality/value This exploratory study used social network analysis and node-level network regressions to examine the associations from SOC and spatial colocation to dimensions of network position. SOC is positively and significantly associated with network connectedness and reachability, suggesting that SOC is an important consideration when individuals are disadvantaged from the absence of spatial colocation. The findings have implications for work in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic as they imply that interventions based on the SOC construct could potentially lessen the negative effects of remote work on workplace social networks due to factors such as the reduction of social contacts.
克服距离的负担?社会网络、社区意识与空间区位关系的探索性研究
目的本研究旨在探讨社会网络与社区意识(SOC)建构、空间配置或拥有办公室的关系。该研究地点是一个医疗保健政策研究所,成立于2011年,汇集了来自20多个不同大学部门的科学家。只有30%的科学家在研究所有办公室或实体存在。因此,该研究所是检验SOC是否与网络位置的不同维度(连通性、可达性和中介性)相关的理想场所,即使作者考虑到非现场科学家缺乏空间托管。设计/方法/方法2014年,该研究所对411名个人进行了两部分(社会计量学和工作场所)的互联网调查。社会计量学数据被用来创建一个无向交互网络和以下因变量(DVs)或网络中心性:衡量连通性的归一化程度;捕获可达性的平均倒数距离;规范化的中介到代理经纪。然后,以SOC和空间托管为自变量,以及控制性别、组织隶属关系和工作类别的变量,对每个DVs进行随机排列(N = 10,000)和列表删除的单独节点级网络回归。发现ssoc和空间托管与网络连通性和可达性均呈显著正相关。结果表明,SOC和空间托管对可达性的影响大于连通性。然而,SOC和空间托管都与网络代理无关。最后,研究结果表明,SOC和空间配置是网络连通性和可达性的更可靠的预测因子,而不是关键的个人和单位控制变量,特别是个人的性别、工作类别和组织隶属关系。控制与三个网络中心性(即连通性、可达性和经纪)中的任何一个都没有显著关联。独创性/价值本研究采用社会网络分析和节点级网络回归方法,考察了SOC、空间托管与网络位置维度的关系。SOC与网络连通性和可达性呈正相关,这表明当个体因缺乏空间托管而处于不利地位时,SOC是一个重要的考虑因素。这些发现对COVID-19大流行背景下的工作有影响,因为它们意味着基于SOC构建的干预措施可能会减少远程工作对工作场所社交网络的负面影响,这是由于社交接触减少等因素造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信