Topic Avoidance as a Privacy Management Strategy: Outcomes and Predictors of Parent Well-being and Sibling Caregiving Topic Avoidance

IF 2.2 Q2 COMMUNICATION
H. Lillie, Maria K. Venetis
{"title":"Topic Avoidance as a Privacy Management Strategy: Outcomes and Predictors of Parent Well-being and Sibling Caregiving Topic Avoidance","authors":"H. Lillie, Maria K. Venetis","doi":"10.1080/15267431.2020.1823395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As the population ages, siblings more frequently assume the role of filial caregiver. Siblings often avoid communication about caregiving, and this topic avoidance can be detrimental to well-being. Framed in the communication privacy management theory (CPM), the current study tests the associations between privacy rule criteria and siblings’ caregiving topic avoidance and the impact of topic avoidance on relationship satisfaction and depression. A sample of 415 caregivers, including 242 primary caregivers and 173 secondary caregivers, completed an online survey regarding their caregiving communication with a sibling. Topic avoidance about both parent well-being and sibling caregiving were positively associated with privacy rule criteria of parent health, liking, and risk-benefit ratio and negatively associated with trust. Parent well-being topic avoidance was associated positively with primary caregivers’ depression and negatively with relationship satisfaction for both primary and secondary caregivers. Sibling caregiving topic avoidance was associated positively with depression and negatively with relationship satisfaction for both primary and secondary caregivers.","PeriodicalId":46648,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION","volume":"20 1","pages":"313 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15267431.2020.1823395","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2020.1823395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT As the population ages, siblings more frequently assume the role of filial caregiver. Siblings often avoid communication about caregiving, and this topic avoidance can be detrimental to well-being. Framed in the communication privacy management theory (CPM), the current study tests the associations between privacy rule criteria and siblings’ caregiving topic avoidance and the impact of topic avoidance on relationship satisfaction and depression. A sample of 415 caregivers, including 242 primary caregivers and 173 secondary caregivers, completed an online survey regarding their caregiving communication with a sibling. Topic avoidance about both parent well-being and sibling caregiving were positively associated with privacy rule criteria of parent health, liking, and risk-benefit ratio and negatively associated with trust. Parent well-being topic avoidance was associated positively with primary caregivers’ depression and negatively with relationship satisfaction for both primary and secondary caregivers. Sibling caregiving topic avoidance was associated positively with depression and negatively with relationship satisfaction for both primary and secondary caregivers.
话题回避作为隐私管理策略:父母幸福和兄弟姐妹照顾话题回避的结果和预测因素
摘要随着人口老龄化,兄弟姐妹更频繁地扮演孝顺的照顾者角色。兄弟姐妹经常避免就照顾问题进行交流,而这种话题的回避可能对健康不利。本研究以沟通隐私管理理论(CPM)为框架,测试了隐私规则标准与兄弟姐妹照顾话题回避之间的关系,以及话题回避对关系满意度和抑郁的影响。415名护理人员的样本,包括242名初级护理人员和173名次级护理人员,完成了一项关于他们与兄弟姐妹的护理沟通的在线调查。关于父母幸福感和兄弟姐妹照顾的话题回避与父母健康、喜好和风险收益比的隐私规则标准呈正相关,与信任负相关。父母幸福话题回避与主要照顾者的抑郁呈正相关,与主要和次要照顾者的关系满意度呈负相关。对于主要和次要照顾者来说,兄弟姐妹照顾话题回避与抑郁症呈正相关,与关系满意度呈负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信