Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Cross-sectional Study of Content Quality on TikTok

Raquel Wescott, Ramneek K Dhami, Lingchen Wang, W. Hovenic
{"title":"Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Cross-sectional Study of Content Quality on TikTok","authors":"Raquel Wescott, Ramneek K Dhami, Lingchen Wang, W. Hovenic","doi":"10.25251/skin.7.3.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: TikTok is a popular social media platform that is sometimes used to share medical information. 1 Creators share their experiences with or provide education regarding medical diagnoses. This study investigated the content quality of TikTok videos regarding hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).\nMethods: On October 24, 2022, we searched #hidradenitissuppurativa on TikTok and filtered by most liked videos. Two independent reviewers analyzed the videos, excluding those not in English, irrelevant to HS, and duplicates. Videos were scored using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), 2 a one question scale (1-poor quality to 5-excellent quality), and the DISCERN tool, 3 a 16-question analysis (1-low quality to 5-high quality).\nResults: One-hundred videos were included. The mean GQS score was 2.49 [SD 0.87] and mean DISCERN score was 1.98 [SD 0.52], with substantial interrater reliability (Cohen’s Kappa 0.667). Twenty-six videos (26%) were created by physicians and 74 (74%) were created by non-physicians. Mean GQS and DISCERN scores for physician versus non-physician videos were 3.40 and 2.62, and 2.16 and 1.75, respectively. Both GQS and DISCERN scores were greater for videos created by physicians versus non-physicians (p < 0.0001).\nConclusion: Overall, there is a lack of information on treatment benefits, risks, and mechanism of action. Given the mean GQS and DISCERN scores, the average video was of generally poor quality, creating potential for lack of knowledge and misinformation regarding HS. With the growing use of TikTok for educational purposes, improving content quality should be a priority to provide accurate information regarding medical conditions such as HS.","PeriodicalId":74803,"journal":{"name":"Skin (Milwood, N.Y.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin (Milwood, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.7.3.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: TikTok is a popular social media platform that is sometimes used to share medical information. 1 Creators share their experiences with or provide education regarding medical diagnoses. This study investigated the content quality of TikTok videos regarding hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Methods: On October 24, 2022, we searched #hidradenitissuppurativa on TikTok and filtered by most liked videos. Two independent reviewers analyzed the videos, excluding those not in English, irrelevant to HS, and duplicates. Videos were scored using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), 2 a one question scale (1-poor quality to 5-excellent quality), and the DISCERN tool, 3 a 16-question analysis (1-low quality to 5-high quality). Results: One-hundred videos were included. The mean GQS score was 2.49 [SD 0.87] and mean DISCERN score was 1.98 [SD 0.52], with substantial interrater reliability (Cohen’s Kappa 0.667). Twenty-six videos (26%) were created by physicians and 74 (74%) were created by non-physicians. Mean GQS and DISCERN scores for physician versus non-physician videos were 3.40 and 2.62, and 2.16 and 1.75, respectively. Both GQS and DISCERN scores were greater for videos created by physicians versus non-physicians (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Overall, there is a lack of information on treatment benefits, risks, and mechanism of action. Given the mean GQS and DISCERN scores, the average video was of generally poor quality, creating potential for lack of knowledge and misinformation regarding HS. With the growing use of TikTok for educational purposes, improving content quality should be a priority to provide accurate information regarding medical conditions such as HS.
Hidradenitis Supprativa:TikTok内容质量的横断面研究
简介:TikTok是一个流行的社交媒体平台,有时被用来分享医疗信息。创作人分享他们在医疗诊断方面的经验或提供医疗诊断方面的教育。本研究调查了有关化脓性汗腺炎(HS)的TikTok视频的内容质量。方法:我们于2022年10月24日在TikTok上搜索#hidradenitissuppurativa,并按点赞数过滤。两名独立评论家分析了这些视频,排除了非英语、与HS无关和重复的视频。视频评分使用全球质量量表(GQS), 1个问题量表(1-差质量到5-优质量),以及辨别工具,16个问题分析(1-低质量到5-高质量)。结果:纳入100个视频。GQS平均得分为2.49 [SD 0.87], DISCERN平均得分为1.98 [SD 0.52],具有较高的互信度(Cohen 's Kappa 0.667)。26个视频(26%)由医生制作,74个(74%)由非医生制作。医生视频与非医生视频的GQS和DISCERN平均得分分别为3.40和2.62,2.16和1.75。医生制作的视频的GQS和DISCERN得分都高于非医生(p < 0.0001)。结论:总的来说,缺乏关于治疗益处、风险和作用机制的信息。考虑到GQS和DISCERN的平均分数,平均视频的质量一般较差,可能会造成关于HS的知识缺乏和错误信息。随着TikTok越来越多地用于教育目的,提高内容质量应该成为提供有关HS等医疗条件的准确信息的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信