How does quiz activity affect summative assessment outcomes? An analysis of three consecutive years’ data on self-directed learning

C. E. Oh, Hyun-Sook Hwang
{"title":"How does quiz activity affect summative assessment outcomes? An analysis of three consecutive years’ data on self-directed learning","authors":"C. E. Oh, Hyun-Sook Hwang","doi":"10.7180/kmj.22.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We investigated how quiz activities can improve summative assessment outcomes by analyzing the relationship between them. Methods: We used 217 first-year medical students’ medical informatics data from 3 consecutive years. We analyzed summative assessment outcomes between quiz completion and incompletion groups, one-time and multiple-time quiz learning groups, and three combined comparisons between subgroups of quiz learning activity frequencies: 1 versus 2, 3, 4, and 6 (group 1), 1 and 2 versus 3, 4, and 6 (group 2), and 1, 2, and 3 versus 4 and 6 (group 3). We then analyzed correlations between the final quiz scores and summative assessment outcomes. Results: The summative assessment means for students who completed quizzes and those who did not were 87.16±8.73 and 83.22±8.31, respectively ( p =0.001). The means for the one-time and multiple-time quiz learning groups were 86.54±8.94 and 88.71±8.10, respectively ( p =0.223). The means for combined subgroups were not significantly different between groups ( p >0.05), although a statistically significant increasing trend was found from groups 1 to 3 (0.223>0.203>0.075 using the t -test and 0.225>0.150>0.067 using the Mann-Whitney test, respectively). Summative assessment scores were not significantly correlated with quiz scores ( r =0.115, p =0.213). Conclusions: Quizzes helped students who used self-directed learning obtain better summative assessment outcomes. Formative quizzes presumably did not provide students with direct knowledge, but showed them their weak points and motivated them to work on areas where their knowledge was insufficient.","PeriodicalId":53015,"journal":{"name":"Kosin Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kosin Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7180/kmj.22.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: We investigated how quiz activities can improve summative assessment outcomes by analyzing the relationship between them. Methods: We used 217 first-year medical students’ medical informatics data from 3 consecutive years. We analyzed summative assessment outcomes between quiz completion and incompletion groups, one-time and multiple-time quiz learning groups, and three combined comparisons between subgroups of quiz learning activity frequencies: 1 versus 2, 3, 4, and 6 (group 1), 1 and 2 versus 3, 4, and 6 (group 2), and 1, 2, and 3 versus 4 and 6 (group 3). We then analyzed correlations between the final quiz scores and summative assessment outcomes. Results: The summative assessment means for students who completed quizzes and those who did not were 87.16±8.73 and 83.22±8.31, respectively ( p =0.001). The means for the one-time and multiple-time quiz learning groups were 86.54±8.94 and 88.71±8.10, respectively ( p =0.223). The means for combined subgroups were not significantly different between groups ( p >0.05), although a statistically significant increasing trend was found from groups 1 to 3 (0.223>0.203>0.075 using the t -test and 0.225>0.150>0.067 using the Mann-Whitney test, respectively). Summative assessment scores were not significantly correlated with quiz scores ( r =0.115, p =0.213). Conclusions: Quizzes helped students who used self-directed learning obtain better summative assessment outcomes. Formative quizzes presumably did not provide students with direct knowledge, but showed them their weak points and motivated them to work on areas where their knowledge was insufficient.
测验活动如何影响总结性评估结果?连续三年自主学习数据分析
背景:我们通过分析智力竞赛活动之间的关系,研究了智力竞赛活动如何提高总结性评估结果。方法:采用217名医学一年级学生连续3年的医学信息学资料。我们分析了测验完成组和未完成组、一次性和多次测验学习组之间的总结性评估结果,以及测验学习活动频率亚组之间的三个组合比较:1与2、3、4和6(第1组),1与2与3、4、6(第2组),以及1、2、3与4和6。然后,我们分析了期末测验成绩和总结性评估结果之间的相关性。结果:完成测验和未完成测验的学生的总结性评估均值分别为87.16±8.73和83.22±8.31(p=0.001)。一次性和多次测验学习组的均值分别为86.54±8.94和88.71±8.10(p=0.023)。组合亚组的均值在组间无显著差异(p>0.05),尽管从第1组到第3组发现了统计学上显著的增加趋势(分别使用t检验的0.223>0.203>0.075和使用Mann-Whitney检验的0.225>0.150>0.067)。总结性评估成绩与测验成绩无显著相关性(r=0.115,p=0.213)。结论:测验有助于使用自主学习的学生获得更好的总结性评估结果。据推测,形成性测验并没有为学生提供直接的知识,而是向他们展示了他们的弱点,并激励他们在知识不足的领域进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信