Gender Bias in German Media Reports

IF 0.4 4区 经济学 Q4 COMMUNICATION
Lea Bernhardt, R. Dewenter
{"title":"Gender Bias in German Media Reports","authors":"Lea Bernhardt, R. Dewenter","doi":"10.1080/08997764.2023.2182789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper, we empirically examine German media reports about politicians with regard to gender differences in the reporting. We analyze a comprehensive dataset with coded reports from both public and private media outlets between 1998 and 2012 and estimate the tonality of the coverage using logit models. Overall, we find a more or less balanced reporting with only small differences in the reporting about male and female politicians. An analysis of gender differences by the five largest political parties reveals some interesting results as women in the conservative parties are more likely to receive a positive media coverage than their fellow male party members. On the contrary, women in the Left Party are more likely to receive a negative media coverage. As the results are statistically significant but small in magnitude, we conclude that there is no substantial indication of a gender bias in German Media, although there are some interesting differences by political parties.","PeriodicalId":29945,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MEDIA ECONOMICS","volume":"34 1","pages":"266 - 283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MEDIA ECONOMICS","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08997764.2023.2182789","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, we empirically examine German media reports about politicians with regard to gender differences in the reporting. We analyze a comprehensive dataset with coded reports from both public and private media outlets between 1998 and 2012 and estimate the tonality of the coverage using logit models. Overall, we find a more or less balanced reporting with only small differences in the reporting about male and female politicians. An analysis of gender differences by the five largest political parties reveals some interesting results as women in the conservative parties are more likely to receive a positive media coverage than their fellow male party members. On the contrary, women in the Left Party are more likely to receive a negative media coverage. As the results are statistically significant but small in magnitude, we conclude that there is no substantial indication of a gender bias in German Media, although there are some interesting differences by political parties.
德国媒体报道中的性别偏见
摘要本文对德国媒体关于政治人物的报道中存在的性别差异进行实证研究。我们分析了一个综合数据集,其中包含1998年至2012年间来自公共和私营媒体的编码报告,并使用logit模型估计了报道的调性。总的来说,我们发现关于男性和女性政治家的报道或多或少是平衡的,只有很小的差异。一项对五大政党性别差异的分析揭示了一些有趣的结果,保守政党中的女性比男性党员更有可能得到媒体的正面报道。相反,左翼党的女性更容易受到媒体的负面报道。由于结果具有统计学意义,但幅度很小,我们得出结论,尽管政党之间存在一些有趣的差异,但德国媒体中没有实质性的性别偏见迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Journal of Media Economics publishes original research on the economics and policy of mediated communication, focusing on firms, markets, and institutions. Reflecting the increasing diversity of analytical approaches employed in economics and recognizing that policies promoting social and political objectives may have significant economic impacts on media, the Journal encourages submissions reflecting the insights of diverse disciplinary perspectives and research methodologies, both empirical and theoretical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信