“Functional approach” to esophageal body diverticula

M. Marchese, A. Capannolo, A. Giuliani, S. Valiyeva, F. Carlei, L. Lombardi
{"title":"“Functional approach” to esophageal body diverticula","authors":"M. Marchese, A. Capannolo, A. Giuliani, S. Valiyeva, F. Carlei, L. Lombardi","doi":"10.21037/AOE-2020-MEP-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Esophageal diverticula should be considered as epiphenomena of an esophageal motility disorder, thus a targeted approach should be taken into consideration when a treatment is indicated. Conventional surgical management consists in diverticulectomy or diverticulopexys, associated or not with a myotomy and/or fundoplication on the basis of the underlying motor disorder. A thorough endoscopic evaluation of the diverticulum, associated with a functional assessment of the esophageal motility is mandatory before the treatment. Surgical management of epiphrenic diverticula is often more challenging due to the long operation time and high postoperative complication and mortality rates, and reserved to referral centres. To date, despite the fact that diagnostic workup is now codified, there is not a solid consensus about the management of the diverticula, including the use of routine versus selective myotomy and whether or not a fundoplication should be included. Beyond its classical indications, recently the POEM technique has been applied for the performance of an endoscopic diverticulectomy by mean the submucosal myotomy of the diverticular septum. No literature data about the comparison between these different approaches are reported, so we reviewed literature data about the treatment modalities of diverticula of the esophageal body (mid-esophageal and epiphrenic), to highlight how to best address the choice.","PeriodicalId":72217,"journal":{"name":"Annals of esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOE-2020-MEP-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Esophageal diverticula should be considered as epiphenomena of an esophageal motility disorder, thus a targeted approach should be taken into consideration when a treatment is indicated. Conventional surgical management consists in diverticulectomy or diverticulopexys, associated or not with a myotomy and/or fundoplication on the basis of the underlying motor disorder. A thorough endoscopic evaluation of the diverticulum, associated with a functional assessment of the esophageal motility is mandatory before the treatment. Surgical management of epiphrenic diverticula is often more challenging due to the long operation time and high postoperative complication and mortality rates, and reserved to referral centres. To date, despite the fact that diagnostic workup is now codified, there is not a solid consensus about the management of the diverticula, including the use of routine versus selective myotomy and whether or not a fundoplication should be included. Beyond its classical indications, recently the POEM technique has been applied for the performance of an endoscopic diverticulectomy by mean the submucosal myotomy of the diverticular septum. No literature data about the comparison between these different approaches are reported, so we reviewed literature data about the treatment modalities of diverticula of the esophageal body (mid-esophageal and epiphrenic), to highlight how to best address the choice.
食道体憩室“功能入路”
食管憩室应被视为食管运动障碍的副现象,因此在需要治疗时应考虑有针对性的方法。传统的手术治疗包括憩室切除术或憩室固定术,根据潜在的运动障碍,合并或不合并肌切开术和/或基底复制术。在治疗前,必须对憩室进行彻底的内镜评估,并对食管运动进行功能评估。由于手术时间长,术后并发症和死亡率高,手术治疗往往更具挑战性,并保留给转诊中心。迄今为止,尽管诊断检查已被编纂,但对于憩室的治疗,包括常规与选择性肌切开术的使用,以及是否应包括基底切开术,并没有一个坚实的共识。除了其经典适应症外,最近POEM技术已被应用于内镜下憩室切除术,即憩室隔粘膜下肌切开术。目前还没有关于这些不同入路比较的文献报道,因此我们回顾了有关食管体憩室(食管中段和表肾段)治疗方式的文献资料,以强调如何最好地解决选择问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信