Book review: The Persistence of Slavery: An Economic History of Child Trafficking in Nigeria by Robin P. Chapdelaine

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
S. Duff
{"title":"Book review: The Persistence of Slavery: An Economic History of Child Trafficking in Nigeria by Robin P. Chapdelaine","authors":"S. Duff","doi":"10.1177/03631990221092992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and as a problem to solve. African Americans and Native Americans had less access to obtaining birth certificates. When they did possess them, the “fact” of their race created obstacles to employment, marriage, and voting rights. Due to pressure brought by multiple groups, including the NAACP, in 1968 the Census Bureau agreed to move “race/color” to a section of the birth certificate that remains, to this day, confidential state information. Pearson reveals the simultaneous meanings of race as a “fact” of the population and a construction that can bring harm to individuals. With these challenges to the birth certificate’s claim to truth by individuals and groups harmed by its growing authority over individual identity and populational policies, Pearson is easily able to bring this long history up to the current wave of “bathroom bills” and other legislation used to empower the facts of the birth control over the autonomy of trans-Americans to live their lives as their authentic selves. Both the state and private citizens have used birth certificates to discriminate against multiple groups in US history, but Pearson shows us that those discriminated against also have a history of action and agency in reshaping the birth certificate. In the closing of the book, Pearson lauds the flexibility of the fixed document that is the birth certificate: “If our documents are meant to say who we are, then we ought to have a say in our documents.” (292) Pearson is only able to craft this sweeping narrative of a complex, powerful document over 150 years with exhausting research. Or at least, research that appears in her notes as exhaustion-inducing (I cannot speak for her frame of mind or level of energy at the end of the project). By my count, Pearson visited eleven different archives in nine different states to dig through papers of both government agencies (such as the Bureau of Indian Affairs or the Children’s Bureau) and individuals at the center of birth registration debates (such as Lemuel Shattuck and Grace Abbott). Juggling personal correspondence, government reports, and newspaper articles (to name just a few source types) Pearson exhibits her dexterity and care as a researcher. Historians interested in any number of topics in twentieth-century America could find new research paths just with a close reading of her footnotes. In the end, Pearson crafts one of those fascinating histories of an entity of all our lives that has always seemed inevitable in the progress of American culture. When I teach graduate students about how to come up with a research question, I ask them to practice by just looking around them and asking: “why is that?” Pearson asked, “why is that?” about one of the most meaningful documents in the country and answered with an original and captivating story that forces us all, historian and American alike, to reconsider our understandings of the facts of our own births. The birth certificate marks all of us, from the very moment we arrive in the world, as belonging or not, and as valuable or not. It creates the fiction that we all naturally fit within socially constructed categories like gender, race, lineage, and developmental age. Pearson is deftly able to create a narrative that appeals to, and should be read by, historians in multiple fields. Weaving together narratives of politics, race, gender, health, and family, Pearson has produced a manuscript with chapters that instructors can easily use to teach US History or any range of more specialized classes. An important historiographical intervention into the links between state surveillance, public health, and constructions of race, The Birth Certificate is a timely and eye-opening book.","PeriodicalId":45991,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03631990221092992","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

and as a problem to solve. African Americans and Native Americans had less access to obtaining birth certificates. When they did possess them, the “fact” of their race created obstacles to employment, marriage, and voting rights. Due to pressure brought by multiple groups, including the NAACP, in 1968 the Census Bureau agreed to move “race/color” to a section of the birth certificate that remains, to this day, confidential state information. Pearson reveals the simultaneous meanings of race as a “fact” of the population and a construction that can bring harm to individuals. With these challenges to the birth certificate’s claim to truth by individuals and groups harmed by its growing authority over individual identity and populational policies, Pearson is easily able to bring this long history up to the current wave of “bathroom bills” and other legislation used to empower the facts of the birth control over the autonomy of trans-Americans to live their lives as their authentic selves. Both the state and private citizens have used birth certificates to discriminate against multiple groups in US history, but Pearson shows us that those discriminated against also have a history of action and agency in reshaping the birth certificate. In the closing of the book, Pearson lauds the flexibility of the fixed document that is the birth certificate: “If our documents are meant to say who we are, then we ought to have a say in our documents.” (292) Pearson is only able to craft this sweeping narrative of a complex, powerful document over 150 years with exhausting research. Or at least, research that appears in her notes as exhaustion-inducing (I cannot speak for her frame of mind or level of energy at the end of the project). By my count, Pearson visited eleven different archives in nine different states to dig through papers of both government agencies (such as the Bureau of Indian Affairs or the Children’s Bureau) and individuals at the center of birth registration debates (such as Lemuel Shattuck and Grace Abbott). Juggling personal correspondence, government reports, and newspaper articles (to name just a few source types) Pearson exhibits her dexterity and care as a researcher. Historians interested in any number of topics in twentieth-century America could find new research paths just with a close reading of her footnotes. In the end, Pearson crafts one of those fascinating histories of an entity of all our lives that has always seemed inevitable in the progress of American culture. When I teach graduate students about how to come up with a research question, I ask them to practice by just looking around them and asking: “why is that?” Pearson asked, “why is that?” about one of the most meaningful documents in the country and answered with an original and captivating story that forces us all, historian and American alike, to reconsider our understandings of the facts of our own births. The birth certificate marks all of us, from the very moment we arrive in the world, as belonging or not, and as valuable or not. It creates the fiction that we all naturally fit within socially constructed categories like gender, race, lineage, and developmental age. Pearson is deftly able to create a narrative that appeals to, and should be read by, historians in multiple fields. Weaving together narratives of politics, race, gender, health, and family, Pearson has produced a manuscript with chapters that instructors can easily use to teach US History or any range of more specialized classes. An important historiographical intervention into the links between state surveillance, public health, and constructions of race, The Birth Certificate is a timely and eye-opening book.
书评:《奴隶制的延续:尼日利亚贩卖儿童的经济史》,罗宾·p·查德莱恩著
并且作为一个需要解决的问题。非裔美国人和美洲原住民获得出生证明的机会较少。当他们拥有它们时,他们种族的“事实”为就业、婚姻和投票权制造了障碍。由于包括全国有色人种协进会在内的多个团体带来的压力,1968年,人口普查局同意将“种族/肤色”改为出生证明的一部分,直到今天,该部分仍然是国家机密信息。皮尔逊揭示了种族作为人口的“事实”和可能对个人造成伤害的结构的同时含义。由于出生证明在个人身份和人口政策方面的权威不断增强,个人和团体对出生证明的真实性提出了这些挑战,Pearson很容易将这段漫长的历史与当前的“浴室法案”和其他立法浪潮联系起来,这些法案旨在赋予跨性别美国人以真实自我生活的自主权以节育的事实。在美国历史上,国家和私人公民都曾使用出生证明歧视多个群体,但Pearson向我们表明,那些被歧视的人在重塑出生证明方面也有行动和代理的历史。在书的结尾,皮尔逊称赞了出生证明这一固定文件的灵活性:“如果我们的文件是为了说明我们是谁,那么我们应该在我们的文件中有发言权。”。或者至少,她笔记中出现的令人疲惫的研究(我无法代表她在项目结束时的心态或精力水平)。据我统计,皮尔逊访问了九个不同州的十一个不同档案馆,翻阅了政府机构(如印度事务局或儿童局)和出生登记辩论中心人物(如Lemuel Shattuck和Grace Abbott)的文件。皮尔森处理个人信件、政府报告和报纸文章(仅举几个来源类型),展现了她作为一名研究人员的灵活性和细心。对20世纪美国任何一个主题感兴趣的历史学家只要仔细阅读她的脚注,都可以找到新的研究道路。最后,皮尔逊创作了一部引人入胜的历史,讲述了我们所有人的生活,这在美国文化的进步中似乎总是不可避免的。当我教研究生们如何提出一个研究问题时,我会让他们练习,只是环顾四周,问:“为什么是这样?”皮尔森问,“为什么是那样?”关于这个国家最有意义的文件之一,并用一个原创而迷人的故事回答,这个故事迫使我们所有人,无论是历史学家还是美国人,重新考虑我们对自己出生事实的理解。出生证明标志着我们所有人,从我们来到这个世界的那一刻起,无论属于与否,无论是否有价值。它创造了一种虚构,我们都自然地属于社会构建的类别,如性别、种族、血统和发育年龄。皮尔逊巧妙地创造了一种叙事,吸引了多个领域的历史学家,也应该被他们阅读。皮尔逊将政治、种族、性别、健康和家庭的叙事交织在一起,制作了一份手稿,其中的章节可以很容易地用于教授美国历史或任何一系列更专业的课程。《出生证明》是一本及时而令人大开眼界的书,是对国家监控、公共卫生和种族结构之间联系的重要历史干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Journal of Family History is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes scholarly research from an international perspective concerning the family as a historical social form, with contributions from the disciplines of history, gender studies, economics, law, political science, policy studies, demography, anthropology, sociology, liberal arts, and the humanities. Themes including gender, sexuality, race, class, and culture are welcome. Its contents, which will be composed of both monographic and interpretative work (including full-length review essays and thematic fora), will reflect the international scope of research on the history of the family.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信