A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences with Telemedicine Opioid Use Disorder Treatment during Covid-19

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Rachel Lockard, K. Priest, J. Gregg, Bradley M Buchheit
{"title":"A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences with Telemedicine Opioid Use Disorder Treatment during Covid-19","authors":"Rachel Lockard, K. Priest, J. Gregg, Bradley M Buchheit","doi":"10.1080/08897077.2022.2060447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The drug-related overdose crisis worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. Recent drug policy changes to increase access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) during COVID-19 shifted some outpatient MOUD treatment into virtual settings to reduce the demand for in-person care. The objective of this study was to qualitatively explore what is gained and lost in virtual patient encounters for patients with opioid use disorder at a low-threshold, addiction treatment clinic that offers buprenorphine and harm reduction services. Methods: Patients were included in this study if they received care at the Harm Reduction and BRidges to Care (HRBR) clinic and utilized virtual visits between November 2019 and March 2021. The study was conceptualized using a health care access framework and prior studies of telemedicine acceptability. Semi-structured interviews were completed between March and April 2021. Interviews were dual-coded and analyzed using directed content analysis. Results: Nineteen interviews were conducted. The sample was predominantly White (84%) and stably housed (79%) with comparable gender (male, 53%) and employment status (employed, 42%). The majority (63%) of patients preferred virtual visits compared to in-person visits (16%) or a combination of access to both (21%). Two overarching tandem domains emerged: availability-accommodation and acceptability-appropriateness. Availability-accommodation reflected participants’ desires for immediate services and reduced transportation and work or caregiving scheduling barriers, which was facilitated by virtual visits. The acceptable-appropriate domain articulated how participants felt connected to their providers, whether through in-person interactions or the mutual trust experienced during virtual visits. Conclusions: Virtual visits were perceived by participants as a valuable and critical option for accessing treatment for OUD. While many participants preferred virtual visits, some favored face-to-face visits due to relational and physical interactions with providers. Participants desired flexibility and the ability to have a choice of treatment modality depending on their needs.","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":"43 1","pages":"1155 - 1162"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2022.2060447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background: The drug-related overdose crisis worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. Recent drug policy changes to increase access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) during COVID-19 shifted some outpatient MOUD treatment into virtual settings to reduce the demand for in-person care. The objective of this study was to qualitatively explore what is gained and lost in virtual patient encounters for patients with opioid use disorder at a low-threshold, addiction treatment clinic that offers buprenorphine and harm reduction services. Methods: Patients were included in this study if they received care at the Harm Reduction and BRidges to Care (HRBR) clinic and utilized virtual visits between November 2019 and March 2021. The study was conceptualized using a health care access framework and prior studies of telemedicine acceptability. Semi-structured interviews were completed between March and April 2021. Interviews were dual-coded and analyzed using directed content analysis. Results: Nineteen interviews were conducted. The sample was predominantly White (84%) and stably housed (79%) with comparable gender (male, 53%) and employment status (employed, 42%). The majority (63%) of patients preferred virtual visits compared to in-person visits (16%) or a combination of access to both (21%). Two overarching tandem domains emerged: availability-accommodation and acceptability-appropriateness. Availability-accommodation reflected participants’ desires for immediate services and reduced transportation and work or caregiving scheduling barriers, which was facilitated by virtual visits. The acceptable-appropriate domain articulated how participants felt connected to their providers, whether through in-person interactions or the mutual trust experienced during virtual visits. Conclusions: Virtual visits were perceived by participants as a valuable and critical option for accessing treatment for OUD. While many participants preferred virtual visits, some favored face-to-face visits due to relational and physical interactions with providers. Participants desired flexibility and the ability to have a choice of treatment modality depending on their needs.
新型冠状病毒肺炎期间远程医疗阿片类药物使用障碍治疗患者体验的定性研究
背景:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,药物过量危机恶化。最近,为增加COVID-19期间阿片类药物使用障碍药物的可及性,药物政策发生了变化,将一些阿片类药物使用障碍门诊治疗转移到虚拟环境中,以减少对面对面护理的需求。本研究的目的是定性地探讨在提供丁丙诺啡和减少危害服务的低阈值成瘾治疗诊所中,阿片类药物使用障碍患者在虚拟患者遭遇中的得失。方法:如果患者在2019年11月至2021年3月期间在减少伤害和护理桥梁(HRBR)诊所接受治疗并使用虚拟就诊,则将其纳入本研究。该研究是概念化使用卫生保健获取框架和远程医疗可接受性的先前研究。半结构化访谈于2021年3月至4月完成。访谈采用双重编码,并使用定向内容分析进行分析。结果:共进行了19次访谈。样本主要是白人(84%),居住稳定(79%),性别(男性,53%)和就业状况(就业,42%)相似。大多数(63%)患者更喜欢虚拟就诊,而不是亲自就诊(16%)或两者的结合(21%)。出现了两个首要的串联领域:可用性-适应性和可接受性-适当性。可用性-住宿反映了参与者对即时服务的渴望,减少了交通和工作或护理安排障碍,虚拟访问促进了这一点。可接受的适当领域阐明了参与者如何感受到与他们的提供者的联系,无论是通过面对面的互动还是通过虚拟访问期间的相互信任。结论:参与者认为虚拟就诊是获得OUD治疗的一个有价值和关键的选择。虽然许多参与者更喜欢虚拟访问,但由于与提供者的关系和身体互动,一些人更喜欢面对面访问。参与者希望根据自己的需要有灵活性和选择治疗方式的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance abuse
Substance abuse SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its 4th decade of publication, Substance Abuse journal is a peer-reviewed journal that serves as the official publication of Association for Medical Education and Research in Substance Abuse (AMERSA) in association with The International Society of Addiction Medicine (ISAM) and the International Coalition for Addiction Studies in Education (INCASE). Substance Abuse journal offers wide-ranging coverage for healthcare professionals, addiction specialists and others engaged in research, education, clinical care, and service delivery and evaluation. It features articles on a variety of topics, including: Interdisciplinary addiction research, education, and treatment Clinical trial, epidemiology, health services, and translation addiction research Implementation science related to addiction Innovations and subsequent outcomes in addiction education Addiction policy and opinion International addiction topics Clinical care regarding addictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信