‘A Poem Made Flesh’: Necromancing the Sovereignty Goddess in Emma Donoghue’s Hood

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERARY REVIEWS
Lauren Cassidy
{"title":"‘A Poem Made Flesh’: Necromancing the Sovereignty Goddess in Emma Donoghue’s Hood","authors":"Lauren Cassidy","doi":"10.3366/iur.2023.0596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores the role of the sovereignty goddess in Emma Donoghue’s Hood (1995) and its protagonist’s efforts to come to terms with the death of her newly deceased girlfriend. Taking its impetus from Donoghue’s self-characterization as a literary ‘grave robber’, this essay examines how Hood’s protagonist, Pen, necromances the sovereignty goddess in an effort to produce and legitimize a recognizable lesbian subject in late twentieth-century Ireland. Framing Donoghue’s queer, feminist engagement with the goddess in relation to Mikhail Bakhtin’s theorization of the ‘chronotope’ – a narratological device that expresses a novel’s interfused time and space – this essay illustrates how Pen’s posthumous re-construction of her partner, Cara, comes to function as an anthropomorphic chronotope, whose body delineates the temporal, geographical, and generic boundaries of the novel. At the same time, drawing on Kristevan notions of abjection, it also traces how the simulacrum of Cara’s corpse decays across the novel, and explores the implications of this dissolution on the viability of the queer sovereignty mode the novel envisages. Refiguring the novel as a gothic tale about lesbian love, death, and grief, this essay demonstrates how Hood deploys an abject sovereignty goddess to both deconstruct the nightmare of Ireland’s social and cultural history, and produce inchoate, utopian daydreams for the nation’s future. In doing so, it argues that Hood performs a post-mortem on both Cara’s memory and the sovereignty tradition itself, resurrecting the goddess to mourn the Irish canon’s hetero-patriarchal sovereignty tradition, even as it facilitates the necromantic conversion of Ireland into a queer nation.","PeriodicalId":43277,"journal":{"name":"IRISH UNIVERSITY REVIEW","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRISH UNIVERSITY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/iur.2023.0596","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY REVIEWS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay explores the role of the sovereignty goddess in Emma Donoghue’s Hood (1995) and its protagonist’s efforts to come to terms with the death of her newly deceased girlfriend. Taking its impetus from Donoghue’s self-characterization as a literary ‘grave robber’, this essay examines how Hood’s protagonist, Pen, necromances the sovereignty goddess in an effort to produce and legitimize a recognizable lesbian subject in late twentieth-century Ireland. Framing Donoghue’s queer, feminist engagement with the goddess in relation to Mikhail Bakhtin’s theorization of the ‘chronotope’ – a narratological device that expresses a novel’s interfused time and space – this essay illustrates how Pen’s posthumous re-construction of her partner, Cara, comes to function as an anthropomorphic chronotope, whose body delineates the temporal, geographical, and generic boundaries of the novel. At the same time, drawing on Kristevan notions of abjection, it also traces how the simulacrum of Cara’s corpse decays across the novel, and explores the implications of this dissolution on the viability of the queer sovereignty mode the novel envisages. Refiguring the novel as a gothic tale about lesbian love, death, and grief, this essay demonstrates how Hood deploys an abject sovereignty goddess to both deconstruct the nightmare of Ireland’s social and cultural history, and produce inchoate, utopian daydreams for the nation’s future. In doing so, it argues that Hood performs a post-mortem on both Cara’s memory and the sovereignty tradition itself, resurrecting the goddess to mourn the Irish canon’s hetero-patriarchal sovereignty tradition, even as it facilitates the necromantic conversion of Ireland into a queer nation.
“一首变成肉体的诗”:为艾玛·多诺霍的《胡德》中的主权女神赋予死灵
本文探讨了艾玛·多诺霍(Emma Donoghue)的《胡德》(Hood)(1995)中主权女神的角色,以及主人公如何努力接受她刚刚去世的女友的死亡。这篇文章以多诺霍作为文学“盗墓者”的自我描述为动力,探讨了胡德的主人公潘如何在20世纪末的爱尔兰塑造一个公认的女同性恋主题并使其合法化。将多诺霍与女神的酷儿、女权主义接触与米哈伊尔·巴赫金的“时间托普”理论联系起来 – 一种叙述手法,表达小说的时间和空间交织 – 这篇文章展示了潘死后对她的伴侣卡拉的重新塑造,如何成为一个拟人化的时间托普,他的身体描绘了小说的时间、地理和一般界限。同时,它还借鉴了Kristevan的弃绝概念,追溯了卡拉尸体的模拟物是如何在小说中腐烂的,并探讨了这种解体对小说所设想的酷儿主权模式的可行性的影响。这篇文章将这部小说改编为一个关于女同性恋爱情、死亡和悲伤的哥特式故事,展示了胡德如何利用一个卑鄙的主权女神来解构爱尔兰社会和文化历史的噩梦,并为国家的未来产生早期的乌托邦式白日梦。在这样做的过程中,它认为胡德对卡拉的记忆和主权传统本身进行了事后剖析,复活了女神,以悼念爱尔兰正典的异父权主权传统,尽管这有助于爱尔兰变成一个同性恋国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IRISH UNIVERSITY REVIEW
IRISH UNIVERSITY REVIEW LITERARY REVIEWS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Since its launch in 1970, the Irish University Review has sought to foster and publish the best scholarly research and critical debate in Irish literary and cultural studies. The first issue contained contributions by Austin Clarke, John Montague, Sean O"Faolain, and Conor Cruise O"Brien, among others. Today, the journal publishes the best literary and cultural criticism by established and emerging scholars in Irish Studies. It is published twice annually, in the Spring and Autumn of each year. The journal is based in University College Dublin, where it was founded in 1970 by Professor Maurice Harmon, who edited the journal from 1970 to 1987. It has subsequently been edited by Professor Christopher Murray (1987-1997).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信