More than six months delay in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with a higher risk of pre-reconstruction meniscal and chondral damage

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
M. Safdari, Abdolshakur Rasuli Ostadi, Nahid Makhmalbaf, Mahshid Makhmalbaf, H. Makhmalbaf
{"title":"More than six months delay in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with a higher risk of pre-reconstruction meniscal and chondral damage","authors":"M. Safdari, Abdolshakur Rasuli Ostadi, Nahid Makhmalbaf, Mahshid Makhmalbaf, H. Makhmalbaf","doi":"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is no consensus regarding the optimal timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and its clinical importance. Here, we compared the rate of the pre-reconstruction meniscus and cartilage injury, also the knee function, between the early ACLR (within six months of injury) and late ACLR (after six months of the injury). Methods: Retrospectively, 192 patients with an ACL tear who underwent ACLR within six months of injury (n=53) or after six months of injury (n=132) were included. Autograft bone patellar tendon bone was used as the graft choice. The rate of pre-reconstruction meniscal injury and chondral damage (Outerbridge classification) was compared between the two groups. The knee function, evaluated in the last follow-up using the Lysholm knee scale, was also compared. Results: The mean time from injury to surgery was 3.9±1.3 mo in the early group and 8.8±2.3 mo in the late group The pre-reconstruction meniscal injury was detected in 24 (45.3%) patients in the early ACLR group and 93 (66.9%) patients in the late ACLR group (P=0.006). Pre-reconstruction chondral damage was detected in six (11.3%) patients of the early ACLR group and 32 (23%) patients of the late ACLR group (P=0.049). The mean Lysholm knee scale was 86.7±6 (range 82-92) in the early ACLR group and 81.9±4.4 (range 80-84) in the late ACLR group (P<0.001). Conclusion: The higher rate of pre-reconstruction meniscal and chondral damage and lower functional score in the late ACLR group suggests avoiding ACLR delay more than six months after the injury. Level of Evidence: IV.","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"34 1","pages":"176 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is no consensus regarding the optimal timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and its clinical importance. Here, we compared the rate of the pre-reconstruction meniscus and cartilage injury, also the knee function, between the early ACLR (within six months of injury) and late ACLR (after six months of the injury). Methods: Retrospectively, 192 patients with an ACL tear who underwent ACLR within six months of injury (n=53) or after six months of injury (n=132) were included. Autograft bone patellar tendon bone was used as the graft choice. The rate of pre-reconstruction meniscal injury and chondral damage (Outerbridge classification) was compared between the two groups. The knee function, evaluated in the last follow-up using the Lysholm knee scale, was also compared. Results: The mean time from injury to surgery was 3.9±1.3 mo in the early group and 8.8±2.3 mo in the late group The pre-reconstruction meniscal injury was detected in 24 (45.3%) patients in the early ACLR group and 93 (66.9%) patients in the late ACLR group (P=0.006). Pre-reconstruction chondral damage was detected in six (11.3%) patients of the early ACLR group and 32 (23%) patients of the late ACLR group (P=0.049). The mean Lysholm knee scale was 86.7±6 (range 82-92) in the early ACLR group and 81.9±4.4 (range 80-84) in the late ACLR group (P<0.001). Conclusion: The higher rate of pre-reconstruction meniscal and chondral damage and lower functional score in the late ACLR group suggests avoiding ACLR delay more than six months after the injury. Level of Evidence: IV.
前交叉韧带重建延迟六个月以上与重建前半月板和软骨损伤的风险较高有关
背景:关于前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)的最佳时机及其临床重要性尚无共识。在这里,我们比较了早期ACLR(损伤后6个月内)和晚期ACLR(损伤后6个月)重建前半月板和软骨损伤的发生率,以及膝关节功能。方法:回顾性分析192例前交叉韧带撕裂患者,分别在损伤6个月内(53例)和损伤6个月后(132例)行ACLR。自体骨移植髌腱骨作为移植骨的选择。比较两组重建前半月板损伤及软骨损伤发生率(Outerbridge分级)。在最后一次随访中使用Lysholm膝关节量表评估膝关节功能,并进行比较。结果:早期组损伤至手术的平均时间为3.9±1.3个月,晚期组为8.8±2.3个月。早期ACLR组有24例(45.3%),晚期ACLR组有93例(66.9%),(P=0.006)。早期ACLR组6例(11.3%)、晚期ACLR组32例(23%)存在重建前软骨损伤(P=0.049)。早期ACLR组Lysholm膝关节评分平均为86.7±6(范围82 ~ 92),晚期ACLR组Lysholm膝关节评分平均为81.9±4.4(范围80 ~ 84)(P<0.001)。结论:晚期ACLR组重建前半月板和软骨损伤发生率较高,功能评分较低,提示ACLR延迟应避免超过6个月。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信