Percepción y Accesibilidad Tecnológica de Universitarios en el Suroeste de República Dominicana durante el Covid-19

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Leandro M. Santos, D. Grisales, José Suero Rico
{"title":"Percepción y Accesibilidad Tecnológica de Universitarios en el Suroeste de República Dominicana durante el Covid-19","authors":"Leandro M. Santos, D. Grisales, José Suero Rico","doi":"10.15366/RIEJS2021.10.1.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pandemic led to suspension of face-to-face classes and the implementation of virtual education. The objective of this study was to diagnose and analyze the perception of university students and their technological accessibility during the educational emergency in the southwest of the Dominican Republic (January-April 2020). A mixed research method was used, a survey was applied, and responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and statistical inference, descriptive analysis, and semantic network construction. Regarding technological accessibility, the results show that the use of phones predominates rather than computers and lack of Internet access. According to students there are more negative aspects than positives in virtual education, as technological equipment and internet accessibility are lacking, resulting in frustration and discomfort, as well as learning difficulties. Also, the overload of subjects and activities, since more than 60 tasks were assigned to develop in a month, which for them shows insensitivity of teachers in the face of the situation. Social distancing generated anxiety due to isolation and lack of concentration for learning. Among the positive aspects is the use of technology, which facilitates learning and allows the continuity of studies.","PeriodicalId":44141,"journal":{"name":"Revista Internacional de Educacion para la Justicia Social","volume":"10 1","pages":"145-165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Internacional de Educacion para la Justicia Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15366/RIEJS2021.10.1.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The pandemic led to suspension of face-to-face classes and the implementation of virtual education. The objective of this study was to diagnose and analyze the perception of university students and their technological accessibility during the educational emergency in the southwest of the Dominican Republic (January-April 2020). A mixed research method was used, a survey was applied, and responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and statistical inference, descriptive analysis, and semantic network construction. Regarding technological accessibility, the results show that the use of phones predominates rather than computers and lack of Internet access. According to students there are more negative aspects than positives in virtual education, as technological equipment and internet accessibility are lacking, resulting in frustration and discomfort, as well as learning difficulties. Also, the overload of subjects and activities, since more than 60 tasks were assigned to develop in a month, which for them shows insensitivity of teachers in the face of the situation. Social distancing generated anxiety due to isolation and lack of concentration for learning. Among the positive aspects is the use of technology, which facilitates learning and allows the continuity of studies.
新冠疫情期间多米尼加共和国西南部大学生的感知和技术可及性
大流行导致面对面课程暂停,并实施虚拟教育。本研究的目的是诊断和分析多米尼加共和国西南部(2020年1月至4月)教育紧急情况下大学生及其技术可及性的感知。本研究采用混合研究方法,采用问卷调查法,采用描述性统计与统计推断、描述性分析、语义网络构建等方法对调查结果进行分析。关于技术可及性,结果表明,使用手机占主导地位,而不是电脑和缺乏互联网接入。学生们认为,虚拟教育的负面因素多于正面因素,因为缺乏技术设备和互联网可访问性,导致挫折和不适,以及学习困难。另外,一个月要开发的课题超过60个,科目和活动过多,这也说明教师面对形势的不敏感。由于孤立和无法集中注意力学习,社交距离产生了焦虑。积极的方面之一是技术的使用,它促进了学习并允许学习的连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信