{"title":"A Declamation on a Sopatrian Model: P.Hamb. II 134 Reconsidered","authors":"N. Kanavou, Amphilochios Papathomas","doi":"10.1080/00397679.2020.1718394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we revisit P.Hamb. II 134, which preserves a fragmentary declamation on the familiar aristeus theme, suggest a number of improvements to the text and provide an English translation. We further argue that the speaker in our piece is an aristeus, probably a father, who addresses his son, a deserter, in opposition to recent interpretations that reckon the speaker to be a deserter–father and the addressee to be his aristeus–son. Our interpretation evokes a scenario that is found in Sopater 5.44.27–45.10 Walz. Based on the fragment's content and style, we suggest that either Sopater or his contemporary Libanius could be the author of the lost declamation partially transmitted by this fragment.","PeriodicalId":41733,"journal":{"name":"Symbolae Osloenses","volume":"94 1","pages":"157 - 168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00397679.2020.1718394","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symbolae Osloenses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00397679.2020.1718394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, we revisit P.Hamb. II 134, which preserves a fragmentary declamation on the familiar aristeus theme, suggest a number of improvements to the text and provide an English translation. We further argue that the speaker in our piece is an aristeus, probably a father, who addresses his son, a deserter, in opposition to recent interpretations that reckon the speaker to be a deserter–father and the addressee to be his aristeus–son. Our interpretation evokes a scenario that is found in Sopater 5.44.27–45.10 Walz. Based on the fragment's content and style, we suggest that either Sopater or his contemporary Libanius could be the author of the lost declamation partially transmitted by this fragment.