Is conceptual learning based on conceptual change text (CCT) effectively applied to pgsd students science class?

Wati Sukmawati, Sri Lestari Handayani, Yeni Yeni
{"title":"Is conceptual learning based on conceptual change text (CCT) effectively applied to pgsd students science class?","authors":"Wati Sukmawati, Sri Lestari Handayani, Yeni Yeni","doi":"10.21831/jipi.v7i2.44034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For Elementary School Teacher Education (PGSD) students, the introductory science concept course is part of the compulsory course. The understanding of PGSD students in basic science concepts will affect the quality of learning in the classroom. This research was conducted in odd semesters with 60 students who attended lectures on basic science concepts, and the sample selection was made randomly. To collect data on the effectiveness of the implementation of CCT, instruments used in the form of cognitive and clinical test questions have gone through validation and reliability tests. In the study, students were divided into two groups: the experimental group using CCT-based contextual learning as teaching materials and the control class using ordinary teaching materials. Based on the N-Gain data found in the field, there was a significant difference between the experimental and control groups; the control class had an N-Gain value of 0.54 while the experimental class was 0.81. The data revealed that learning using CCT successfully increased students' understanding of concepts in the material cycle and better environment compared to the control class. However, based on interview data, both experimental and control class students were interested in learning the concept of the energy cycle and environmental pollution, and there was no significant difference.","PeriodicalId":30901,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v7i2.44034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For Elementary School Teacher Education (PGSD) students, the introductory science concept course is part of the compulsory course. The understanding of PGSD students in basic science concepts will affect the quality of learning in the classroom. This research was conducted in odd semesters with 60 students who attended lectures on basic science concepts, and the sample selection was made randomly. To collect data on the effectiveness of the implementation of CCT, instruments used in the form of cognitive and clinical test questions have gone through validation and reliability tests. In the study, students were divided into two groups: the experimental group using CCT-based contextual learning as teaching materials and the control class using ordinary teaching materials. Based on the N-Gain data found in the field, there was a significant difference between the experimental and control groups; the control class had an N-Gain value of 0.54 while the experimental class was 0.81. The data revealed that learning using CCT successfully increased students' understanding of concepts in the material cycle and better environment compared to the control class. However, based on interview data, both experimental and control class students were interested in learning the concept of the energy cycle and environmental pollution, and there was no significant difference.
基于概念变化文本(CCT)的概念学习是否有效地应用于pgsd学生的科学课?
科学概念导论课程是小学师范教育学生的必修课程之一。PGSD学生对基础科学概念的理解将影响课堂学习的质量。本研究以奇数学期为单位对60名参加基础科学概念讲座的学生进行研究,样本选择是随机的。为了收集CCT实施有效性的数据,以认知和临床测试问题的形式使用的工具经过了验证和信度测试。在研究中,学生被分为两组:实验组使用基于cct的情境学习作为教材,对照组使用普通教材。根据田间N-Gain数据,实验组与对照组之间存在显著差异;对照组的N-Gain值为0.54,实验组的N-Gain值为0.81。数据显示,与对照组相比,使用CCT学习成功地增加了学生对材料循环概念的理解和更好的环境。然而,从访谈数据来看,实验班和控制班的学生对能源循环和环境污染概念的学习都有兴趣,且没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信