Desafios da Interdisciplinaridade no Ensino Superior: o Papel do Coordenador de Curso nos “Projetos e Atividades Especiais – PAES”

IF 0.4 Q4 MANAGEMENT
David Garcia Penof, Sandra Bergamini Leonardo, Milton Carlos Farina
{"title":"Desafios da Interdisciplinaridade no Ensino Superior: o Papel do Coordenador de Curso nos “Projetos e Atividades Especiais – PAES”","authors":"David Garcia Penof, Sandra Bergamini Leonardo, Milton Carlos Farina","doi":"10.13058/RAEP.2020.V21N1.1523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a descriptive exploratory study carried out in a Brazilian Higher Education Institution (IES) with the participation of the coordinators for their importance in the joint actions among courses. This work analyzed the relationship among coordinators and how well they know and promote interdisciplinary actions based on the Projects and Special Activities (PAEs) developed in the institution. Besides, the coordinators evaluated the dimensions considered essential for the success of interdisciplinary work. The questionnaire data answered by the coordinators were interpreted through the Social Network Analysis (ARS) using UciNet V6 software. It was concluded that interdisciplinary actions are incipient among the coordinators. The “Effective Communication” dimension had the higher score among respondents to consolidate interdisciplinarity. On the other hand, the dimension “Individual characteristics” had the lowest score. Individual actions are highlighted to promote and disseminate interdisciplinary activities and interdisciplinarity is on the agenda of the IES, but there is no evidence of institutional action to strengthen the relationship among coordinators. Characteristics of the coordinator and or course make certain courses appear as “islands of knowledge”.","PeriodicalId":53951,"journal":{"name":"Administracao-Ensino e Pesquisa","volume":"21 1","pages":"24-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administracao-Ensino e Pesquisa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13058/RAEP.2020.V21N1.1523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This is a descriptive exploratory study carried out in a Brazilian Higher Education Institution (IES) with the participation of the coordinators for their importance in the joint actions among courses. This work analyzed the relationship among coordinators and how well they know and promote interdisciplinary actions based on the Projects and Special Activities (PAEs) developed in the institution. Besides, the coordinators evaluated the dimensions considered essential for the success of interdisciplinary work. The questionnaire data answered by the coordinators were interpreted through the Social Network Analysis (ARS) using UciNet V6 software. It was concluded that interdisciplinary actions are incipient among the coordinators. The “Effective Communication” dimension had the higher score among respondents to consolidate interdisciplinarity. On the other hand, the dimension “Individual characteristics” had the lowest score. Individual actions are highlighted to promote and disseminate interdisciplinary activities and interdisciplinarity is on the agenda of the IES, but there is no evidence of institutional action to strengthen the relationship among coordinators. Characteristics of the coordinator and or course make certain courses appear as “islands of knowledge”.
高等教育跨学科的挑战:课程协调员在“项目和特殊活动-PAES”中的作用
这是一项在巴西高等教育机构(IES)进行的描述性探索性研究,由于协调员在课程间联合行动中的重要性,他们参与了研究。这项工作分析了协调员之间的关系,以及他们如何了解和促进基于该机构制定的项目和特别活动(PAEs)的跨学科行动。此外,协调员还评价了被认为对跨学科工作的成功至关重要的各方面。协调员回答的问卷数据通过使用UciNet V6软件的社会网络分析(ARS)进行解释。结论是,协调员之间的跨学科行动刚刚开始。被调查者在“有效沟通”维度上得分较高,以巩固跨学科性。另一方面,“个人特征”维度得分最低。强调了促进和传播跨学科活动的个人行动,跨学科也列入了IES的议程,但没有证据表明机构采取了行动来加强协调员之间的关系。协调者和课程的特点使得某些课程出现了“知识孤岛”的现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信