Psychotherapy during social isolation caused by COVID-19 – therapists’ and clients’ perspectives

IF 0.1 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Psychoterapia Pub Date : 2021-06-15 DOI:10.12740/pt/134717
Julia Kluzowicz, Maria Kluzowicz
{"title":"Psychotherapy during social isolation caused by COVID-19 – therapists’ and clients’ perspectives","authors":"Julia Kluzowicz, Maria Kluzowicz","doi":"10.12740/pt/134717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The article presents the results of a survey conducted on a group of 155 respondents - 54 psychotherapists and 101 psychotherapy clients. The subject of the study was their attitude towards remote psychotherapy in a situation of social isolation, which forced them to conduct therapy sessions remotely. The study also looked at the perception of difficulties and advantages of remote psychotherapy and changes in the therapist-client contact in such therapy. Methods: The research was conducted in the form of an online questionnaire sent by e-mail and posted on the profiles of thematic groups on the Facebook platform. Results: The vast majority of respondents continued psychotherapy during social isolation, despite the fact that most of them had not had contact with this form of therapeutic work before. The most frequently chosen method of holding sessions by both psychotherapists and clients was contact via an audio-video connection, less often by telephone. The greatest difficulty indicated in both of these forms was the lack of direct contact with the interlocutor. However, psychotherapists pointed out that remote psychotherapy may be more convenient for the client than traditionally conducted in direct contact. Most of the respondents agreed with the statement that during social isolation they became convinced about remote psychotherapy, although they do not consider it to be a better form than the traditional one. Conclusions: Social isolation caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus forced a sudden change in the form of psychotherapeutic work in Poland, for which most of its participants were not prepared. The results showing the most important limitations and advantages of remote psychotherapy may be a guide to educating future generations of psychotherapists, who - as the current situation shows - must also be prepared for the form of remote assistance.","PeriodicalId":41405,"journal":{"name":"Psychoterapia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12740/pt/134717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The article presents the results of a survey conducted on a group of 155 respondents - 54 psychotherapists and 101 psychotherapy clients. The subject of the study was their attitude towards remote psychotherapy in a situation of social isolation, which forced them to conduct therapy sessions remotely. The study also looked at the perception of difficulties and advantages of remote psychotherapy and changes in the therapist-client contact in such therapy. Methods: The research was conducted in the form of an online questionnaire sent by e-mail and posted on the profiles of thematic groups on the Facebook platform. Results: The vast majority of respondents continued psychotherapy during social isolation, despite the fact that most of them had not had contact with this form of therapeutic work before. The most frequently chosen method of holding sessions by both psychotherapists and clients was contact via an audio-video connection, less often by telephone. The greatest difficulty indicated in both of these forms was the lack of direct contact with the interlocutor. However, psychotherapists pointed out that remote psychotherapy may be more convenient for the client than traditionally conducted in direct contact. Most of the respondents agreed with the statement that during social isolation they became convinced about remote psychotherapy, although they do not consider it to be a better form than the traditional one. Conclusions: Social isolation caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus forced a sudden change in the form of psychotherapeutic work in Poland, for which most of its participants were not prepared. The results showing the most important limitations and advantages of remote psychotherapy may be a guide to educating future generations of psychotherapists, who - as the current situation shows - must also be prepared for the form of remote assistance.
COVID-19造成的社会隔离期间的心理治疗——治疗师和来访者的观点
目的:本文介绍了一项对155名受访者(54名心理治疗师和101名心理治疗客户)进行的调查结果。这项研究的主题是他们在社会孤立的情况下对远程心理治疗的态度,这种情况迫使他们远程进行治疗。该研究还观察了远程心理治疗的困难和优势的感知,以及在这种治疗中治疗师与客户接触的变化。方法:通过电子邮件发送在线调查问卷,并在Facebook平台的专题群组资料中发布。结果:绝大多数答复者在社会隔离期间继续进行心理治疗,尽管他们中的大多数人以前没有接触过这种形式的治疗工作。心理治疗师和客户最常选择的举行会议的方法是通过音频-视频联系,较少使用电话。这两种形式所指出的最大困难是缺乏与对话者的直接接触。然而,心理治疗师指出,远程心理治疗可能比传统的直接接触更方便。大多数答复者同意这样一种说法,即在社会隔离期间,他们开始相信远程心理治疗,尽管他们不认为这是一种比传统治疗更好的形式。结论:SARS-CoV-2病毒造成的社会隔离迫使波兰心理治疗工作的形式突然发生变化,大多数参与者对此没有准备。结果显示了远程心理治疗的最重要的局限性和优势,这可能是教育未来几代心理治疗师的指南,正如目前的情况所显示的那样,他们也必须为远程援助的形式做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychoterapia
Psychoterapia PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书