Direct democracy and the rise of political entrepreneurs

Q3 Social Sciences
Dario Čepo, Dario Nikić Čakar
{"title":"Direct democracy and the rise of political entrepreneurs","authors":"Dario Čepo, Dario Nikić Čakar","doi":"10.20901/an.16.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the last decade saw a rise in the use of direct democracy in croatia. the proliferation of citizens' initiatives and referendums was meant to activate politically passive citizens and to strengthen their role as controllers of the executive. our research, based on the qualitative analysis of the legal framework on citizens' initiatives and referendums in croatia, as well as post-2010 initiatives, showed that this was not the case. instead, political and social entrepreneurs, both long established, like trade unions, and newly formed, like conservative civil society organizations, used the tools of direct democracy to promote their particular anti-minority, anti-government or anti-establishment agendas. they succeeded in both constraining the power of the elite through the process of getting to the referendum and wresting control over the agenda-setting process post hoc. the added value of this paper lies in showing that citizens' initiatives can succeed in getting their demands met even when they are not successful in organizing referendums, which is due to weaknesses in the legal framework surrounding referendums and initiatives.","PeriodicalId":39082,"journal":{"name":"Anali Hrvatskog Politoloskog Drustva","volume":"16 1","pages":"27-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20901/an.16.02","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anali Hrvatskog Politoloskog Drustva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20901/an.16.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

the last decade saw a rise in the use of direct democracy in croatia. the proliferation of citizens' initiatives and referendums was meant to activate politically passive citizens and to strengthen their role as controllers of the executive. our research, based on the qualitative analysis of the legal framework on citizens' initiatives and referendums in croatia, as well as post-2010 initiatives, showed that this was not the case. instead, political and social entrepreneurs, both long established, like trade unions, and newly formed, like conservative civil society organizations, used the tools of direct democracy to promote their particular anti-minority, anti-government or anti-establishment agendas. they succeeded in both constraining the power of the elite through the process of getting to the referendum and wresting control over the agenda-setting process post hoc. the added value of this paper lies in showing that citizens' initiatives can succeed in getting their demands met even when they are not successful in organizing referendums, which is due to weaknesses in the legal framework surrounding referendums and initiatives.
直接民主和政治企业家的崛起
在过去十年中,克罗地亚使用直接民主的情况有所增加。公民倡议和公民投票的激增旨在激活政治上被动的公民,并加强他们作为行政控制者的作用。我们的研究基于对克罗地亚公民倡议和公投的法律框架的定性分析,以及2010年后的倡议,表明情况并非如此。相反,政治和社会企业家,无论是老牌的(如工会),还是新成立的(如保守的公民社会组织),都利用直接民主的工具来推动他们特定的反少数群体、反政府或反建制的议程。他们成功地通过进行全民公决的过程限制了精英的权力,并在事后夺取了对议程设置过程的控制权。本文的附加价值在于表明,即使公民倡议未能成功组织公投,他们的要求也能成功得到满足,这是由于围绕公投和倡议的法律框架存在缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anali Hrvatskog Politoloskog Drustva
Anali Hrvatskog Politoloskog Drustva Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信