What elements of the exercise prescription process should clinicians consider when prescribing exercise for musculoskeletal rehabilitation in a one on one setting? A review of the literature and primer for exercise prescription
{"title":"What elements of the exercise prescription process should clinicians consider when prescribing exercise for musculoskeletal rehabilitation in a one on one setting? A review of the literature and primer for exercise prescription","authors":"Samantha S. Smith, P. Osmotherly, D. Rivett","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2022.2139060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Despite exercise being a fundamental component of musculoskeletal rehabilitation, there is a lack concise, evidence-based recommendations to inform the clinician’s development of rehabilitative exercise programs for patients in a one-on-one rehabilitation setting. Current evidence is widely dispersed throughout the literature, with each paper addressing one element of the exercise prescription process in isolation. Objectives The aim of this review is to draw together current and available literature to summarise the elements of the exercise prescription process that a clinician should consider when prescribing exercises programs for musculoskeletal rehabilitation in a one-on-one setting. Methods Literature was first obtained by database searches, then hand searches were performed based on the reference lists from papers from the original search. Literature was then summarised and synthesised to create a collation of the elements of the exercise prescription process a clinician should consider for musculoskeletal rehabilitation in a one-on-one setting. Major Findings The reviewed literature was categorised into two main themes: the clinical considerations and decision making underpinning the exercise prescription and the physical implementation of the exercise prescription to the patient. Each theme contained key elements and sub-elements that may systematically guide a clinician through the exercise prescription process. Conclusion Whilst much evidence on exercise prescription in musculoskeletal rehabilitation is present in the literature, there is a lack of concise collated evidence that explores the elements of the exercise prescription process that could inform a clinicians clinical practice. The summary of these elements provides clinicians with a succinct summary that could aid in improving their exercise prescription process and potentially improve patient outcomes. Further research into the efficacy and importance of each element in clinical practice is needed.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":"27 1","pages":"453 - 463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2022.2139060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract Background Despite exercise being a fundamental component of musculoskeletal rehabilitation, there is a lack concise, evidence-based recommendations to inform the clinician’s development of rehabilitative exercise programs for patients in a one-on-one rehabilitation setting. Current evidence is widely dispersed throughout the literature, with each paper addressing one element of the exercise prescription process in isolation. Objectives The aim of this review is to draw together current and available literature to summarise the elements of the exercise prescription process that a clinician should consider when prescribing exercises programs for musculoskeletal rehabilitation in a one-on-one setting. Methods Literature was first obtained by database searches, then hand searches were performed based on the reference lists from papers from the original search. Literature was then summarised and synthesised to create a collation of the elements of the exercise prescription process a clinician should consider for musculoskeletal rehabilitation in a one-on-one setting. Major Findings The reviewed literature was categorised into two main themes: the clinical considerations and decision making underpinning the exercise prescription and the physical implementation of the exercise prescription to the patient. Each theme contained key elements and sub-elements that may systematically guide a clinician through the exercise prescription process. Conclusion Whilst much evidence on exercise prescription in musculoskeletal rehabilitation is present in the literature, there is a lack of concise collated evidence that explores the elements of the exercise prescription process that could inform a clinicians clinical practice. The summary of these elements provides clinicians with a succinct summary that could aid in improving their exercise prescription process and potentially improve patient outcomes. Further research into the efficacy and importance of each element in clinical practice is needed.
期刊介绍:
Physical Therapy Reviews is an international journal which aims to publish contemporary reviews, discussion papers and editorials within physical therapy, and in those basic and clinical sciences which are the basis of physical therapy. The journal is aimed at all those involved in research, teaching and practice within the area of physical therapy. Reviews (both descriptive and systematic) are invited in the following areas, which reflect the breadth and diversity of practice within physical therapy: •neurological rehabilitation •movement and exercise •orthopaedics and rheumatology •manual therapy and massage •sports medicine •measurement •chest physiotherapy •electrotherapeutics •obstetrics and gynaecology •complementary therapies •professional issues •musculoskeletal rehabilitation