Soviet Entrance to the Middle East and Manoeuvring between Superpowers—the Case of Israel and Egypt

IF 0.3 Q2 HISTORY
Yacov Livne
{"title":"Soviet Entrance to the Middle East and Manoeuvring between Superpowers—the Case of Israel and Egypt","authors":"Yacov Livne","doi":"10.30965/18763324-bja10053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article focuses on the strategies that Moscow chose during the first decade after World War II to overcome the obstacles created by the West to its entrance into the Middle East. The cases of Israel in 1948 and Egypt in 1955 show two different entry strategies used by Moscow and reflect significant changes in Soviet foreign policy that occurred between Stalin and Khrushchev toward developing countries. In 1948 Stalin chose an indirect and often tacit support of Israel, while in 1955 Khrushchev opted for a more direct approach with Egypt. Khrushchev’s confident tactics presented Moscow with new opportunities in the Middle East and the developing nations but also created long term challenges for the Soviet regime.\nAt the same time, Israel and Egypt successfully maneuvered between Moscow and the West to gain maximum benefits for their national security needs by using both camps of the Cold War.","PeriodicalId":41969,"journal":{"name":"Soviet and Post Soviet Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soviet and Post Soviet Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/18763324-bja10053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on the strategies that Moscow chose during the first decade after World War II to overcome the obstacles created by the West to its entrance into the Middle East. The cases of Israel in 1948 and Egypt in 1955 show two different entry strategies used by Moscow and reflect significant changes in Soviet foreign policy that occurred between Stalin and Khrushchev toward developing countries. In 1948 Stalin chose an indirect and often tacit support of Israel, while in 1955 Khrushchev opted for a more direct approach with Egypt. Khrushchev’s confident tactics presented Moscow with new opportunities in the Middle East and the developing nations but also created long term challenges for the Soviet regime. At the same time, Israel and Egypt successfully maneuvered between Moscow and the West to gain maximum benefits for their national security needs by using both camps of the Cold War.
苏联进入中东与大国之间的博弈——以以色列和埃及为例
本文重点介绍了莫斯科在二战后的第一个十年里为克服西方对其进入中东造成的障碍而选择的战略。1948年的以色列和1955年的埃及的案例表明了莫斯科使用的两种不同的进入策略,并反映了斯大林和赫鲁晓夫之间苏联对发展中国家外交政策的重大变化。1948年,斯大林选择了对以色列的间接且往往是默许的支持,而1955年,赫鲁晓夫选择了对埃及采取更直接的方式。赫鲁晓夫自信的策略为莫斯科在中东和发展中国家提供了新的机会,但也给苏联政权带来了长期挑战。与此同时,以色列和埃及成功地在莫斯科和西方之间周旋,通过利用冷战的两个阵营,为其国家安全需求获得最大利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信