Diocletian’s “imperial court” in Doclea

IF 0.2 0 ART
Ars Adriatica Pub Date : 2021-12-30 DOI:10.15291/aa.3417
Tin Turković
{"title":"Diocletian’s “imperial court” in Doclea","authors":"Tin Turković","doi":"10.15291/aa.3417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the paper is the re-examination of the “forum” of late antique Doclea (Dioclea), the interpretation of which has never been finished, although so information been collated during the past 131 years. Through re-examination of the complex with its distinctive features this paper offers answers on some of the still unresolved issues. A primary issue was to resolve who was responsible for its arrangement. After an onomastic analysis only one conclusion asserted itself - the “forum complex” could only have been erected by the Emperor Diocletian, who was obviously responsible for the rearrangement of the whole town of Doclea (Dioclea), his hometown. Further analysis of the concept, architectural arrangement and vocabulary used in the “forum” and adjoining “basilica” only corroborate that it was precisely Diocletian and his “architectural school”. Without a doubt, the Doclean (Dioclean) “forum complex” was innovative and original in many ways, along with its importance as an “imperial forum”, the “Diocletian’s imperial court”, will remain in the collective memory of the Montenegrins for centuries to come. The paper also represents an effort to clarify Diocletian’s background and the “modus operandi” of his “architectural school” whose presence in Doclea (Dioclea)has already been noticed.","PeriodicalId":40226,"journal":{"name":"Ars Adriatica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ars Adriatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15291/aa.3417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of the paper is the re-examination of the “forum” of late antique Doclea (Dioclea), the interpretation of which has never been finished, although so information been collated during the past 131 years. Through re-examination of the complex with its distinctive features this paper offers answers on some of the still unresolved issues. A primary issue was to resolve who was responsible for its arrangement. After an onomastic analysis only one conclusion asserted itself - the “forum complex” could only have been erected by the Emperor Diocletian, who was obviously responsible for the rearrangement of the whole town of Doclea (Dioclea), his hometown. Further analysis of the concept, architectural arrangement and vocabulary used in the “forum” and adjoining “basilica” only corroborate that it was precisely Diocletian and his “architectural school”. Without a doubt, the Doclean (Dioclean) “forum complex” was innovative and original in many ways, along with its importance as an “imperial forum”, the “Diocletian’s imperial court”, will remain in the collective memory of the Montenegrins for centuries to come. The paper also represents an effort to clarify Diocletian’s background and the “modus operandi” of his “architectural school” whose presence in Doclea (Dioclea)has already been noticed.
戴克里先在多利亚的“宫廷”
本文的目的是重新审视已故古董Doclea(Dioclea)的“论坛”,尽管在过去131年中对信息进行了整理,但对其的解释从未完成。通过对具有鲜明特征的综合体的重新审视,本文对一些尚未解决的问题提供了答案。一个主要问题是解决谁应对其安排负责。经过宏观分析,只有一个结论成立——“论坛综合体”只能由戴克里先皇帝建造,他显然对他的家乡多克利亚镇的重新布置负有责任。对“论坛”和毗邻的“巴西利卡”的概念、建筑布局和词汇的进一步分析只能证实它正是戴克里先和他的“建筑学派”。毫无疑问,Doclean(Dioclean)的“论坛综合体”在许多方面都是创新和独创的,其作为“帝国论坛”的重要性,即“戴克里先的帝国宫廷”,将在未来几个世纪留在黑山人的集体记忆中。本文还试图澄清戴克里先的背景和他的“建筑学派”的“运作方式”,他的“建筑流派”在戴克里亚的存在已经引起了人们的注意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信