The Evaluation of the History Education Curriculum in Higher Education

Risky Setiawan, A. Aman
{"title":"The Evaluation of the History Education Curriculum in Higher Education","authors":"Risky Setiawan, A. Aman","doi":"10.15294/paramita.v32i2.34535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to: (1) find out the relevance of the history study program curriculum to the field needs, (2) find out the advantages of the current program curriculum, and 3) find out what content needs to be strengthened in the curriculum program in Indonesia. This research method uses mixed approaches. While the strategy used is that the research has been planned in detail in the proposal before the researcher goes into the field, the suitable strategy is embedded research. The results of the study are: (1) the relevance shows that overall the curriculum content of the program is included in the excellent category or has a good weight; aspects of curriculum implementation amounting to 4.09 which shows that the implementation of the curriculum is already proper, and aspects of curriculum relevant to the needs of the field in the very good category; (2) the advantages of the curriculum that the curriculum has competitive advantages that generally involve; and (3) the things that need to be strengthened include several things such as (1) the need to balance the weight and content of courses, (2) the need for expansion of practicum subjects and the provision of tools, (3) the necessity of conducting prerequisite courses, and (4) the pattern thesis guidance which is further intensified. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) mengetahui relevansi kurikulum prodi sejarah dengan kebutuhan lapangan, (2) mengetahui kelebihan kurikulum prodi yang ada, dan 3) mengetahui konten apa yang perlu diperkuat dalam program kurikulum di Indonesia. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan campuran. Sedangkan strategi yang digunakan adalah penelitian yang telah direncanakan secara rinci dalam proposal sebelum peneliti terjun ke lapangan, strategi yang cocok adalah penelitian tertanam. Hasil penelitian adalah: (1) relevansi menunjukkan bahwa secara keseluruhan isi kurikulum program studi termasuk dalam kategori sangat baik atau memiliki bobot yang baik; aspek implementasi kurikulum sebesar 4,09 yang menunjukkan bahwa implementasi kurikulum sudah tepat, dan aspek kurikulum relevan dengan kebutuhan lapangan dalam kategori sangat baik; (2) keunggulan kurikulum bahwa kurikulum memiliki keunggulan kompetitif yang umumnya menyangkut; dan (3) hal-hal yang perlu diperkuat meliputi beberapa hal seperti (1) perlunya keseimbangan bobot dan isi mata kuliah, (2) perlunya perluasan mata kuliah praktikum dan penyediaan alat, (3) perlunya penyelenggaraan mata kuliah prasyarat, dan (4) pola bimbingan skripsi yang semakin diintensifkan. Cite this article: Setiawan, R., Aman. (2022). The Evaluation of the History Education Curriculum in Higher Education. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, 32(2), 263-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/paramita.v32i2.34535 ","PeriodicalId":30724,"journal":{"name":"Paramita Historical Studies Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paramita Historical Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/paramita.v32i2.34535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to: (1) find out the relevance of the history study program curriculum to the field needs, (2) find out the advantages of the current program curriculum, and 3) find out what content needs to be strengthened in the curriculum program in Indonesia. This research method uses mixed approaches. While the strategy used is that the research has been planned in detail in the proposal before the researcher goes into the field, the suitable strategy is embedded research. The results of the study are: (1) the relevance shows that overall the curriculum content of the program is included in the excellent category or has a good weight; aspects of curriculum implementation amounting to 4.09 which shows that the implementation of the curriculum is already proper, and aspects of curriculum relevant to the needs of the field in the very good category; (2) the advantages of the curriculum that the curriculum has competitive advantages that generally involve; and (3) the things that need to be strengthened include several things such as (1) the need to balance the weight and content of courses, (2) the need for expansion of practicum subjects and the provision of tools, (3) the necessity of conducting prerequisite courses, and (4) the pattern thesis guidance which is further intensified. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) mengetahui relevansi kurikulum prodi sejarah dengan kebutuhan lapangan, (2) mengetahui kelebihan kurikulum prodi yang ada, dan 3) mengetahui konten apa yang perlu diperkuat dalam program kurikulum di Indonesia. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan campuran. Sedangkan strategi yang digunakan adalah penelitian yang telah direncanakan secara rinci dalam proposal sebelum peneliti terjun ke lapangan, strategi yang cocok adalah penelitian tertanam. Hasil penelitian adalah: (1) relevansi menunjukkan bahwa secara keseluruhan isi kurikulum program studi termasuk dalam kategori sangat baik atau memiliki bobot yang baik; aspek implementasi kurikulum sebesar 4,09 yang menunjukkan bahwa implementasi kurikulum sudah tepat, dan aspek kurikulum relevan dengan kebutuhan lapangan dalam kategori sangat baik; (2) keunggulan kurikulum bahwa kurikulum memiliki keunggulan kompetitif yang umumnya menyangkut; dan (3) hal-hal yang perlu diperkuat meliputi beberapa hal seperti (1) perlunya keseimbangan bobot dan isi mata kuliah, (2) perlunya perluasan mata kuliah praktikum dan penyediaan alat, (3) perlunya penyelenggaraan mata kuliah prasyarat, dan (4) pola bimbingan skripsi yang semakin diintensifkan. Cite this article: Setiawan, R., Aman. (2022). The Evaluation of the History Education Curriculum in Higher Education. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, 32(2), 263-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/paramita.v32i2.34535 
高等教育历史教育课程评价
本研究旨在:(1)找出历史研究项目课程与该领域需求的相关性,(2)找出当前项目课程的优势,以及(3)找出印尼课程计划中需要加强的内容。这种研究方法采用混合方法。虽然所使用的策略是在研究人员进入该领域之前,在提案中对研究进行了详细规划,但合适的策略是嵌入式研究。研究结果表明:(1)相关性表明,该课程的课程内容总体上属于优秀类别或具有良好的权重课程实施方面达4.09,说明课程实施已经到位,与课程领域需求相关的方面属于非常好的范畴;(2) 课程的优势,即课程具有普遍涉及的竞争优势;(3)需要加强的内容包括:(1)需要平衡课程的权重和内容;(2)需要扩大实践科目和提供工具;(3)开设先修课程的必要性;(4)进一步加强模式论文指导。本研究旨在:(1)了解历史产品课程与领域需求的相关性,(2)了解现有产品课程的优势,(3)了解印尼课程计划需要加强哪些内容。这种研究方法采用混合方法。虽然要使用的策略是在研究进入该领域之前在提案中已经彻底规划的研究,但合适的策略是隐藏研究。研究结果表明:(1)相关性表明,学习计划的课程内容总体上属于一个非常好的类别或具有良好的波茨;4.09的课程实施方面表明课程实施是正确的,与领域需求相关的课程方面属于非常好的类别;(2) 课程的优越性是指课程具有普遍相关的竞争优势;(3)需要加强的方面包括:(1)波波头和大学眼睛内容的平衡,(2)大学眼睛向实践和工具的提供的延伸,(3)学前眼睛的维护,以及(4)越来越强化的剧本指导模式。引用本文:Setiawan,R.,Aman。(2022)。高等教育历史教育课程评价。帕拉米塔:《历史研究杂志》,〔UNK〕32(2),263-275。http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/paramita.v32i2.34535
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信