Unsuccessful bids: Coefficient of variation of bids as indicator of project risk

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Young Joo Kim, M. Skibniewski
{"title":"Unsuccessful bids: Coefficient of variation of bids as indicator of project risk","authors":"Young Joo Kim, M. Skibniewski","doi":"10.2478/otmcj-2020-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although unsuccessful bids are usually discarded once the bids are opened under the typical lowest-price sealed-bid project award auction environment, considering efforts and resources expended by responsive and responsible bidders, it is likely that not only a successful bid but also unsuccessful bids can convey important information about the project at hand. This article documents an effort to answer the question that whether projects that receive more dispersed estimates at the bidding stage are more likely to experience greater project cost changes. Taking collective intelligence as the theoretical framework, a total of 210 projects conducted by the Ohio Department of Transportation between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed to investigate the relationship between the coefficients of variation of bids and project final costs. It was found that large projects with above-average coefficients of variation of bids showed greater deviations from original award amounts than large projects with below-average coefficients of variation. The finding enables project owners to study the projects before execution by recouping valuable insights from the community of bidders on the possibility of greater project cost changes faced by the planned projects without complex and mathematically rigorous models.","PeriodicalId":42309,"journal":{"name":"Organization Technology and Management in Construction","volume":"12 1","pages":"2193 - 2199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization Technology and Management in Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2020-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Although unsuccessful bids are usually discarded once the bids are opened under the typical lowest-price sealed-bid project award auction environment, considering efforts and resources expended by responsive and responsible bidders, it is likely that not only a successful bid but also unsuccessful bids can convey important information about the project at hand. This article documents an effort to answer the question that whether projects that receive more dispersed estimates at the bidding stage are more likely to experience greater project cost changes. Taking collective intelligence as the theoretical framework, a total of 210 projects conducted by the Ohio Department of Transportation between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed to investigate the relationship between the coefficients of variation of bids and project final costs. It was found that large projects with above-average coefficients of variation of bids showed greater deviations from original award amounts than large projects with below-average coefficients of variation. The finding enables project owners to study the projects before execution by recouping valuable insights from the community of bidders on the possibility of greater project cost changes faced by the planned projects without complex and mathematically rigorous models.
不成功投标:作为项目风险指标的投标变动系数
摘要尽管在典型的最低价密封投标项目授标拍卖环境下,一旦开标,不成功的投标通常会被丢弃,但考虑到响应和负责的投标人所花费的努力和资源,很可能不仅成功的投标,而且不成功的投标都能传达有关手头项目的重要信息。本文试图回答这样一个问题,即在投标阶段获得更分散估计的项目是否更有可能经历更大的项目成本变化。以集体智能为理论框架,对俄亥俄州交通部在2008年至2018年间进行的210个项目进行了分析,以调查投标变动系数与项目最终成本之间的关系。研究发现,投标变异系数高于平均水平的大型项目比变异系数低于平均水平的大项目与原始中标金额的偏差更大。这一发现使项目所有者能够在执行前对项目进行研究,方法是从投标人群体中获得宝贵的见解,了解在没有复杂和数学严谨模型的情况下,计划项目可能面临更大的项目成本变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信