Intelligent Prediction Models For UCS Of Cement/Lime Stabilized QLD Soil

IF 0.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
V. Pham
{"title":"Intelligent Prediction Models For UCS Of Cement/Lime Stabilized QLD Soil","authors":"V. Pham","doi":"10.56295/agj5721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to develop proposed predictive formulas for determining the unconfined compression strength (UCS) of cement/lime stabilized Queensland soil based on Multi-Gene Genetic Programming (MGGP) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). The models evaluate the effect of three independent variables, including the binder type (cement and lime), the binder content, and the curing time, on the UCS of the stabilized soil. The results show that the selected optimal MGGP and ANN models can predict the target values with high correlation coefficients (R-value approximately of 0.992 and 0.998, respectively), and low errors (e.g., RMSE and MAE). The sensitivity analysis of the MGGP and ANN models provide the same results, in which the curing time has the greatest influence on the UCS value, followed by the binder content and binder type. The performances of the MGGP and ANN models are compared based on statistical parameters, several external criteria, and distribution properties. The study finds that both models show their generalization capabilities with robust, powerful, and accurate prediction ability; however, the ANN model slightly outperforms the MGGP model. The proposed predictive equations formulated from the selected optimal MGGP and ANN models could help engineers and consultants to choose the suitable binder and the reasonable amount of binder in the pre-planning and pre-design period.","PeriodicalId":43619,"journal":{"name":"Australian Geomechanics Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Geomechanics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56295/agj5721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study aims to develop proposed predictive formulas for determining the unconfined compression strength (UCS) of cement/lime stabilized Queensland soil based on Multi-Gene Genetic Programming (MGGP) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). The models evaluate the effect of three independent variables, including the binder type (cement and lime), the binder content, and the curing time, on the UCS of the stabilized soil. The results show that the selected optimal MGGP and ANN models can predict the target values with high correlation coefficients (R-value approximately of 0.992 and 0.998, respectively), and low errors (e.g., RMSE and MAE). The sensitivity analysis of the MGGP and ANN models provide the same results, in which the curing time has the greatest influence on the UCS value, followed by the binder content and binder type. The performances of the MGGP and ANN models are compared based on statistical parameters, several external criteria, and distribution properties. The study finds that both models show their generalization capabilities with robust, powerful, and accurate prediction ability; however, the ANN model slightly outperforms the MGGP model. The proposed predictive equations formulated from the selected optimal MGGP and ANN models could help engineers and consultants to choose the suitable binder and the reasonable amount of binder in the pre-planning and pre-design period.
水泥/石灰稳定QLD土单轴强度的智能预测模型
本研究旨在开发基于多基因遗传规划(MGGP)和人工神经网络(ANN)的水泥/石灰稳定昆士兰土壤无侧限抗压强度(UCS)预测公式。该模型评估了三个自变量对稳定土UCS的影响,包括粘结剂类型(水泥和石灰)、粘结剂含量和固化时间。结果表明,所选择的最优MGGP和ANN模型可以预测具有高相关系数(R值分别约为0.992和0.998)和低误差(如RMSE和MAE)的目标值。MGGP和ANN模型的敏感性分析提供了相同的结果,其中固化时间对UCS值的影响最大,其次是粘合剂含量和粘合剂类型。基于统计参数、几个外部准则和分布特性,比较了MGGP和ANN模型的性能。研究发现,这两种模型都具有较强的泛化能力,具有强大、准确的预测能力;然而,ANN模型略优于MGGP模型。所提出的预测方程由选定的最优MGGP和ANN模型制定,可以帮助工程师和顾问在预规划和预设计阶段选择合适的粘合剂和合理的粘合剂用量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Geomechanics Journal
Australian Geomechanics Journal ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信