The structure of knowledge and dynamics of scholarly communication in mobile media and communication research, 2013–2022

IF 3.1 1区文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION

Mobile Media & Communication Pub Date : 2022-10-22 DOI:10.1177/20501579221132212

Sun Kyong Lee

{"title":"The structure of knowledge and dynamics of scholarly communication in mobile media and communication research, 2013–2022","authors":"Sun Kyong Lee","doi":"10.1177/20501579221132212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a relatively young journal,Mobile Media & Communication (MMC) has become reputable and influential in the field of communication and technology research. While contemplating the questions provided by the editors of MMC concerning the 10th anniversary issue, I happened to read an article about the citation analysis of agendasetting research (Tai, 2009). Based on social network analysis, Tai analyzed the structure of the citation networks of the key literature (56 journal publications) in agenda-setting research. The analysis results showed how agenda-setting as a sub-field of mass communication and journalism research has developed and evolved over 10 years (1996–2005), referring to a few authoritative pieces. For further details of that analysis, please refer to the excellent article by Tai as this space is limited to discussing topics specifically relevant to our journal, MMC. I was inspired by Tai’s (2009) approach and intrigued about whatMMC’s citation networks would look like. Though I am aware that SAGE, the publisher, does its own citation analysis and posts updates on the journal website regarding the “Most cited” and “Most read” articles, those statistics involve citations and readership from outside the journal as well; thus, they cover a much wider range of authors and readers. For this article, I am interested in our internal conversations, particularly regarding the work","PeriodicalId":46650,"journal":{"name":"Mobile Media & Communication","volume":"11 1","pages":"30 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mobile Media & Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221132212","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a relatively young journal,Mobile Media & Communication (MMC) has become reputable and influential in the field of communication and technology research. While contemplating the questions provided by the editors of MMC concerning the 10th anniversary issue, I happened to read an article about the citation analysis of agendasetting research (Tai, 2009). Based on social network analysis, Tai analyzed the structure of the citation networks of the key literature (56 journal publications) in agenda-setting research. The analysis results showed how agenda-setting as a sub-field of mass communication and journalism research has developed and evolved over 10 years (1996–2005), referring to a few authoritative pieces. For further details of that analysis, please refer to the excellent article by Tai as this space is limited to discussing topics specifically relevant to our journal, MMC. I was inspired by Tai’s (2009) approach and intrigued about whatMMC’s citation networks would look like. Though I am aware that SAGE, the publisher, does its own citation analysis and posts updates on the journal website regarding the “Most cited” and “Most read” articles, those statistics involve citations and readership from outside the journal as well; thus, they cover a much wider range of authors and readers. For this article, I am interested in our internal conversations, particularly regarding the work

查看原文本刊更多论文

2013-2022年移动媒体和传播研究中学术传播的知识结构和动态

作为一本相对年轻的期刊，《移动媒体与通信》在通信和技术研究领域已经有了良好的声誉和影响力。在思考MMC编辑们提出的关于十周年纪念的问题时，我偶然读到一篇关于机构设置研究引文分析的文章（Tai，2009）。基于社会网络分析，戴分析了议程设置研究中的关键文献（56种期刊出版物）的引文网络结构。分析结果显示，议程设置作为大众传播和新闻研究的一个子领域，在10年的时间里（1996-2005）是如何发展和演变的，参考了一些权威文章。有关该分析的更多细节，请参阅Tai的精彩文章，因为此空间仅限于讨论与我们的期刊MMC特别相关的主题。我受到了Tai（2009）方法的启发，对MMC的引文网络会是什么样子很感兴趣。尽管我知道出版商SAGE自己进行引文分析，并在期刊网站上发布关于“被引用最多”和“阅读次数最多”文章的更新，但这些统计数据也涉及期刊外的引文和读者群；因此，它们涵盖了更广泛的作者和读者。对于这篇文章，我对我们的内部对话感兴趣，特别是关于工作

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Mobile Media & Communication COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

9.40

自引率

16.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Mobile Media & Communication is a peer-reviewed forum for international, interdisciplinary academic research on the dynamic field of mobile media and communication. Mobile Media & Communication draws on a wide and continually renewed range of disciplines, engaging broadly in the concept of mobility itself.